latest OCI stats from lower tier 1 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- truthypants
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:50 am
latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
-Most students don't get their jobs through fall recruiting (OCI, resume collections, off-campus programs)
-Largest firms (700+) median number of offers dropped from 30 in 2007 to 18.5 in 2008 to 8 in 2009
-In Fall 2009, only 36.4% of callback interviews resulted in an offer. (2008: 46.6%; 2007: 60%+)
-Only 3% of firms recruited for 3L students in 2009 (2008: 25%; 2007 42%)
that's the lates OCI stats from George Mason (ranked 42). I imagine lower ranked schools have worse prospects and higher ranked schools have better prospects. Hope it helps. Feel free to post other schools employment stats here--i'm curious to see how other schools are faring.
-Largest firms (700+) median number of offers dropped from 30 in 2007 to 18.5 in 2008 to 8 in 2009
-In Fall 2009, only 36.4% of callback interviews resulted in an offer. (2008: 46.6%; 2007: 60%+)
-Only 3% of firms recruited for 3L students in 2009 (2008: 25%; 2007 42%)
that's the lates OCI stats from George Mason (ranked 42). I imagine lower ranked schools have worse prospects and higher ranked schools have better prospects. Hope it helps. Feel free to post other schools employment stats here--i'm curious to see how other schools are faring.
- zeth006
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:54 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
^ This
Doesn't look good, that I can tell you!
Doesn't look good, that I can tell you!
- XxSpyKEx
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
Typically schools won't post up stats in bad years like this because they want to avoid stuff like what % of their students actually got offers from firms showing up on message boards and abovethelaw essentially trashing the school, when the reality is that is just as bad at comparable schools.truthypants wrote:-Most students don't get their jobs through fall recruiting (OCI, resume collections, off-campus programs)
-Largest firms (700+) median number of offers dropped from 30 in 2007 to 18.5 in 2008 to 8 in 2009
-In Fall 2009, only 36.4% of callback interviews resulted in an offer. (2008: 46.6%; 2007: 60%+)
-Only 3% of firms recruited for 3L students in 2009 (2008: 25%; 2007 42%)
that's the lates OCI stats from George Mason (ranked 42). I imagine lower ranked schools have worse prospects and higher ranked schools have better prospects. Hope it helps. Feel free to post other schools employment stats here--i'm curious to see how other schools are faring.
Those 3L recruiting numbers are shocking though. Just based on this last year I was under the impression that 3L recruiting just never existed (which is obviously not true if almost half the firms were recruiting in 2007 OCI).
- bwv812
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
.
Last edited by bwv812 on Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- doinmybest
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:59 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
Do we have access to the latest T14 OCI stats? From what I understand they don't seem to be too far behind these stats.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
Nope, and who knows if we ever will. Schools have a lot of incentive to be vague here.doinmybest wrote:Do we have access to the latest T14 OCI stats?
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
The 36% callback offers is pretty rough. I think that is the most shocking issue there.
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:05 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
And from what I have heard, that is not likely to have translated to a 36% per person. It seems that last year it was largely feast or famine at many schools. So while 36% of all screening interviews resulted in callbacks, it may very well have been that the same small group of students got most of them.rando wrote:The 36% callback offers is pretty rough. I think that is the most shocking issue there.
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
Yep.LurkerNoMore wrote:And from what I have heard, that is not likely to have translated to a 36% per person. It seems that last year it was largely feast or famine at many schools. So while 36% of all screening interviews resulted in callbacks, it may very well have been that the same small group of students got most of them.rando wrote:The 36% callback offers is pretty rough. I think that is the most shocking issue there.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
But isn't that the percentage of callbacks becoming offers?
That seems to confirm the theory that though firms stepped up their standards on grades, the increase in selectivity based on personality/fit was even more significant.
That seems to confirm the theory that though firms stepped up their standards on grades, the increase in selectivity based on personality/fit was even more significant.
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
Meaning that the same people got all the offers but obviously didn't accept them all.RVP11 wrote:But isn't that the percentage of callbacks becoming offers?
That seems to confirm the theory that though firms stepped up their standards on grades, the increase in selectivity based on personality/fit was even more significant.
And yes, the selection process got markedly more competitive.
-
- Posts: 431993
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
-Largest firms (700+) median number of offers dropped from 30 in 2007 to 18.5 in 2008 to 8 in 2009
I feel sorry for the 0.5 person here. Is this person just "half" of a George Mason student, or did s/he get "half" an offer?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431993
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
These are not George Mason's stats. Instead, they appear to be the NALP statistics reported on the NALP website for national 2L recruiting numbers.
-
- Posts: 431993
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: latest OCI stats from lower tier 1
lol... Only in law school.Anonymous User wrote:-Largest firms (700+) median number of offers dropped from 30 in 2007 to 18.5 in 2008 to 8 in 2009
I feel sorry for the 0.5 person here. Is this person just "half" of a George Mason student, or did s/he get "half" an offer?
It was just an even number of people in the sample so they averaged the 2 numbers.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login