MidLaw vs. SEC Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:08 am

Assuming I have offers at the SEC and small to mid-size law firms in NY, which has better career prospects for working my way into biglaw litigation? I feel like the benefit of the SEC is immediate responsibility. However, the downside is that I would not get a lot of litigation experience. Obviously, the law firms would have the flip-side, more litigation experience, but less responsibility initially. I am also looking at clerkships, but I may have to make this decision before those chips fall into place. In past years, my numbers would have been competitive for biglaw coming from my school, but this year I was just outside the competitive belt. Therefore, I don't think my grades will hold me back once the economy turns around so long as I can get meaningful experience over the next 2-5+ years while we wait for that to happen. Any thoughts?

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by 270910 » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:12 am

As far as I know, nothing feeds into biglaw litigation except biglaw litigation. You could probably lateral into some kind of regulatory / government affairs / anti-trust / financial industry lobbying or consulting practice, I would imagine. But I've never heard of big law firms that make hires from agencies (excepting of course something like a Bristow Fellow, of course) or smaller law firms on a regular enough basis to provide concrete advice about how to make lightning strike twice.

jnorsky

Bronze
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:26 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by jnorsky » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:29 am

I know two people that have gone from SEC NY to doing securities litigation for private firms. One was at smaller firms in NYC (still made bank) and one is a partner at a huge firm in NYC (Vault certified). It seems that private is the way out from the SEC if you make the right contacts, they were pretty outgoing people. They told me after a while most either stick around as lifers there or get into private practice in whatever their specialty was.

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by 270910 » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:31 am

jnorsky wrote:I know two people that have gone from SEC NY to doing securities litigation for private firms. One was at smaller firms in NYC (still made bank) and one is a partner at a huge firm in NYC (Vault certified). It seems that private is the way out from the SEC if you make the right contacts, they were pretty outgoing people. They told me after a while most either stick around as lifers there or get into private practice in whatever their specialty was.
You know, I didn't even think of securities litigation. That's probably TCR.

Worth poking around firm bios, I bet you can find some examples of careers that involved stints at the SEC and go from there.

Voyager

Silver
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by Voyager » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:36 am

Assuming SEC honors program... SEC!!!

No question. No Contest. How is this even up for discussion.

You go to the SEC for a few years and you will leave as a high demand product. THAT is how you make partner fast at a V100.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Voyager

Silver
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by Voyager » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:38 am

disco_barred wrote:As far as I know, nothing feeds into biglaw litigation except biglaw litigation. You could probably lateral into some kind of regulatory / government affairs / anti-trust / financial industry lobbying or consulting practice, I would imagine. But I've never heard of big law firms that make hires from agencies (excepting of course something like a Bristow Fellow, of course) or smaller law firms on a regular enough basis to provide concrete advice about how to make lightning strike twice.
So wrong. DOJ Honors program, SEC Honors program, AUSAs and clerkships ALL are in very high demand at top litigation practices.

ALL big firms love picking up SEC Honors guys. Hell, virtually the entire lit practice at Akin Gump is made up of partners that are former AUSAs/SEC dudes.

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by 270910 » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:45 am

Voyager wrote:
disco_barred wrote:As far as I know, nothing feeds into biglaw litigation except biglaw litigation. You could probably lateral into some kind of regulatory / government affairs / anti-trust / financial industry lobbying or consulting practice, I would imagine. But I've never heard of big law firms that make hires from agencies (excepting of course something like a Bristow Fellow, of course) or smaller law firms on a regular enough basis to provide concrete advice about how to make lightning strike twice.
So wrong. DOJ Honors program, SEC Honors program, AUSAs and clerkships ALL are in very high demand at top litigation practices.

ALL big firms love picking up SEC Honors guys. Hell, virtually the entire lit practice at Akin Gump is made up of partners that are former AUSAs/SEC dudes.
AUSA, DoJ honors, and clerkships pretty much require biglaw credentials and in many if not most if not all cases are careers one chooses instead of big law. OP makes it pretty clear that big law is not realistically on the table, so I'm not sure what relevance those programs have. I'll grant you that I was probably wrong about the SEC thing, my brain hasn't switched on this morning yet. But the other things you listed don't seem to plausibly be on OP's radar.

Voyager

Silver
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by Voyager » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:49 am

disco_barred wrote:
Voyager wrote:
disco_barred wrote:As far as I know, nothing feeds into biglaw litigation except biglaw litigation. You could probably lateral into some kind of regulatory / government affairs / anti-trust / financial industry lobbying or consulting practice, I would imagine. But I've never heard of big law firms that make hires from agencies (excepting of course something like a Bristow Fellow, of course) or smaller law firms on a regular enough basis to provide concrete advice about how to make lightning strike twice.
So wrong. DOJ Honors program, SEC Honors program, AUSAs and clerkships ALL are in very high demand at top litigation practices.

ALL big firms love picking up SEC Honors guys. Hell, virtually the entire lit practice at Akin Gump is made up of partners that are former AUSAs/SEC dudes.
AUSA, DoJ honors, and clerkships pretty much require biglaw credentials and in many if not most if not all cases are careers one chooses instead of big law. OP makes it pretty clear that big law is not realistically on the table, so I'm not sure what relevance those programs have. I'll grant you that I was probably wrong about the SEC thing, my brain hasn't switched on this morning yet. But the other things you listed don't seem to plausibly be on OP's radar.
I was just pointing out that big law lit shops DO, in fact, hire from gov agencies. The SEC produces people that are in high demand. If he has an opportunity to go there, he should take it. He will then be able to move to the private sector as the securities expert at the firm.... and if he decides that he wants to get involved in prosecution, he will have a relatively easy time moving to a U.S. Attorney's office.

User avatar
YCrevolution

Gold
Posts: 3854
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by YCrevolution » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:55 am

..

Renzo

Gold
Posts: 4249
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: MidLaw vs. SEC

Post by Renzo » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:22 pm

YCrevolution wrote:
That said, SEC Honors Program is pretty hard to get.
Right.

The setup for this thread is that someone has an offer for SEC honors and couldn't crack biglaw? Really?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”