Columbia ITE - OCI 2009 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
-------------------------------------
I cannot provide additional details or respond to questions.
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
-------------------------------------
I cannot provide additional details or respond to questions.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:02 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
Not as bad as I was expecting. Right?Anonymous User wrote:# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
-------------------------------------
I cannot provide additional details or respond to questions.
- underachiever
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:09 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
WORSE!swester wrote:Not as bad as I was expecting. Right?Anonymous User wrote:# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~270 (67.5%)
V10 Placement: 77 (19.25%)
For comparison, 2006 stats:
# of 2L participants (including transfers): ~400
# of 2L's who got at least 1 offer: ~390 (97.5%)
V10 Placement: 134 (33.5%)
-------------------------------------
I cannot provide additional details or respond to questions.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
this data is just from their early interview program and does not include firm jobs acquired through the smaller fall OCI as well through other means.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:12 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
seeing as how the markets in most places shrunk by 40-60% according to NALP numbers this looks about right.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
as mentioned before, this data concerns only the results of CLS' early interview program (august). i have no data about how many 2Ls don't have any jobs lined up at this point, 8 months later.legends159 wrote:seeing as how the markets in most places shrunk by 40-60% according to NALP numbers this looks about right.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs and one was just downright lazy.
- ZXCVBNM
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:45 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
those 2 2l's must be thrilled the dean is annoucing that during asw. they must feel like shmucks.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
This was as of ASW, not for the OCI. It was probably something like 90% or so.legends159 wrote:seeing as how the markets in most places shrunk by 40-60% according to NALP numbers this looks about right.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
From what I hear, the numbers are considerably better now. OCS put some serious effort into helping out 2Ls who struck out at EIP (OCI). I'd be curious to hear how many 2Ls have jobs for the summer (and I mean paying jobs, unless they actually wanted PI/gov't work), but I'm willing to bet it's way more than 68% of the class. I also think that poor bidding did a significant number of people in, which might do something to explain the offer rate. I've heard that some people just bid way too aggressively considering the economy (perhaps not yet fully appreciating the shitstorm in the legal market), and that others dumped their bids into tough markets (DC, CA without ties to the region, etc).Anonymous User wrote:as mentioned before, this data concerns only the results of CLS' early interview program (august). i have no data about how many 2Ls don't have any jobs lined up at this point, 8 months later.legends159 wrote:seeing as how the markets in most places shrunk by 40-60% according to NALP numbers this looks about right.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs and one was just downright lazy.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
Hey OP - how did you get the 400 figure for 2L participants? Does it say somewhere in our booklet? (I'm a CLS student as well)
I thought we had just shy of 400 1Ls and about 60 transfers - are you assuming 15% of the class didn't do EIP?
I thought we had just shy of 400 1Ls and about 60 transfers - are you assuming 15% of the class didn't do EIP?
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
This is just EIP, which is just large firms. As others have said there's also Fall OCI, mail-in campaigns, and public interest/gov't.legends159 wrote:seeing as how the markets in most places shrunk by 40-60% according to NALP numbers this looks about right.
As a point of comparison (b/c I've seen some people call SLS and CLS peer schools now b/c of the USNWR repuatitonal scores) Dean Kramer said during ASW that there are 2 2L who don't have jobs.
The quote I've heard is sitting around 95% with jobs (any jobs) for the 2L class this summer.
-
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:02 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
This is sobering but not all that surprising. CCN no longer = auto-BigLaw. The data really highlights just how stratified hiring has become. 20% of the class got V10 offers and 33% got nothing.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
wow, better than i expected
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
Obviously OP posted anon b/c Columbia students were not supposed to share those stats. NYU had the same meeting, and we were given the same instructions (hence anonymous post).
But I can say that NYU's EIW percentage w/ offers is higher than Columbia's for C/O 2011 (EIW/OCI 2009). Not by a whole lot, but still very surprising considering NYU is supposedly the more public interest geared school and Columbia is the big firm geared school.
But I can say that NYU's EIW percentage w/ offers is higher than Columbia's for C/O 2011 (EIW/OCI 2009). Not by a whole lot, but still very surprising considering NYU is supposedly the more public interest geared school and Columbia is the big firm geared school.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
twistedwrister wrote:This is sobering but not all that surprising. CCN no longer = auto-BigLaw. The data really highlights just how stratified hiring has become. 20% of the class got V10 offers and 33% got nothing.
