Thoughts on Paul, Weiss Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
How does Paul | Weiss compare to other litigation outfits such as Kirkland, Williams & Connolly, Munger, Susman, etc?
How selective/prestigious is the firm, generally?
How selective/prestigious is the firm, generally?
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
but the best
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
way more prestigious than kirkland. but not the others, williams and connolly the best.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
Anonymous User wrote:way more prestigious than kirkland.
LOL no.
In terms of how good the firms are, the ranking would be:
1) Susman
2) W&C
3) Kirkland
3) Munger
3) Paul Weiss
It's really hard to compare these firms. Susman is a boutique. W&C might as well be a boutique. Kirkland is a national litigation giant. Munger is good, but not national in reach. Paul Weiss has established itself as the go-to shop for financial crisis-related litigation.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
what about corporate? how does pw stack up to the rest of the V20? i'm interviewing for corporate.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
I wouldn't dare take Paul Weiss over Debevoise for corporate. Between Paul Weiss and Kirkland NY, it's tough, though obviously K&E if you want to do private equity. Other than that, I can't think of another firm V10-V20 worth taking over Paul Weiss.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
Care to elaborate on that? I have CBs at both.Anonymous User wrote:I wouldn't dare take Paul Weiss over Debevoise for corporate.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
I had a callback with them recently, and I just thought I should note that out of all the firms I visited so far, they were by far the most friendly people. I'd rather work with everyone I met there than anyone else. Praying I get in.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
+1. The only firm other than PW where I found each person I touched genuinely warm and genuine was DPW. Definitely good people in those firms, as most others I know reported similar experiences.Anonymous User wrote:I had a callback with them recently, and I just thought I should note that out of all the firms I visited so far, they were by far the most friendly people. I'd rather work with everyone I met there than anyone else. Praying I get in.
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
.
Last edited by NYAssociate on Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
Can anyone comment on how long, from CB to offer? Thanks.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
1 week, exactly.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone comment on how long, from CB to offer? Thanks.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
everyone at Paul Weiss told me they had "always known" they wanted to be litigators. ugh.
also, the offices weren't great.
also, the offices weren't great.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
Corporate/M&A: The Elite: New YorkNYAssociate wrote:Debevoise just has a better corporate practice, period.Anonymous User wrote:Care to elaborate on that? I have CBs at both.Anonymous User wrote:I wouldn't dare take Paul Weiss over Debevoise for corporate.
Band 1:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Simpson Thacher & bartlett llp
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Band 2:
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Latham & Watkins LLPShearman & Sterling LLP
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Band 3:
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Band 4:
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Dewey & LeBoeuf
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
Disagree. While Susman and W&C are most certainly more selective than Paul Weiss, I wouldn't say that Kirkland is more prestigious than Paul Weiss. I'd put both Kirkland & Paul Weiss on the same level. This of course assumes litigation.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:way more prestigious than kirkland.
LOL no.
In terms of how good the firms are, the ranking would be:
1) Susman
2) W&C
3) Kirkland
3) Munger
3) Paul Weiss
It's really hard to compare these firms. Susman is a boutique. W&C might as well be a boutique. Kirkland is a national litigation giant. Munger is good, but not national in reach. Paul Weiss has established itself as the go-to shop for financial crisis-related litigation.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
It's funny how subjective all of this is, e.g., I've never met a DPW lawyer I liked (at all), and I've met several.Anonymous User wrote:+1. The only firm other than PW where I found each person I touched genuinely warm and genuine was DPW. Definitely good people in those firms, as most others I know reported similar experiences.Anonymous User wrote:I had a callback with them recently, and I just thought I should note that out of all the firms I visited so far, they were by far the most friendly people. I'd rather work with everyone I met there than anyone else. Praying I get in.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Thoughts on Paul, Weiss
I did put them on the same level. Notice they both have a "3" next to them?Anonymous User wrote:Disagree. While Susman and W&C are most certainly more selective than Paul Weiss, I wouldn't say that Kirkland is more prestigious than Paul Weiss. I'd put both Kirkland & Paul Weiss on the same level. This of course assumes litigation.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:way more prestigious than kirkland.
LOL no.
In terms of how good the firms are, the ranking would be:
1) Susman
2) W&C
3) Kirkland
3) Munger
3) Paul Weiss
It's really hard to compare these firms. Susman is a boutique. W&C might as well be a boutique. Kirkland is a national litigation giant. Munger is good, but not national in reach. Paul Weiss has established itself as the go-to shop for financial crisis-related litigation.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login