Sidley Austin NY v Goodwin Procter NY Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432404
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Sidley Austin NY v Goodwin Procter NY
Thoughts?
- MrKappus
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:46 am
Re: Sidley Austin NY v Goodwin Procter NY
I have a thought. Lacking details (your goals, interests, ties, background, impressions, etc.), this thread comes off as the simple product of a simple person.
-
- Posts: 432404
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley Austin NY v Goodwin Procter NY
I know my goals, interests, etc- I don't want people to judge how my traits match up to those firms, I am going to do that myself. I am looking for others' experiences with these firms. There is no need to be a jerk.MrKappus wrote:I have a thought. Lacking details (your goals, interests, ties, background, impressions, etc.), this thread comes off as the simple product of a simple person.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login