NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:45 pm

rpupkin never not doing work

User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:22 pm

rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20. Several prestigious firms are also founded/based in LA: Latham, O'Melveny, MTO, Irell, Gibson Dunn, Quinn Emanuel, etc.

Also, certain areas of LA are more expensive than NY. For instance, Century City (where STB is located) is ridiculously expnsive. Downtown LA is becoming quite pricey too.

Finally, "Silicon Beach" is becoming a thing in Santa Monica, and law firms are adapting accordingly. See Cooley.

No way LA doesn't match.

horns12

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:02 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by horns12 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:28 pm

Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.

KM2016

Bronze
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by KM2016 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:30 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20. Several prestigious firms are also founded/based in LA: Latham, O'Melveny, MTO, Irell, Gibson Dunn, Quinn Emanuel, etc.

Also, certain areas of LA are more expensive than NY. For instance, Century City (where STB is located) is ridiculously expnsive. Downtown LA is becoming quite pricey too.

Finally, "Silicon Beach" is becoming a thing in Santa Monica, and law firms are adapting accordingly. See Cooley.

No way LA doesn't match.
Agreed. I think there will be more than a handful of LA firms/LA offices of NY-based firms that match. I do think some of the smaller, less prestigious satellites won't match, but I think there certainly will be a large number of followers that move to $190k (i.e., MTO, Gibson, STB, Latham, O'Melveny, Quinn, Kirkland, Skadden, Milbank, Irell, W&C, etc.).

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by SplitMyPants » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:31 pm

Cobretti wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
Durham to 190

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:34 pm

Also, did you not see the STB document? LA to 190k

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:37 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 03152016 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:38 pm

instride91 wrote:LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:38 pm

instride91 wrote:LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20. Several prestigious firms are also founded/based in LA: Latham, O'Melveny, MTO, Irell, Gibson Dunn, Quinn Emanuel, etc.

Also, certain areas of LA are more expensive than NY. For instance, Century City (where STB is located) is ridiculously expnsive. Downtown LA is becoming quite pricey too.

Finally, "Silicon Beach" is becoming a thing in Santa Monica, and law firms are adapting accordingly. See Cooley.

No way LA doesn't match.
MODS PLS

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:39 pm

KM2016 wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20. Several prestigious firms are also founded/based in LA: Latham, O'Melveny, MTO, Irell, Gibson Dunn, Quinn Emanuel, etc.

Also, certain areas of LA are more expensive than NY. For instance, Century City (where STB is located) is ridiculously expnsive. Downtown LA is becoming quite pricey too.

Finally, "Silicon Beach" is becoming a thing in Santa Monica, and law firms are adapting accordingly. See Cooley.

No way LA doesn't match.
Agreed. I think there will be more than a handful of LA firms/LA offices of NY-based firms that match. I do think some of the smaller, less prestigious satellites won't match, but I think there certainly will be a large number of followers that move to $190k (i.e., MTO, Gibson, STB, Latham, O'Melveny, Quinn, Kirkland, Skadden, Milbank, Irell, W&C, etc.).
I think there will firms in every market that don't match, but I ain't about that TTT life.

User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:45 pm

rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.
Except no one wants to live in those areas...

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cobretti » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:49 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20. Several prestigious firms are also founded/based in LA: Latham, O'Melveny, MTO, Irell, Gibson Dunn, Quinn Emanuel, etc.

Also, certain areas of LA are more expensive than NY. For instance, Century City (where STB is located) is ridiculously expnsive. Downtown LA is becoming quite pricey too.

Finally, "Silicon Beach" is becoming a thing in Santa Monica, and law firms are adapting accordingly. See Cooley.

No way LA doesn't match
.

User avatar
Byakuya769

New
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Byakuya769 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:52 pm

Think 190k is going to foster some animosity between those at places that match and those at places that don't?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:52 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote: LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.
Except no one wants to live in those areas...
LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.

User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:57 pm

rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote: LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.
Except no one wants to live in those areas...
LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:00 pm

horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:02 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:02 pm

instride91 wrote:Solid reasoning man...
(Says the guy arguing LA is prestigious)

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:03 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Paul, Weiss, for one.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:04 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...
Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:07 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:13 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Paul, Weiss, for one.
I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.
No way. Let's get a CREDITED places to work list going and see just how bad it could be. I'll start:

Cravath, Swaine & Moore

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:15 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Paul, Weiss, for one.
I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.
*goes to P,W*

but re DF's point...most biglaw groups ive experienced either first or second-hand have the peer pressure regardless of whether there's a minimum or not

cuz u kno, it's MOAR PIE PLZ or NOBREAKFAST

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:18 pm

rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...
Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
Latham 1st year here. Latham's NY office has the most attorneys of any of its offices, but the firm is definitely HQ'ed in LA (where it was also founded)

User avatar
instride91

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by instride91 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:20 pm

rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...
Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”