I loved my visits to both and am indifferent between Chi and NY as a places to live.
I'm interested in litigation and perhaps products liability. I'd also like to spend 3-5 years at the firm before moving on (after 1 year of clerking)
Are exits ops from lit different at these firms?
Does one have a more brutal up or out policy than the other? NALP indicates that Skadden lit is far more leveraged than Kirkland's (93/329 v. 92/105). Kirkland really has nearly a 1:1 partner to assoc ratio in its lit dept?
Thanks for any insight!
Kirkland (Chi) or Skadden (NY) for lit? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland (Chi) or Skadden (NY) for lit?
Depends on whether the the NALP number includes non-equity partners.Kirkland really has nearly a 1:1 partner to assoc ratio in its lit dept?
I'd take Kirkland. One of the best litigation departments in the nation, excellent training, and you really can get early responsibility.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland (Chi) or Skadden (NY) for lit?
Skadden NY for sure.Anonymous User wrote:I loved my visits to both and am indifferent between Chi and NY as a places to live.
I'm interested in litigation and perhaps products liability. I'd also like to spend 3-5 years at the firm before moving on (after 1 year of clerking)
Are exits ops from lit different at these firms?
Does one have a more brutal up or out policy than the other? NALP indicates that Skadden lit is far more leveraged than Kirkland's (93/329 v. 92/105). Kirkland really has nearly a 1:1 partner to assoc ratio in its lit dept?
Thanks for any insight!
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland (Chi) or Skadden (NY) for lit?
Anonymous User wrote:Skadden NY for sure.Anonymous User wrote:I loved my visits to both and am indifferent between Chi and NY as a places to live.
I'm interested in litigation and perhaps products liability. I'd also like to spend 3-5 years at the firm before moving on (after 1 year of clerking)
Are exits ops from lit different at these firms?
Does one have a more brutal up or out policy than the other? NALP indicates that Skadden lit is far more leveraged than Kirkland's (93/329 v. 92/105). Kirkland really has nearly a 1:1 partner to assoc ratio in its lit dept?
Thanks for any insight!
Lol. Any reason other than vault rankings?
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland (Chi) or Skadden (NY) for lit?
Yes. Plus Chicago is amazing, and your COL is lower there. K&E's building is really neat too.Anonymous User wrote:Depends on whether the the NALP number includes non-equity partners.Kirkland really has nearly a 1:1 partner to assoc ratio in its lit dept?
I'd take Kirkland. One of the best litigation departments in the nation, excellent training, and you really can get early responsibility.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login