Columbia Law Review Calls Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Columbia Law Review Calls
Has anyone heard from the Columbia Review today about membership? The official calendar says that calls go out tomorrow but other materials say today. I have heard some reports that a decison was made to make calls today--but I don't know how reliable they are.
I am posting this anonymously only because I know some people are senstive about discussing law review selection, especially since it has some bearing on employment prospects.
I am posting this anonymously only because I know some people are senstive about discussing law review selection, especially since it has some bearing on employment prospects.
- Cavalier
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
AutoAdmit has a thread on this subject: --LinkRemoved--
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
Yeah, I saw that. I tend to find the people who post there to be more unreliable than here. No offense to anyone who does. That site just seems to attract a lot of misinformation compared to this one. That is why I posted here.
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
Calls have started and will be continuing throughout the day.
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
This site seems to attract a high performing bunch of students. So who on here as gottten a call? Let's see how many people on TLS made it on to the Columbia Law Review. Post anonymously if you want but only post once so we have an accurate count.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
So on AutoAdmit someone has reported that almost all of the calls have been made. So no one on TLS has actually gotten the nod?
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
Someone I work with at the doj got the call about half an hour ago
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, clerkship, etc.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
eh... it's still sensitive info. and people need the anonymous feature so they can continue to lie!ggocat wrote:Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, clerkship, etc.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
To be fair, people are probably using the anonymous feature to avoid looking lame for announcing their happy news/asking anxious questions.
That said, I'm not sure what the majorly big deal is about letting the thread openly know. It's not like it won't be known who made LR once 2L begins.
That said, I'm not sure what the majorly big deal is about letting the thread openly know. It's not like it won't be known who made LR once 2L begins.
- let/them/eat/cake
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:20 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
i wanted to +1 the first statement and then realized after reading the second that it was indeed the credited response. by using the anon feature u'd just be delaying the knowledge by a matter of like weeks.dresden doll wrote:To be fair, people are probably using the anonymous feature to avoid looking lame for announcing their happy news/asking anxious questions.
That said, I'm not sure what the majorly big deal is about letting the thread openly know. It's not like it won't be known who made LR once 2L begins.
on that note:
"i switched the coolers" "so, what, it saved you like, a second?"
Go!
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
clear that you don't go to Columbiadresden doll wrote:To be fair, people are probably using the anonymous feature to avoid looking lame for announcing their happy news/asking anxious questions.

-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
lolwhat? people on xoxo have been using the anonymous feature to pretend phone calls went out since last night. it's definitely used, in part, to make things up and make people paranoid.let/them/eat/cake wrote:i wanted to +1 the first statement and then realized after reading the second that it was indeed the credited response. by using the anon feature u'd just be delaying the knowledge by a matter of like weeks.dresden doll wrote:To be fair, people are probably using the anonymous feature to avoid looking lame for announcing their happy news/asking anxious questions.
That said, I'm not sure what the majorly big deal is about letting the thread openly know. It's not like it won't be known who made LR once 2L begins.
on that note:
"i switched the coolers" "so, what, it saved you like, a second?"
Go!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
Yes, I'm basically just intruding on this thread to preemptively compare its relative peacefulness to the clusterfuck that will erupt once LR calls start going out at my dear rigorous Chicago.Anonymous User wrote:clear that you don't go to Columbiadresden doll wrote:To be fair, people are probably using the anonymous feature to avoid looking lame for announcing their happy news/asking anxious questions.
As for the anonymous feature, I tend to think that TLS users are a little less prone to abusing it relative to xoxo posters. I could certainly be wrong, though.
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
So it's definite? All calls have gone out?
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
I think so.Anonymous User wrote:So it's definite? All calls have gone out?
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
you'll be relieved when your journal's time commitment isn't 25 hours/week.Anonymous User wrote:Sigh.
-
- Posts: 431999
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
did these all go out through phone calls? no snail mail?
- steve_nash
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
or 40 if you've got an exec position! sigh. law review is a blessing and a curse.booyakasha wrote:you'll be relieved when your journal's time commitment isn't 25 hours/week.Anonymous User wrote:Sigh.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
your life sounds so tragic.steve_nash wrote:or 40 if you've got an exec position! sigh. law review is a blessing and a curse.booyakasha wrote:you'll be relieved when your journal's time commitment isn't 25 hours/week.Anonymous User wrote:Sigh.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- steve_nash
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
true, that was obnoxious.booyakasha wrote:your life sounds so tragic.steve_nash wrote:or 40 if you've got an exec position! sigh. law review is a blessing and a curse.booyakasha wrote:you'll be relieved when your journal's time commitment isn't 25 hours/week.Anonymous User wrote:Sigh.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia Law Review Calls
it's okay, people at TTTs need to reaffirm their accomplishments in threads that have nothing to do with them.steve_nash wrote:true, that was obnoxious.booyakasha wrote:your life sounds so tragic.steve_nash wrote:or 40 if you've got an exec position! sigh. law review is a blessing and a curse.booyakasha wrote: you'll be relieved when your journal's time commitment isn't 25 hours/week.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login