Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432536
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:18 am

What range vault firms should I bid on? Title says it I am Top 15% at GULC, I am looking NYC only. Any V10s worth a bid? If so, which ones? Thanks in advance for the advice.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432536
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:32 am

Probably a chance everywhere in NY except WLRK, CSM, S&C, Cleary, DPW, Debevoise.

Skadden, Boies, STB, and Paul Weiss all pretty big reaches but probably worth a bid.

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by 270910 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:57 am

Anonymous User wrote:Probably a chance everywhere in NY except WLRK, CSM, S&C, Cleary, DPW, Debevoise.

Skadden, Boies, STB, and Paul Weiss all pretty big reaches but probably worth a bid.
More or less credited. We can quibble over how big of a reach those firms are or are not, but that feels about accurate.

One thought: Since GULC gives you 50 bids, and I'd imagine both NYC and extremely selective NYC firms will be less popular, I'd consider bidding on the WLR/CSM/S&C type firms, just lower on your list. Your credentials are likely below what they're looking for, but not so far below that you would be wasting their time. And word on the street is that a lot of people got interviews at those selective places even with low bids due to the fact that everyone was running scared to the ostensibly 'less selective' firms, so that could be shrewd strategery.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432536
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:56 am

disco_barred wrote:One thought: Since GULC gives you 50 bids, and I'd imagine both NYC and extremely selective NYC firms will be less popular, I'd consider bidding on the WLR/CSM/S&C type firms, just lower on your list. Your credentials are likely below what they're looking for, but not so far below that you would be wasting their time. And word on the street is that a lot of people got interviews at those selective places even with low bids due to the fact that everyone was running scared to the ostensibly 'less selective' firms, so that could be shrewd strategery.
I'm also at GULC, and I'm considering this strategy. Anyone have general thoughts on how low to bid these selective firms? I.e., how low is too low, how high is too high? I might use spots 19 and 20 for Cleary-type firms, but should I bid these even lower (i.e., closer to 50)? I realize there is probably no way to answer this question.

Edit: GULC gave us info while registering for classes re: how low you could preference a class and still get a spot in it. Really wish they'd give us similar info for OCI bidding. As it is, they just give us the # of interview slots and the number of people who bid on the office last year.

afterglow99

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:24 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by afterglow99 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:59 am

Any bidding strategy advise for a transfer to GULC? I was thinking of putting Philly, Boston, and Wilmington firms high on my list, as NY and DC might be too competitive.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432536
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:42 pm

Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.

User avatar
profs<3mycomments

New
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:10 pm

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by profs<3mycomments » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.
Big words for an anonymous user. I generally agree though.

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by 270910 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.
Well, WLRK likely isn't even going so that's out of the question.

CSM and S&C hire from roughly the top 10%+ (though S&C is more selective) at the T13-T6 law schools I've looked at. But not exclusively. Not sure I'd call that so far out of their league that it'd be a ghost interview.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432536
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:48 pm

disco_barred wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.
Well, WLRK likely isn't even going so that's out of the question.

CSM and S&C hire from roughly the top 10%+ (though S&C is more selective) at the T13-T6 law schools I've looked at. But not exclusively. Not sure I'd call that so far out of their league that it'd be a ghost interview.
I go to a better school than GULC (one of Duke/UM/UVA/Penn) and no one is getting CSM/S&C ITE without being top 5% or grading on to LR.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by 270910 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
disco_barred wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.
Well, WLRK likely isn't even going so that's out of the question.

CSM and S&C hire from roughly the top 10%+ (though S&C is more selective) at the T13-T6 law schools I've looked at. But not exclusively. Not sure I'd call that so far out of their league that it'd be a ghost interview.
I go to a better school than GULC (one of Duke/UM/UVA/Penn) and no one is getting CSM/S&C ITE without being top 5% or grading on to LR.
CSM hired 20 people last year and didn't even attend OCI at all of the schools listed above. It has hired 100+ in other years. Attempting to predict how selective they will be this year is a crap shoot for anybody.

S&C has tended to be much more selective. I'm not even fundamentally disagreeing with you that OP has very poor odds at S&C. But since OP is at GULC, that's 50 bids. And top 15% strikes me as the range where the odds are still real. You may disagree, and OP should consider these opinions when placing a bid.

But I do take umbrage at your statement that "no one is getting CSM/S&C ITE without being top 5% or grading on to LR" from the schools you listed. I know somebody from a "better than GULC" school who was in the top 20ish percent that got a call back at S&C last year. You just have to be careful about speaking in absolutes. I still grant you that the overwhelming majority of people outside of the top 5-10% did not have a snowball's chance at the firms.

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Top 15% GULC Bidding Advice

Post by rayiner » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:54 pm

disco_barred wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Top 15% at GULC is so far out of WLRK/CSM/S&C's league (if you're not URM, have some insane Ivy UG/MA/PhD degree, or some other ridiculous credentials) that you'd essentially be bidding on ghost interviews. Total waste.

Skadden/STB/Weil/Paul Weiss are the right high target/reaches, DPW/Debevoise/Cleary would be big reaches.
Well, WLRK likely isn't even going so that's out of the question.

CSM and S&C hire from roughly the top 10%+ (though S&C is more selective) at the T13-T6 law schools I've looked at. But not exclusively. Not sure I'd call that so far out of their league that it'd be a ghost interview.
S&C used to hire top 15-20% at NU pre-ITE. Le sigh.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”