0L Employment Sub-Forum? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
SweetnessUVA
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:08 pm
0L Employment Sub-Forum?
... and I'm saying this as a 0L.
-
coherentowst
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:53 pm
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
There are no jobs.
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
0L's should abide by an "ask, don't tell" policy in this forum. 100% of 0L contributions are wrong and a waste of the internet. Questions, however, are much less offensive.betasteve wrote:To whatever extent that 0Ls need to be aware of specific employment circumstances, they can read the employment forum, and ask questions in the Discuss Your Law School, Law School Admissions, and Choosing a Law School thread.
-
roadkilllaw
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:07 am
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
Renzo wrote:0L's should abide by an "ask, don't tell" policy in this forum. 100% of 0L contributions are wrong and a waste of the internet. Questions, however, are much less offensive.betasteve wrote:To whatever extent that 0Ls need to be aware of specific employment circumstances, they can read the employment forum, and ask questions in the Discuss Your Law School, Law School Admissions, and Choosing a Law School thread.
As a 0L, I think that 0L's should have a 0L indication in their names so ppl know to ignore us
-
TTT-LS
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
.
Last edited by TTT-LS on Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
underdawg
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
tbh there's a lot of 1L idiocy around here. like when 1L's comment on EIW/OCI. and probably 2L idiocy about how its actually like WORKING (not interviewing) at a firm. etc etc
we should just have freaking 0L/1L/2L/3L/3L+ etc badges next to our names. some of the very 1L's berating 0L's for talking are saying some stupid shit themselves
we should just have freaking 0L/1L/2L/3L/3L+ etc badges next to our names. some of the very 1L's berating 0L's for talking are saying some stupid shit themselves
Last edited by underdawg on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
tome
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
Maybe we should just have a blanket ban on posting.
-
Renzo
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
I say all kinds of stupid shit, but I do it in the off-topic forum. I don't go into the "choosing a law school" forum and just start making up random facts to spread misinformation. If I did, it would ruin the usefulness of the forum, just like a bunch of know-nothings posting in this thread.underdawg wrote:tbh there's a lot of 1L idiocy around here. like when 1L's comment on EIW/OCI. and probably 2L idiocy about how its actually like WORKING (not interviewing) at a firm. etc etc
we should just have freaking 0L/1L/2L/3L/3L+ etc badges next to our names. some of the very 1L's berating 0L's for talking are saying some stupid shit themselves
-
Snuffie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: 0L Employment Sub-Forum?
Unless you're going to confirm someone's status, then the badges are a complete waste of time. The people who would freely admit to being 0Ls are likely to be those who aren't (knowingly) dispensing bullshit.Renzo wrote:I say all kinds of stupid shit, but I do it in the off-topic forum. I don't go into the "choosing a law school" forum and just start making up random facts to spread misinformation. If I did, it would ruin the usefulness of the forum, just like a bunch of know-nothings posting in this thread.underdawg wrote:tbh there's a lot of 1L idiocy around here. like when 1L's comment on EIW/OCI. and probably 2L idiocy about how its actually like WORKING (not interviewing) at a firm. etc etc
we should just have freaking 0L/1L/2L/3L/3L+ etc badges next to our names. some of the very 1L's berating 0L's for talking are saying some stupid shit themselves
I don't believe that reporting class rank by itself would solve this problem. In the end, none of the information on this forum should supplant due diligence.
In pursuit of full disclosure, I must profess that I am a 0L. I'm also 30 years old, and do not believe myself to be one of these problematic 0Ls under consideration. Take that for what it's worth.
