BC 2008 employment stats.. real??? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
--LinkRemoved--
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Yes. Its the graduating class of 2008. People were still getting high off of vapors from the real estate bubble.
Most schools' classes of 2008 did well.....

BTW, a good number of associates of this class got canned in December of 2008 when firms started tightening their belts.
EDIT: Quick ATL search got me this (--LinkRemoved--)
Most schools' classes of 2008 did well.....

BTW, a good number of associates of this class got canned in December of 2008 when firms started tightening their belts.
EDIT: Quick ATL search got me this (--LinkRemoved--)
Last edited by Space_Cowboy on Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
ah. okay. yeah, im sure many did. obviously i'm not going to either of these schools expecting anything close to those numbers. I'm just weighing BU/BC against fordham and those are the only statistics that are out. I guess they are pretty close then, right? BC seems to place a little bit more in clerkships though.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
oh whoops. totally right. thanks.rayiner wrote:That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Um.... It actually is 53% of the ENTIRE CLASS that got employed at a firm with 101+ attorneys. However, that cut-off is not necessarily Big Law.rayiner wrote:That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
- jchoggan
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:26 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Nope. Your original analysis was correct. It claims there are 67% of the entire class in law firms. 53% in big firms, 8% in small, and 6% in medium. 53+8+6 = 67. Either way, 37% might be more accurate ITE.AlanShore wrote:oh whoops. totally right. thanks.rayiner wrote:That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
ah okay. It probably is lower than 37% now.. but regardless I just wanted to compare general job prospects of boston schools vs fordham. I guess they are a little better.jchoggan wrote:Nope. Your original analysis was correct. It claims there are 67% of the entire class in law firms. 53% in big firms, 8% in small, and 6% in medium. 53+8+6 = 67. Either way, 37% might be more accurate ITE.AlanShore wrote:oh whoops. totally right. thanks.rayiner wrote:That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
true, i was wondering the same thing. i know BC places very well but these stats are a little TOO well in my opinion. maybe im just a pessimist..Corsair wrote:"*Students not seeking employment are not included in the percentages."
I'm curious how they decided that? Part of me suspects they just took everyone who was unemployed and declared "well these people must not be actually looking for jobs, so we won't count them."
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:50 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
About the same as Fordham's 2008 class, then. Very similar employment stats, and quite impressive before ITE.
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:32 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
.
Last edited by gollymolly on Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:50 am
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Yeah, they got crushed.gollymolly wrote:I remember some posts from earlier this year about how crazy low BC's success rate in OCI was, something like 20-30 students getting summer positions. I could be wrong though ...
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
did they get crushed harder than any of the other schools? if so, for what reason?Bankhead wrote:Yeah, they got crushed.gollymolly wrote:I remember some posts from earlier this year about how crazy low BC's success rate in OCI was, something like 20-30 students getting summer positions. I could be wrong though ...
20-30 students.. that seems a bit low..
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login