Ranking the Markets Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:36 am
Ranking the Markets
I'd be interested to see people's impressions of how relatively competitive the markets were this year. This is probably entirely wrong-headed, but I think it might be worth a try anyway, because I had no idea going in that Chicago was going to be the bloodbath it was. I realize that many people did, and I should have looked into it more, but still, it might be useful for current 1Ls to see what people say.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:36 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
My impression from the few markets I know anything about is, from easiest to hardest:
1. New York
2. Texas
3. California
[gap]
4. Chicago
5. D.C.
1. New York
2. Texas
3. California
[gap]
4. Chicago
5. D.C.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
As far as difficulty getting positions in biglaw goes, in order of descending difficulty:Person wrote:I'd be interested to see people's impressions of how relatively competitive the markets were this year. This is probably entirely wrong-headed, but I think it might be worth a try anyway, because I had no idea going in that Chicago was going to be the bloodbath it was. I realize that many people did, and I should have looked into it more, but still, it might be useful for current 1Ls to see what people say.
Chicago/DC (for different reasons) -> Texas/CA -> NYC (not that NYC firms aren't selective, but it's the only market that is still hiring a fair number of people)
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I got shut out at OCI targeting SF and DC (T14 well above median with decent WE; strong SF ties and good DC ties) ... so I've started mass-mailing Chicago. This list makes me go FML.Person wrote:I'd be interested to see people's impressions of how relatively competitive the markets were this year. This is probably entirely wrong-headed, but I think it might be worth a try anyway, because I had no idea going in that Chicago was going to be the bloodbath it was. I realize that many people did, and I should have looked into it more, but still, it might be useful for current 1Ls to see what people say.
I have zero interest in NYC itself, but if I'd been smart I would have tacked on NYC bids. Or, hell, LA.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
DC was an absolute slaughter. I know DC destroyed my hopes and dreams. I'm sure it did the same to others too.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
...
Last edited by dood on Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
DC has always been the most difficult market as far as selectivity goes. Chicago is on the list for a different reason, obviously - the Chicago market is hurting, and the firms simply aren't taking that many people this year.
Edit:
My list isn't for me personally. I've never done an interview for anywhere aside from the Chicago market, with the exception of a "what the hell?" screener with Cravath that I didn't care about at all. I'm talking overall trends.
Edit:
My list isn't for me personally. I've never done an interview for anywhere aside from the Chicago market, with the exception of a "what the hell?" screener with Cravath that I didn't care about at all. I'm talking overall trends.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I had thought DC would be NYC-esque. They have so many firms.ToTransferOrNot wrote:DC has always been the most difficult market as far as selectivity goes. Chicago is on the list for a different reason, obviously - the Chicago market is hurting, and the firms simply aren't taking that many people this year.
Career services should have an SOP of giving stern warnings to anyone who talks to them about a bidding strategy that doesn't include NYC or LA. Unless they have a devastating transcript and will get auto-CB'd.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Lots of firms, but generally smaller offices than NYC. They've always been able to demand much higher numbers, on the whole.Anonymous User wrote:I had thought DC would be NYC-esque. They have so many firms.ToTransferOrNot wrote:DC has always been the most difficult market as far as selectivity goes. Chicago is on the list for a different reason, obviously - the Chicago market is hurting, and the firms simply aren't taking that many people this year.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Maybe I'll mass-mail NYC and LA. ... ha ha. Yeah right.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Lots of firms, but generally smaller offices than NYC. They've always been able to demand much higher numbers, on the whole.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
^^^ I concur with ToTransferOrNot.
DC is straight-up selective. Hogan is one of the less-selective big DC offices and is probably comparable to the lower V10 (STB, Weil, Kirkland).
Chicago is extremely picky about ties/fit. Once you get out of Kirkland/Sidley's grade range, you're targeting firms with tiny summer classes and it's easy to get shut-out even with grades that are in the ballpark.
DC is straight-up selective. Hogan is one of the less-selective big DC offices and is probably comparable to the lower V10 (STB, Weil, Kirkland).
