Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Sauer Grapes
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
The employment struggles of those looking to find work in large markets such as NY, DC, Chicago, CA, etc have been well publicized. It's no secret that the secondary markets aren't exactly thriving either. However, there seems to be less news about the actual state of secondary and tertiary legal markets (as would logically be expected).
That being said, are secondary markets, on average, hurting in relative proportion to the larger markets, or are they hurting more or less? I understand the VAST majority of those on TLS are looking for big law jobs in the major markets, but for those of us that don't mind the thought of working at a national firm in a smaller market, are we equally as screwed as everyone else, or more or less so?
That being said, are secondary markets, on average, hurting in relative proportion to the larger markets, or are they hurting more or less? I understand the VAST majority of those on TLS are looking for big law jobs in the major markets, but for those of us that don't mind the thought of working at a national firm in a smaller market, are we equally as screwed as everyone else, or more or less so?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
I'll bump this for my good man Sauer Grapes. I'm also very interested in this.
- MorningHood
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:16 am
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
I think the only way to answer this is through published statistics... is there a place where we could find this information?
- Mickey Quicknumbers
- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:22 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Intuitively, it would seem that if most law students shifted to their safeties or lower for hiring based on biglaw woes, it would make midlaw for those who usually targeted/reached for it even worse than biglaw. As far as the actual shrinking of new jobs, I have no clue 
tl;dr version: bump

tl;dr version: bump
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Could go one of three ways:
1. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are strong and thus are insulated from the shit economy.
2. Secondary markets barely justified their existence because of the the real estate boom. Their home industries are nonexistent and thus the market itself is decimated. OR
3. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are also in the shit and thus are worse off than primary markets.
1. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are strong and thus are insulated from the shit economy.
2. Secondary markets barely justified their existence because of the the real estate boom. Their home industries are nonexistent and thus the market itself is decimated. OR
3. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are also in the shit and thus are worse off than primary markets.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Rrrrreally now... The entire legal industry depends on the real estate market?motiontodismiss wrote:Could go one of three ways:
1. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are strong and thus are insulated from the shit economy.
2. Secondary markets barely justified their existence because of the the real estate boom. Their home industries are nonexistent and thus the market itself is decimated. OR
3. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are also in the shit and thus are worse off than primary markets.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Depends on the secondary market I guess (subtle bump).
- Matthies
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
No. The only way to answer this is by talking to actual lawyers in the markets your interested in.MorningHood wrote:I think the only way to answer this is through published statistics... is there a place where we could find this information?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Which I'm doing in an hour.Matthies wrote:No. The only way to answer this is by talking to actual lawyers in the markets your interested in.MorningHood wrote:I think the only way to answer this is through published statistics... is there a place where we could find this information?

- Sauer Grapes
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Please do let me know how it goes/went. STL is still one of my locations of interest.romothesavior wrote:Which I'm doing in an hour.Matthies wrote:No. The only way to answer this is by talking to actual lawyers in the markets your interested in.MorningHood wrote:I think the only way to answer this is through published statistics... is there a place where we could find this information?I'll let you know how it goes.
- NoleinNY
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
0L just making assumptions/observations:romothesavior wrote:Rrrrreally now... The entire legal industry depends on the real estate market?motiontodismiss wrote:Could go one of three ways:
1. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are strong and thus are insulated from the shit economy.
2. Secondary markets barely justified their existence because of the the real estate boom. Their home industries are nonexistent and thus the market itself is decimated. OR
3. Secondary markets supported themselves independently of the real estate boom. Their home industries are also in the shit and thus are worse off than primary markets.
Not entirely dependent. Depending on the specific market, however, it would be reasonable to imagine the health of lenders and real estate sales having a cascading effect on their legal industries.
1. Example: ???
2. Example: South Florida
3. Example: Detroit
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
As others have said, it likely depends on the particular area.
Anecdotally, I think smaller markets have done better. Firms in smaller markets (not even secondary markets--think 100K-300K people) near me have continued to hire normally while biglaw dramatically cut back. These firms only hire a handful of people every year, but they've continued at their normal pace.
Anecdotally, I think smaller markets have done better. Firms in smaller markets (not even secondary markets--think 100K-300K people) near me have continued to hire normally while biglaw dramatically cut back. These firms only hire a handful of people every year, but they've continued at their normal pace.
- Scallywaggums
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:52 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
So?romothesavior wrote: Which I'm doing in an hour.I'll let you know how it goes.
Thx ggocat.
Hopefully this bump will generate more input.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432575
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
I'm at a firm in NYC. The work here has definitely picked up since last year, according to associates I've spoken with.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Spill it, romo. I need to know whether STL is gonna be a viable option in a year or two. By the by, did you happen to ask your sources about any other currently relevant topics... like saaaay... the hypothetical pros and cons inherent to Bears and Wolverines?romothesavior wrote:Which I'm doing in an hour.Matthies wrote:No. The only way to answer this is by talking to actual lawyers in the markets your interested in.MorningHood wrote:I think the only way to answer this is through published statistics... is there a place where we could find this information?I'll let you know how it goes.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
Romo was in killself mode earlier. Guess how it went.stratocophic wrote:Spill it, romo. I need to know whether STL is gonna be a viable option in a year or two. By the by, did you happen to ask your sources about any other currently relevant topics... like saaaay... the hypothetical pros and cons inherent to Bears and Wolverines?
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
--ImageRemoved--rad law wrote:Romo was in killself mode earlier. Guess how it went.stratocophic wrote:Spill it, romo. I need to know whether STL is gonna be a viable option in a year or two. By the by, did you happen to ask your sources about any other currently relevant topics... like saaaay... the hypothetical pros and cons inherent to Bears and Wolverines?
- Scallywaggums
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:52 pm
Re: Who's hurting worse, big markets or secondary/tertiary?
reddit has been breached
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login