True, true. Dougherty spouting off about our days of leading the market was not at all well received though, even among the partnership. Around my way (I'm not in NYC), we all kind of knew the bonus thing was coming. The firm was/is killing it, hours were/are up everywhere, and the poaching of associates was/is getting out of hand. They had to do something to keep the troops happy and while last year was nice, I think they know they still have work to do there. The associates committee has been pretty vocal about it and they can only ignore us for so long while raising billing rates every fucking six months.Anonymous User wrote:Yeah, the PowerPoint template is what doesn't make me immediately dismiss this as fake (also STB associate here). Otherwise, I have absolutely nothing of value to add here except that none of the associates I know had any clue of the bonus increase last year until it happened (and we'd actually been told earlier in 2014 not to expect us to be compensation leaders, so most people thought last year if bonuses did go up, STB wouldn't the firm to do it), so this happening out of the blue wouldn't be shocking.Anonymous User wrote:This is almost certainly our powerpoint template, the locations match is dead on, and the New Partners Committee, I can confirm, is meeting all of this week. I'm inclined to think this presentation was made for their benefit as how many partners they mint this year is probably going to take a dip to account for making it rain firmwide. I've been a skeptic of NY to 190, but this has me pretty excited.
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
ATL article no longer online....??
- smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Nice try Lat, you can't pump us for page views that easily.Anonymous User wrote:ATL article no longer online....??
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I mean, yeah, speculation was rampant last year, but no associates *knew* anything. If anything, the pressure seems weaker this year since it's less clear that we'll have another record year this year.Anonymous User wrote:True, true. Dougherty spouting off about our days of leading the market was not at all well received though, even among the partnership. Around my way (I'm not in NYC), we all kind of knew the bonus thing was coming. The firm was/is killing it, hours were/are up everywhere, and the poaching of associates was/is getting out of hand. They had to do something to keep the troops happy and while last year was nice, I think they know they still have work to do there. The associates committee has been pretty vocal about it and they can only ignore us for so long while raising billing rates every fucking six months.Anonymous User wrote:Yeah, the PowerPoint template is what doesn't make me immediately dismiss this as fake (also STB associate here). Otherwise, I have absolutely nothing of value to add here except that none of the associates I know had any clue of the bonus increase last year until it happened (and we'd actually been told earlier in 2014 not to expect us to be compensation leaders, so most people thought last year if bonuses did go up, STB wouldn't the firm to do it), so this happening out of the blue wouldn't be shocking.Anonymous User wrote:This is almost certainly our powerpoint template, the locations match is dead on, and the New Partners Committee, I can confirm, is meeting all of this week. I'm inclined to think this presentation was made for their benefit as how many partners they mint this year is probably going to take a dip to account for making it rain firmwide. I've been a skeptic of NY to 190, but this has me pretty excited.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Well, it's back.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
#'s looking pretty similar at a peer firm. Bombastic growth of last year won't return, but steady growth from last year would still support a higher salary base.Anonymous User wrote:
I mean, yeah, speculation was rampant last year, but no associates *knew* anything. If anything, the pressure seems weaker this year since it's less clear that we'll have another record year this year.
- MCFC

- Posts: 9695
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Nah, it's cool. They invited Covington.qlube wrote: LOL so PW and STB held a secret meeting to discuss associate compensation? Someone oughta inform DOJ, 'cause that's considered price-fixing.
-
charliekelly33

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Above The Law's update:
"UPDATE (10/20/15 9:30 a.m.): Per tipsters, the document pictured above appears to be written in the firm’s signature font and color scheme, but in its after-hours response to our media inquiry, Simpson Thacher said it is “not a Simpson Thacher Firm document.” At present, STB says it has “not made any decisions or announcements regarding 2016 starting salaries for associates.” Don’t lose hope yet, associates — there’s still a chance."
If it was ever in doubt, ATL is now officially the propaganda arm to the NY to 190k movement.
"UPDATE (10/20/15 9:30 a.m.): Per tipsters, the document pictured above appears to be written in the firm’s signature font and color scheme, but in its after-hours response to our media inquiry, Simpson Thacher said it is “not a Simpson Thacher Firm document.” At present, STB says it has “not made any decisions or announcements regarding 2016 starting salaries for associates.” Don’t lose hope yet, associates — there’s still a chance."
If it was ever in doubt, ATL is now officially the propaganda arm to the NY to 190k movement.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
GOOD TROLLcharliekelly33 wrote:Above The Law's update:
"UPDATE (10/20/15 9:30 a.m.): Per tipsters, the document pictured above appears to be written in the firm’s signature font and color scheme, but in its after-hours response to our media inquiry, Simpson Thacher said it is “not a Simpson Thacher Firm document.” At present, STB says it has “not made any decisions or announcements regarding 2016 starting salaries for associates.” Don’t lose hope yet, associates — there’s still a chance."
If it was ever in doubt, ATL is now officially the propaganda arm to the NY to 190k movement.
-
KidStuddi

- Posts: 465
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.
-
charliekelly33

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Dat font, doe
- First Offense

- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Notice what they said - or rather what they didn't say.KidStuddi wrote:The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.
It's not a "firm document". That could just mean that it wasn't a document meant to be disseminated through the firm, and it was more of an "eyes only" document. Or maybe it was a draft of a document that hasn't been finalized yet.
All they had to do to put this rumor to bed was say "we have no intention of raising first year salaries to 190k." They didn't say that, and their silence speaks volumes.
- jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
That was my reaction too. "Not a ST Firm document" sounds like the firm doesn't stand behind it YET and/or it was made by a consulting firm.First Offense wrote:Notice what they said - or rather what they didn't say.KidStuddi wrote:The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.
It's not a "firm document". That could just mean that it wasn't a document meant to be disseminated through the firm, and it was more of an "eyes only" document. Or maybe it was a draft of a document that hasn't been finalized yet.
All they had to do to put this rumor to bed was say "we have no intention of raising first year salaries to 190k." They didn't say that, and their silence speaks volumes.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial
- BizBro

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
They're going to announce before christmas.Brut wrote:if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial
- chicago-gunner123

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:27 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Brut wrote:if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
UPDATE #2 from STB PUBLIC RELATIONS: "We were going to 190, but changed our minds after this leak."
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
to be fair,fats provolone wrote:UPDATE #2 from STB PUBLIC RELATIONS: "We were going to 190, but changed our minds after this leak."
understandable
-
Mamba1991

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
This thread is an incredible example of a grass-roots, community-driven campaign to achieve necessary change. Great work, TLS.
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
huh, this party really died
- smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
lat really knows how to ruin a partyBig Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
passed out riding the dragon, 30,000 dollar bills directly deposited into my blood streamBig Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Yea, I've already adjusted my consumer habits to reflect dat 30k padding
So.. If this whole thing goes to shit, who do I direct bill, Simpson or ATL? The reliance damages are real.
So.. If this whole thing goes to shit, who do I direct bill, Simpson or ATL? The reliance damages are real.
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
i blame the russianssmaug wrote:lat really knows how to ruin a partyBig Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login