Chicago is extremely picky about ties/fit. Once you get out of Kirkland/Sidley's grade range, you're targeting firms with tiny summer classes and it's easy to get shut-out even with grades that are in the ballpark.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I know someone who got an offer from Cravath as a 3L through a mass-mail. Just throwing that out there. At this point, if you're staring down no job, I would mass-mail every law firm in the country.Anonymous User wrote:Maybe I'll mass-mail NYC and LA. ... ha ha. Yeah right.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Lots of firms, but generally smaller offices than NYC. They've always been able to demand much higher numbers, on the whole.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Anonymous User wrote:^^^ I concur with ToTransferOrNot.
DC is straight-up selective. Hogan is one of the less-selective big DC offices and is probably comparable to the lower V10 (STB, Weil, Kirkland).
Chicago is extremely picky about ties/fit. Once you get out of Kirkland/Sidley's grade range, you're targeting firms with tiny summer classes and it's easy to get shut-out even with grades that are in the ballpark.
This is precisely what I wish I knew going into OCI. If this thread helps just one person understand just this one point, I think it is actually going to be worth it. I got lucky, but I know it was just that: luck; and it could have been a complete fuck up because I did not understand this at all.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Yes, but unfortunately most of those firms now have tiny class sizes, which means they can be extremely selective. After my experience bidding mostly on DC, I would advise everyone - even law review people - to use 1/3 or preferably 1/2 of their bids on NYC or another market that is not as competitive.Anonymous User wrote:I had thought DC would be NYC-esque. They have so many firms.ToTransferOrNot wrote:DC has always been the most difficult market as far as selectivity goes. Chicago is on the list for a different reason, obviously - the Chicago market is hurting, and the firms simply aren't taking that many people this year.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:36 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Anonymous User wrote:Yes, but unfortunately most of those firms now have tiny class sizes, which means they can be extremely selective. After my experience bidding mostly on DC, I would advise everyone - even law review people - to use 1/3 or preferably 1/2 of their bids on NYC or another market that is not as competitive.Anonymous User wrote:I had thought DC would be NYC-esque. They have so many firms.ToTransferOrNot wrote:DC has always been the most difficult market as far as selectivity goes. Chicago is on the list for a different reason, obviously - the Chicago market is hurting, and the firms simply aren't taking that many people this year.
Credited. The risk of not getting a job at all is not worth the potential benefit of being where you want to be.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I find it amusing that virtually all of my ties are to Chicago and I have been shut out of that market, while I have flimsy (or no) ties to DC and am waiting to hear after a callback there...
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Boston is rough rough rough this year. Outside of Ropes, Goodwin, and Wilmer, most big firms in the area's class sizes are around 2-10.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
LA is easier than SF, did way better than sf people with similar profiles, and MUCH MORE Work experience.
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I thought LA was tough if you didn't go to USC or UCLA - seems like the early OCI of those schools coupled with people who want to stay in CA made it very difficult to get in (NU/U Chicago student talking here)
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
At my school (MVP), I believe LA was easy when compared to Chi/DC/SF. Firms like having diverse SA classes, aka students from different schools.Anonymous User wrote:I thought LA was tough if you didn't go to USC or UCLA - seems like the early OCI of those schools coupled with people who want to stay in CA made it very difficult to get in (NU/U Chicago student talking here)
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:51 pm
Re: Ranking the Markets
How is Philadelphia?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
Why is that? I'm not debating the correctness of this point, but it's always interested me.Anonymous User wrote:At my school (MVP), I believe LA was easy when compared to Chi/DC/SF. Firms like having diverse SA classes, aka students from different schools.Anonymous User wrote:I thought LA was tough if you didn't go to USC or UCLA - seems like the early OCI of those schools coupled with people who want to stay in CA made it very difficult to get in (NU/U Chicago student talking here)
-
- Posts: 432547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the Markets
I got crushed in CA. That is all. Low level of preselects and zero callbacks. Blaming it on ties.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login