NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by smaug » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:31 pm

TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by UnicornHunter » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:35 pm

smaug wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum
I GOTCHYA SUCKER!!! Obviously NYC is @ 190, and it's just a speed bump on the way to 210. We're about to enter the second great era of Big Law salary increases, say goodbye to the binomial distribution and welcome the trinomial chart. The ELITE FIRMS of the WORLD will dominate their competition by SHATTERING the market!!

User avatar
baal hadad

Gold
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by baal hadad » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:43 pm

TheUnicornHunter wrote:
smaug wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum
I GOTCHYA SUCKER!!! Obviously NYC is @ 190, and it's just a speed bump on the way to 210. We're about to enter the second great era of Big Law salary increases, say goodbye to the binomial distribution and welcome the trinomial chart. The ELITE FIRMS of the WORLD will dominate their competition by SHATTERING the market!!
bimodal...

User avatar
mylifeis24

Bronze
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by mylifeis24 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:07 am

baal hadad wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:
smaug wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum
I GOTCHYA SUCKER!!! Obviously NYC is @ 190, and it's just a speed bump on the way to 210. We're about to enter the second great era of Big Law salary increases, say goodbye to the binomial distribution and welcome the trinomial chart. The ELITE FIRMS of the WORLD will dominate their competition by SHATTERING the market!!
bimodal...
He's in the lower mode obviously.

User avatar
Single-Malt-Liquor

Silver
Posts: 1450
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Single-Malt-Liquor » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:31 pm

While I think that the leak is probably bullshit, I'm confident that the other firms do not know that the leak is bullshit and some are probably clamoring to get the jump on the NYC to 190 train. Kind of like that time you told that girl you liked that you had other options. That worked out too, right?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
almondjoy

Bronze
Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:35 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by almondjoy » Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:53 pm

Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:While I think that the leak is probably bullshit, I'm confident that the other firms do not know that the leak is bullshit and some are probably clamoring to get the jump on the NYC to 190 train. Kind of like that time you told that girl you liked that you had other options. That worked out too, right?
Except in our scenario the girl is secretly meeting with the other girls to verify, DOJ be damned.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:38 pm

is the atl article down?

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:42 pm

baal hadad wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:
smaug wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum
I GOTCHYA SUCKER!!! Obviously NYC is @ 190, and it's just a speed bump on the way to 210. We're about to enter the second great era of Big Law salary increases, say goodbye to the binomial distribution and welcome the trinomial chart. The ELITE FIRMS of the WORLD will dominate their competition by SHATTERING the market!!
bimodal...
a binomial distribution is bimodal by definition

umichman

Bronze
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by umichman » Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:43 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:is the atl article down?
looks that way

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?



User avatar
lymenheimer

Gold
Posts: 3979
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:54 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lymenheimer » Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:50 pm

Nice use of anon

kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by kcdc1 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:02 pm

fats provolone wrote:a binomial distribution is bimodal by definition
Only in the sense that they both start with the same prefix.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:04 pm

kcdc1 wrote:
fats provolone wrote:a binomial distribution is bimodal by definition
Only in the sense that they both start with the same prefix.
form follows function

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Single-Malt-Liquor

Silver
Posts: 1450
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Single-Malt-Liquor » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:04 pm

almondjoy wrote:
Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:While I think that the leak is probably bullshit, I'm confident that the other firms do not know that the leak is bullshit and some are probably clamoring to get the jump on the NYC to 190 train. Kind of like that time you told that girl you liked that you had other options. That worked out too, right?
Except in our scenario the girl is secretly meeting with the other girls to verify, DOJ be damned.
Girls lie though. And we've already got the pics, so you know it happened.

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by SplitMyPants » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:12 pm

fats provolone wrote:
baal hadad wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:
smaug wrote:
TheUnicornHunter wrote:Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
please exit this forum
I GOTCHYA SUCKER!!! Obviously NYC is @ 190, and it's just a speed bump on the way to 210. We're about to enter the second great era of Big Law salary increases, say goodbye to the binomial distribution and welcome the trinomial chart. The ELITE FIRMS of the WORLD will dominate their competition by SHATTERING the market!!
bimodal...
a binomial distribution is bimodal by definition
It only appears that way if you're comparing the distributions for different probabilities of success on the same graph. Do you even maths, bro?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:36 pm

My friend just told me he was talking to his dad, a partner at an uber prestigious V10, about how expensive law school was and how he was worried if it was worth it. His dad sent him this link and whispered NY to 190.

Not flame.

gaddockteeg

Bronze
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by gaddockteeg » Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:33 pm

FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:33 pm

gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
mods pls

User avatar
Actus Reus

Bronze
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Actus Reus » Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:48 pm

gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
This type of hate speech is not allowed in here

gaddockteeg

Bronze
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by gaddockteeg » Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:51 pm

Actus Reus wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
This type of hate speech is not allowed in here
El Pollito wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
mods pls
LOL, sorry; I was just as disappointed when I heard. My friend could be wrong though. shrug.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:04 pm

gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cobretti » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:08 pm

rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
Durham to 190

User avatar
052220152

Gold
Posts: 4798
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 052220152 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:10 pm

gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
Sounds like your friend is getting the boot and they are keeping him in the dark

User avatar
052220152

Gold
Posts: 4798
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 052220152 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:12 pm

Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:
almondjoy wrote:
Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:While I think that the leak is probably bullshit, I'm confident that the other firms do not know that the leak is bullshit and some are probably clamoring to get the jump on the NYC to 190 train. Kind of like that time you told that girl you liked that you had other options. That worked out too, right?
Except in our scenario the girl is secretly meeting with the other girls to verify, DOJ be damned.
Girls lie though. And we've already got the pics, so you know it happened.
Agreed, we got the pics. Little left to dispute imo. Ny to 190 is a foregone conclusion

User avatar
chup

Diamond
Posts: 22942
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by chup » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:26 pm

rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
^ scholarship ^

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”