Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Which firm would you pick and why.
My thoughts at the moment are that the work at Mayer in Chicago would be the best, while the people at Jones Day are really friendly and chill, while Schiff might have better quality of life.
Undecided on practice area.
My thoughts at the moment are that the work at Mayer in Chicago would be the best, while the people at Jones Day are really friendly and chill, while Schiff might have better quality of life.
Undecided on practice area.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
I hated the Schiff people at OCI. Definitely tried to play "Stump the law student" more than any other firm I talked to.Anonymous User wrote:Which firm would you pick and why.
My thoughts at the moment are that the work at Mayer in Chicago would be the best, while the people at Jones Day are really friendly and chill, while Schiff might have better quality of life.
Undecided on practice area.
Go with Mayer Brown. You get one shot at this. Take it.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Do you have offers from all of these? If so, how long between your JD callback and offer? Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Mayer is really the no-brainer answer here.
- tome
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Jones Day didn't lay anyone off. Might be worth something if there is a double dip recession.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:38 pm
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Publicly. But then again, they don't do anything publicly.tome wrote:Jones Day didn't lay anyone off. Might be worth something if there is a double dip recession.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Did you get an offer from Jones Day? When was your callback?Anonymous User wrote:Which firm would you pick and why.
My thoughts at the moment are that the work at Mayer in Chicago would be the best, while the people at Jones Day are really friendly and chill, while Schiff might have better quality of life.
Undecided on practice area.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Got a ding letter 1 week after my CB, FWIW.Anonymous User wrote:Did you get an offer from Jones Day? When was your callback?Anonymous User wrote:Which firm would you pick and why.
My thoughts at the moment are that the work at Mayer in Chicago would be the best, while the people at Jones Day are really friendly and chill, while Schiff might have better quality of life.
Undecided on practice area.
- tome
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
Hitachi wrote:Publicly. But then again, they don't do anything publicly.tome wrote:Jones Day didn't lay anyone off. Might be worth something if there is a double dip recession.
We would know if they tried to secretly lay off a bunch of people. ATL is all seeing.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
I've had experience with both of these places (Schiff is not on the same level as the other two). These two are NOT comparable. Despite what someone else alluded to re: layoffs (stealth or otherwise) at Jones Day, they have been, if at all, very limited in number. That was not the case at Mayer Brown. The whole place was dragged down and depressed as a result. You should be worried about the long-term stability of the firm; I personally would feel safer at Jones Day. Especially as this is a summer gig, you've got a much better chance of getting a permanent offer at JD over MB.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
You do realize that Mayer gave 100% offers this summer right, just like every other Chicago firm?Anonymous User wrote:I've had experience with both of these places (Schiff is not on the same level as the other two). These two are NOT comparable. Despite what someone else alluded to re: layoffs (stealth or otherwise) at Jones Day, they have been, if at all, very limited in number. That was not the case at Mayer Brown. The whole place was dragged down and depressed as a result. You should be worried about the long-term stability of the firm; I personally would feel safer at Jones Day. Especially as this is a summer gig, you've got a much better chance of getting a permanent offer at JD over MB.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Mayer Brown v. Jones Day (Chicago) v. Schiff
You also realize that this was after a nearly 70% reduction in summer class, which followed a 70% offer summer, which was itself a 33% reduction in class size from the year before (--LinkRemoved--)? The fact that they've reduced class size to fit their needs is admirable, but the fact that the class was so small and their office in Chicago is so large is somewhat worrying. Also, they've shown a willingness to lay off young associates (publicly, so kudos to them) that is not the case at JD. And please, don't parrot the "stealth layoff" line that is so popular and so unsupported.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login