feeder judge terminology clarification Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
jayare

New
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:16 pm

feeder judge terminology clarification

Post by jayare » Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:33 pm

I keep reading "feeder judge" around the internet, what exactly does this mean?

(a judge whose clerks are more likely to get SCOTUS clerkships afterwards?)

User avatar
nealric

Moderator
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am

Re: feeder judge terminology clarification

Post by nealric » Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:12 pm

Certain judges place a large number of their clerks in the SCOUTS. They usually know SCOTUS justices and the justices trust their judgment about people.

It's increasingly the case that the SCOTUS doesn't take many people right out of law school, so a feeder judge clerkship is necessary to have a shot.

jayare

New
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:16 pm

Re: feeder judge terminology clarification

Post by jayare » Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:38 pm

nealric wrote:Certain judges place a large number of their clerks in the SCOUTS. They usually know SCOTUS justices and the justices trust their judgment about people.

It's increasingly the case that the SCOTUS doesn't take many people right out of law school, so a feeder judge clerkship is necessary to have a shot.

Thank you so much! :)

User avatar
Dick Whitman

Bronze
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:55 pm

Re: feeder judge terminology clarification

Post by Dick Whitman » Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:57 pm

nealric wrote:Certain judges place a large number of their clerks in the SCOUTS. They usually know SCOTUS justices and the justices trust their judgment about people.

It's increasingly the case that the SCOTUS doesn't take many people right out of law school, so a feeder judge clerkship is necessary to have a shot.
I'm almost certain the Supreme Court Justices don't take anyone straight out of law school.

I'm also pretty sure the feeder judges are all at the U.S. Court of Appeals level.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”