Interviews w/ Litigation Firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432181
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
Eventually I want to be a prosecutor - its basically why i went to law school. The only reason why I want to work at a firm is so I can gain experience to become a prosecutor. What do I say in interviews - if I tell them the truth is that a total turnoff?
PLEASE HELP!
PLEASE HELP!
- eandy
- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
Working in a biglaw firm is not going to get you practical experience that will help you be a prosecutor.
-
- Posts: 432181
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
Every prosecutor (federal) i have spoken with recommended working for a top litigation firm.
Any thoughts on my actual question?
Any thoughts on my actual question?
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
.
Last edited by NYAssociate on Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:57 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
Replace "prosecutor" with "litigator". There should be at least a few things that appeal to you about being a prosecutor that also apply to general litigation. Focus on those.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:44 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
and yet, this is the path many prosecutors take to land where they do.eandy wrote:Working in a biglaw firm is not going to get you practical experience that will help you be a prosecutor.
-
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:50 am
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
+1, and if there isn't, you're not thinking hard enough.famlawatty wrote:Replace "prosecutor" with "litigator". There should be at least a few things that appeal to you about being a prosecutor that also apply to general litigation. Focus on those.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
I don't understand why you would work in a litigation department doing civil stuff and getting practically no courtroom experience when your goal is to be a criminal prosecutor. That makes no sense to me. Work at a DA's office or intern for the US Atty's office. Don't sit around writing memos and maybe attending a deposition in your second year just to try to gain marginal experience doing the work you want.
If you want to get money and SOME marginal experience, just be honest with yourself. There's nothing wrong with that tack. The better option for hands-on experience would be following the path I just outlined.
If you want to get money and SOME marginal experience, just be honest with yourself. There's nothing wrong with that tack. The better option for hands-on experience would be following the path I just outlined.
-
- Posts: 432181
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
I get what you are saying but unfortunately for some reason US Atty's Office look for biglaw lit experience. For example, SDNY won't even hire from Manhattan DA (although EDNY will). It makes no sense to me since you rarely get the trial experience but there are a lot of connections in biglaw (former AUSA's).como wrote:I don't understand why you would work in a litigation department doing civil stuff and getting practically no courtroom experience when your goal is to be a criminal prosecutor. That makes no sense to me. Work at a DA's office or intern for the US Atty's office. Don't sit around writing memos and maybe attending a deposition in your second year just to try to gain marginal experience doing the work you want.
If you want to get money and SOME marginal experience, just be honest with yourself. There's nothing wrong with that tack. The better option for hands-on experience would be following the path I just outlined.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: Interviews w/ Litigation Firms
Have you ever considered a different district? I am certain that NDNY does not require biglaw lit experience. A little experience there and you could maybe move to a different district.Anonymous User wrote:I get what you are saying but unfortunately for some reason US Atty's Office look for biglaw lit experience. For example, SDNY won't even hire from Manhattan DA (although EDNY will). It makes no sense to me since you rarely get the trial experience but there are a lot of connections in biglaw (former AUSA's).como wrote:I don't understand why you would work in a litigation department doing civil stuff and getting practically no courtroom experience when your goal is to be a criminal prosecutor. That makes no sense to me. Work at a DA's office or intern for the US Atty's office. Don't sit around writing memos and maybe attending a deposition in your second year just to try to gain marginal experience doing the work you want.
If you want to get money and SOME marginal experience, just be honest with yourself. There's nothing wrong with that tack. The better option for hands-on experience would be following the path I just outlined.