Just when you thought law school couldn't get any more stressful... (as noted, these numbers are inflated - Columbia has more like 450+ students after transfers)
- Unemployed
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
1. As everyone else mentioned, EIP is followed by "Fall OCI" which results in additional jobs.
2. Numbers are not inflated. Normal class size at Columbia is 370, not 400 (c/o 2012 is an exception), and not everyone participates in EIP.
3. Funny enough, they did not explicitly prohibit us from sharing.
4. I see a great deal of bid/interview mismatches - Some firms with 120 interview spots only got 140 bids, while others with only 40 spots got 200+ bids, etc.
2. Numbers are not inflated. Normal class size at Columbia is 370, not 400 (c/o 2012 is an exception), and not everyone participates in EIP.
3. Funny enough, they did not explicitly prohibit us from sharing.
4. I see a great deal of bid/interview mismatches - Some firms with 120 interview spots only got 140 bids, while others with only 40 spots got 200+ bids, etc.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
I have the 2006 data, which will make this a much better comparison.
In 2006, 388 2Ls accepted offers from EIP.
[Edit for 'whoops, looks like that was in the OP'.] I can confirm though that it was 388 accepted offers, not 388 with at least one offer (though the numbers would likely be close to one another)
In 2006, 388 2Ls accepted offers from EIP.
[Edit for 'whoops, looks like that was in the OP'.] I can confirm though that it was 388 accepted offers, not 388 with at least one offer (though the numbers would likely be close to one another)
- Unemployed
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
I guess the same distinction should be made for the 2009 stats. For 2009, I count 266 total offers accepted, but there are three popular employers who are marked as "0 offers" because they did not provide any data - I guess it's reasonable to assume at least one person accepted an offer from each.Anonymous User wrote:I have the 2006 data, which will make this a much better comparison.
In 2006, 388 2Ls accepted offers from EIP.
[Edit for 'whoops, looks like that was in the OP'.] I can confirm though that it was 388 accepted offers, not 388 with at least one offer (though the numbers would likely be close to one another)
Edit: I am aware that I should probably change my handle before I speak further on the issue.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
As Unemployed pointed out, your assessment is almost certainly incorrect. Every year, there's a decent chunk of the class that doesn't do EIP. Based on historical trends, I'd say estimating ~400 people did EIP is reasonable, or perhaps even a little on the high side.disco_barred wrote:these numbers are inflated - Columbia has more like 450+ students after transfers
Any NYUers care to leak more data? I'd be interested to see. A few questions:
1. Is your percentage rounded? If so, CLS and NYU have essentially identical percentages (both round to 70%). [Edit: the cross-references the number provided here: http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thr ... ba20249c1c]
2. Is your number the percentage of the *entire class* that got a job through OCI, or is it the percentage of the *people participating in OCI* who got a job through OCI? These are very, very different stats.
3. Does your OCI percentage include jobs obtained during some later OCI process, such as fall or winter OCI (if NYU has such a thing)? The Columbia #s are only for EIP, and do not include Fall OCI, resume drops, etc.
4. Does your OCI percentage include PI/gov't jobs? Columbia students doing PI/gov't work go through fall OCI or a separate application process.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
OK. Just curious, but are we assuming that 2010 is going to be the "worst" year to graduate from law school? Or is the consensus that "it's just going to keep getting worse?"
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DerrickRose
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:08 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
The real consensus is that no one has any idea.Anonymous User wrote:OK. Just curious, but are we assuming that 2010 is going to be the "worst" year to graduate from law school? Or is the consensus that "it's just going to keep getting worse?"
But the working thought is that fall '10 OCI is going to be a little better than fall '09 OCI, and we'll go from there.
- MeTalkPrettyOneDay
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:42 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
Agreed. The hope is that '10 OCI (class of '12) will be better than '09 OCI (class of '11), and that summer offer rates (percentage of SAs that turn into jobs) for the class of '11 will be better than the offer rates the class of '10 had.DerrickRose wrote:The real consensus is that no one has any idea.Anonymous User wrote:OK. Just curious, but are we assuming that 2010 is going to be the "worst" year to graduate from law school? Or is the consensus that "it's just going to keep getting worse?"
But the working thought is that fall '10 OCI is going to be a little better than fall '09 OCI, and we'll go from there.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
I'm a cls 2L with no job. I gave up a free ride and a #1 ranking to come here. Traded no debt and no job for prestigious debt and no job. I hate my life.
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:12 pm
Re: Columbia ITE - OCI 2009
sorry to hear that. It seems that quite a few transfers to non-HYS got burned during OCI. Have you tried mass mailing? I wouldn't wait for 3L OCI if I were you
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login