NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:This is almost certainly our powerpoint template, the locations match is dead on, and the New Partners Committee, I can confirm, is meeting all of this week. I'm inclined to think this presentation was made for their benefit as how many partners they mint this year is probably going to take a dip to account for making it rain firmwide. I've been a skeptic of NY to 190, but this has me pretty excited.
Yeah, the PowerPoint template is what doesn't make me immediately dismiss this as fake (also STB associate here). Otherwise, I have absolutely nothing of value to add here except that none of the associates I know had any clue of the bonus increase last year until it happened (and we'd actually been told earlier in 2014 not to expect us to be compensation leaders, so most people thought last year if bonuses did go up, STB wouldn't the firm to do it), so this happening out of the blue wouldn't be shocking.
True, true. Dougherty spouting off about our days of leading the market was not at all well received though, even among the partnership. Around my way (I'm not in NYC), we all kind of knew the bonus thing was coming. The firm was/is killing it, hours were/are up everywhere, and the poaching of associates was/is getting out of hand. They had to do something to keep the troops happy and while last year was nice, I think they know they still have work to do there. The associates committee has been pretty vocal about it and they can only ignore us for so long while raising billing rates every fucking six months.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:51 pm

ATL article no longer online....??

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by smaug » Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote:ATL article no longer online....??
Nice try Lat, you can't pump us for page views that easily.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:11 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:This is almost certainly our powerpoint template, the locations match is dead on, and the New Partners Committee, I can confirm, is meeting all of this week. I'm inclined to think this presentation was made for their benefit as how many partners they mint this year is probably going to take a dip to account for making it rain firmwide. I've been a skeptic of NY to 190, but this has me pretty excited.
Yeah, the PowerPoint template is what doesn't make me immediately dismiss this as fake (also STB associate here). Otherwise, I have absolutely nothing of value to add here except that none of the associates I know had any clue of the bonus increase last year until it happened (and we'd actually been told earlier in 2014 not to expect us to be compensation leaders, so most people thought last year if bonuses did go up, STB wouldn't the firm to do it), so this happening out of the blue wouldn't be shocking.
True, true. Dougherty spouting off about our days of leading the market was not at all well received though, even among the partnership. Around my way (I'm not in NYC), we all kind of knew the bonus thing was coming. The firm was/is killing it, hours were/are up everywhere, and the poaching of associates was/is getting out of hand. They had to do something to keep the troops happy and while last year was nice, I think they know they still have work to do there. The associates committee has been pretty vocal about it and they can only ignore us for so long while raising billing rates every fucking six months.
I mean, yeah, speculation was rampant last year, but no associates *knew* anything. If anything, the pressure seems weaker this year since it's less clear that we'll have another record year this year.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:12 am

Well, it's back.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:14 am

Anonymous User wrote:
I mean, yeah, speculation was rampant last year, but no associates *knew* anything. If anything, the pressure seems weaker this year since it's less clear that we'll have another record year this year.
#'s looking pretty similar at a peer firm. Bombastic growth of last year won't return, but steady growth from last year would still support a higher salary base.

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by MCFC » Tue Oct 20, 2015 6:20 am

qlube wrote: LOL so PW and STB held a secret meeting to discuss associate compensation? Someone oughta inform DOJ, 'cause that's considered price-fixing.
Nah, it's cool. They invited Covington.

charliekelly33

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by charliekelly33 » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:38 am

Above The Law's update:

"UPDATE (10/20/15 9:30 a.m.): Per tipsters, the document pictured above appears to be written in the firm’s signature font and color scheme, but in its after-hours response to our media inquiry, Simpson Thacher said it is “not a Simpson Thacher Firm document.” At present, STB says it has “not made any decisions or announcements regarding 2016 starting salaries for associates.” Don’t lose hope yet, associates — there’s still a chance."

If it was ever in doubt, ATL is now officially the propaganda arm to the NY to 190k movement.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:47 am

charliekelly33 wrote:Above The Law's update:

"UPDATE (10/20/15 9:30 a.m.): Per tipsters, the document pictured above appears to be written in the firm’s signature font and color scheme, but in its after-hours response to our media inquiry, Simpson Thacher said it is “not a Simpson Thacher Firm document.” At present, STB says it has “not made any decisions or announcements regarding 2016 starting salaries for associates.” Don’t lose hope yet, associates — there’s still a chance."

If it was ever in doubt, ATL is now officially the propaganda arm to the NY to 190k movement.
GOOD TROLL

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


KidStuddi

Bronze
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by KidStuddi » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:48 am

The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.

charliekelly33

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by charliekelly33 » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:50 am

Dat font, doe

User avatar
First Offense

Platinum
Posts: 7091
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by First Offense » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:51 am

KidStuddi wrote:The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.
Notice what they said - or rather what they didn't say.

It's not a "firm document". That could just mean that it wasn't a document meant to be disseminated through the firm, and it was more of an "eyes only" document. Or maybe it was a draft of a document that hasn't been finalized yet.

All they had to do to put this rumor to bed was say "we have no intention of raising first year salaries to 190k." They didn't say that, and their silence speaks volumes.

User avatar
jkpolk

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by jkpolk » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:15 am

First Offense wrote:
KidStuddi wrote:The "haven't made any decisions regarding 2016 starting salaries," is one thing and was expected, they were never going to announce that via ATL, but how can they deny that map, the color scheme, and the font aren't clearly STB? Oh well.
Notice what they said - or rather what they didn't say.

It's not a "firm document". That could just mean that it wasn't a document meant to be disseminated through the firm, and it was more of an "eyes only" document. Or maybe it was a draft of a document that hasn't been finalized yet.

All they had to do to put this rumor to bed was say "we have no intention of raising first year salaries to 190k." They didn't say that, and their silence speaks volumes.
That was my reaction too. "Not a ST Firm document" sounds like the firm doesn't stand behind it YET and/or it was made by a consulting firm.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 03152016 » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:17 am

if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial

User avatar
BizBro

Silver
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BizBro » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:26 am

Brut wrote:if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial
They're going to announce before christmas.

User avatar
chicago-gunner123

New
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:27 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by chicago-gunner123 » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:26 am

Brut wrote:if there were any remaining doubts about ny to 190 before, they've been obliterated by simpson's carefully crafted non-denial

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Tue Oct 20, 2015 7:22 pm

UPDATE #2 from STB PUBLIC RELATIONS: "We were going to 190, but changed our minds after this leak."

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Tue Oct 20, 2015 7:50 pm

fats provolone wrote:UPDATE #2 from STB PUBLIC RELATIONS: "We were going to 190, but changed our minds after this leak."
to be fair,

understandable

Mamba1991

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Mamba1991 » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:33 pm

This thread is an incredible example of a grass-roots, community-driven campaign to achieve necessary change. Great work, TLS.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:20 pm

huh, this party really died

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by smaug » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:22 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
lat really knows how to ruin a party

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
jkpolk

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by jkpolk » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:41 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
passed out riding the dragon, 30,000 dollar bills directly deposited into my blood stream

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by jbagelboy » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:49 pm

Yea, I've already adjusted my consumer habits to reflect dat 30k padding

So.. If this whole thing goes to shit, who do I direct bill, Simpson or ATL? The reliance damages are real.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:14 pm

smaug wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:huh, this party really died
lat really knows how to ruin a party
i blame the russians

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by UnicornHunter » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:26 pm

Dropping the schtick for a second, I'm not even sure if I WANT firms to go to 190. Current system of paying out big ass bonuses in good years seems pretty ideal, as it gives firms a lot more flexibility to not fire people on bad years.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”