Stupid Question Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Stupid Question
What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
-
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm
Re: Stupid Question
I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Stupid Question
Insurance defense.CyLaw wrote:I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
-
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:29 pm
Re: Stupid Question
Interior DesignCyLaw wrote:I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Stupid Question
Infectious DiseaseHBK wrote:Interior DesignCyLaw wrote:I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:16 pm
Re: Stupid Question
There's nothing inherently wrong with it. Like any other area of law I can think up a gazillion ways that it could get sleazy, but it definitely doesn't have to be that way.
I hear that the hours a bit more than government but not terrible.
Career services pretty much never even mentions it as a possibility. Maybe people think it limits options in a way that biglaw doesn't? Also, the pay cut is pretty huge compared to Big law and unlike other lower-paying law jobs (public interest, plaintiff-side lit, government...) you don't get to feel like you're doing something righteous, at least not in the traditional sense.
I hear that the hours a bit more than government but not terrible.
Career services pretty much never even mentions it as a possibility. Maybe people think it limits options in a way that biglaw doesn't? Also, the pay cut is pretty huge compared to Big law and unlike other lower-paying law jobs (public interest, plaintiff-side lit, government...) you don't get to feel like you're doing something righteous, at least not in the traditional sense.
-
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:50 am
Re: Stupid Question
It has something to do with your ego and super-ego.CyLaw wrote:I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
- pany1985
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:08 am
Re: Stupid Question
Unless it means working less than 1/2 of typical biglaw hours, most people probably won't want to do it if they can get a job with a higher effective hourly rate... and a lot of students from the top schools can.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Stupid Question
But still, if you strike out at biglaw OCI it seems like a decent option, que no? And don't most truly righteous PI gigs require a few years of lit exp anyways? What better way to get lots of responsibility early while still having a decent QOL?BetterCallSaul wrote:There's nothing inherently wrong with it. Like any other area of law I can think up a gazillion ways that it could get sleazy, but it definitely doesn't have to be that way.
I hear that the hours a bit more than government but not terrible.
Career services pretty much never even mentions it as a possibility. Maybe people think it limits options in a way that biglaw doesn't? Also, the pay cut is pretty huge compared to Big law and unlike other lower-paying law jobs (public interest, plaintiff-side lit, government...) you don't get to feel like you're doing something righteous, at least not in the traditional sense.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:16 pm
Re: Stupid Question
I'm with you. seems like an underutilized option for t-14ers.Veyron wrote:But still, if you strike out at biglaw OCI it seems like a decent option, que no? And don't most truly righteous PI gigs require a few years of lit exp anyways? What better way to get lots of responsibility early while still having a decent QOL?BetterCallSaul wrote:There's nothing inherently wrong with it. Like any other area of law I can think up a gazillion ways that it could get sleazy, but it definitely doesn't have to be that way.
I hear that the hours a bit more than government but not terrible.
Career services pretty much never even mentions it as a possibility. Maybe people think it limits options in a way that biglaw doesn't? Also, the pay cut is pretty huge compared to Big law and unlike other lower-paying law jobs (public interest, plaintiff-side lit, government...) you don't get to feel like you're doing something righteous, at least not in the traditional sense.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Stupid Question
^ Yah, do you think it might have something to do with them wanting to hire people from the local TTT who are less of a risk to jump ship or them wanting to hire people with exp in the field?
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:16 pm
Re: Stupid Question
Veyron wrote:^ Yah, do you think it might have something to do with them wanting to hire people from the local TTT who are less of a risk to jump ship or them wanting to hire people with exp in the field?
I really don't think t-14ers are applying for those jobs and I don't really know what would happen if they did...I mean, I think the decent ID firms are used to getting people from T2s and T3s who either have a few years experience working for peanuts somewhere else or who made law review and did some state clerkship. Who knows if they'd trade who they're currently hiring for ivy leaguers below the median... ?
Edit: But I don't want to discourage anyone from going for it.

-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Stupid Question
I have never heard anything that makes me think ID firms commonly include lots of court time, 75K starting salaries, and upward mobility. If those things were true, it would be a fine option. And maybe they are... but those are hardly the stats I usually hear quoted for ID work.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:16 pm
Re: Stupid Question
What do you usually hear?disco_barred wrote:I have never heard anything that makes me think ID firms commonly include lots of court time, 75K starting salaries, and upward mobility. If those things were true, it would be a fine option. And maybe they are... but those are hardly the stats I usually hear quoted for ID work.
- BigFatPanda
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:47 am
Re: Stupid Question
Intelligent Design--sugar coated creationism where god created Earth 6000 years agoCyLaw wrote:I have a stupid question: What is ID?Veyron wrote:What is so bad about ID? 75k starting with decent upwards mobility, the chance to be in court all the time, less hours (slightly) than biglaw, why don't moar T-14ers to this. I know I have to be missing something...
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Stupid Question
Employees may be willing to sacrifice a higher hourly rate to work fewer overall hours. The more hours an employee works, the more valuable those hours become.pany1985 wrote:Unless it means working less than 1/2 of typical biglaw hours, most people probably won't want to do it if they can get a job with a higher effective hourly rate... and a lot of students from the top schools can.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Stupid Question
TBF, trials are rare but settlement conferences and motion arguing seem moar common than in biglaw. The better ID firms in CA do start circa 75k. Yah, and it also seems more people would be willing to make the time v. $ tradeoff.disco_barred wrote:I have never heard anything that makes me think ID firms commonly include lots of court time, 75K starting salaries, and upward mobility. If those things were true, it would be a fine option. And maybe they are... but those are hardly the stats I usually hear quoted for ID work.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login