NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:09 pm

jkpolk wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:I'm unironically on teh 190k HYPERLOOP

STB has to deny now, and if they dont' THEY CONFIRM
The fact that it's been at least 2 hours since Simpson heard from ATL about this makes me think some kind of meeting is going on. Otherwise a one-line "that's total bullshit" would have already been sent.
this is basically our cuban missile crisis

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:11 pm

Don't want to stoke the speculation, but I'm hearing a different V10 is planning to announce a pay raise tomorrow. Stay tuned!!!

User avatar
wert3813

Silver
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by wert3813 » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:15 pm

We need op it change the title. Give Simpson the pr they want from the move.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:19 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to stoke the speculation
No, no, we wouldn't want that

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:31 pm

lolz this is great

also, if they opened DC office in 2005, why does data on graph for DC start at ~2000?

2 SPOOKY 4 U

Image

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:39 pm

Traynor Brah wrote:
thesealocust wrote:History is written by the winners.

User avatar
ForgotMyPassword

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:18 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by ForgotMyPassword » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:46 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:alright, which one of you assholes is responsible for this?
assholes? even if fake, it only increases the 190k movement popularity. Even if pure flame, this was a coup.
This may be the most successful TLS flame of all time.
rpupkin wrote:This thread has featured months of insights, tips, and leaks. ATL's response? Deafening silence.

But then one poster trolls on Reddit, and ATL runs with it.

Fuck you, Above The Law. This isn't over.
This just shows how lazy ATL editors are, they prefer an imgur link to the joy of reading through a mere 36 pages of incisive commentary.

makerbreaker

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by makerbreaker » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:53 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:lolz this is great

also, if they opened DC office in 2005, why does data on graph for DC start at ~2000?

2 SPOOKY 4 U
More proof of how lazy ATL editors are.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:54 pm

this is incredible

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
5ky

Diamond
Posts: 10835
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 5ky » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:07 pm

makerbreaker wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:lolz this is great

also, if they opened DC office in 2005, why does data on graph for DC start at ~2000?

2 SPOOKY 4 U
More proof of how lazy ATL editors are.
counterpoint: boomer Admin. Assistant/secretary forgot DC office was new, didn't check.

nyto190

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:10 pm

yeh, poss

i want 2 believe, but i dont think i can

Image

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:16 pm

rpupkin wrote:This thread has featured months of insights, tips, and leaks. ATL's response? Deafening silence.

But then one poster trolls on Reddit, and ATL runs with it.

Fuck you, Above The Law. This isn't over.
The most sickening thing to me is this anon COWARD decided to break the ATL story story in its own thread rather than report it right here where all the hard work has been done for months on end
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=255416

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:41 pm

wert3813 wrote:We need op it change the title. Give Simpson the pr they want from the move.
OP do NOT change subject line. P, W is still going to be first mover. The STB packet that shows the salary graphs on p. 28 is the latter part of a comps analysis. It is PURELY hypothetical. The earlier pages show the effect on RPL and PPP based on different scenarios of associate base salaries (and also includes scenarios for bonus growth, unchanged, or reductions).

The entire packet was distributed at a compensation committee meeting and was INFORMATIONAL only based on the behind-closed-doors meetings (led by P, W).
Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to stoke the speculation, but I'm hearing a different V10 is planning to announce a pay raise tomorrow. Stay tuned!!!
P, W is not V10. Although after they announce tomorrow, Vault may give them an honorary bump for 2016.

Source: My bro was at the behind-closed-doors meeting which included STB (initials JdM)

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:47 pm

luv dis flame doe

qlube

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:08 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by qlube » Mon Oct 19, 2015 9:59 pm

anonnymouse wrote:
wert3813 wrote:We need op it change the title. Give Simpson the pr they want from the move.
OP do NOT change subject line. P, W is still going to be first mover. The STB packet that shows the salary graphs on p. 28 is the latter part of a comps analysis. It is PURELY hypothetical. The earlier pages show the effect on RPL and PPP based on different scenarios of associate base salaries (and also includes scenarios for bonus growth, unchanged, or reductions).

The entire packet was distributed at a compensation committee meeting and was INFORMATIONAL only based on the behind-closed-doors meetings (led by P, W).
Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to stoke the speculation, but I'm hearing a different V10 is planning to announce a pay raise tomorrow. Stay tuned!!!
P, W is not V10. Although after they announce tomorrow, Vault may give them an honorary bump for 2016.

Source: My bro was at the behind-closed-doors meeting which included STB (initials JdM)
LOL so PW and STB held a secret meeting to discuss associate compensation? Someone oughta inform DOJ, 'cause that's considered price-fixing.

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Danger Zone » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:06 pm

Holy shit what has this thread done
Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:09 pm

wage fixing

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:15 pm

qlube wrote:
anonnymouse wrote:
wert3813 wrote:We need op it change the title. Give Simpson the pr they want from the move.
OP do NOT change subject line. P, W is still going to be first mover. The STB packet that shows the salary graphs on p. 28 is the latter part of a comps analysis. It is PURELY hypothetical. The earlier pages show the effect on RPL and PPP based on different scenarios of associate base salaries (and also includes scenarios for bonus growth, unchanged, or reductions).

The entire packet was distributed at a compensation committee meeting and was INFORMATIONAL only based on the behind-closed-doors meetings (led by P, W).
Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to stoke the speculation, but I'm hearing a different V10 is planning to announce a pay raise tomorrow. Stay tuned!!!
P, W is not V10. Although after they announce tomorrow, Vault may give them an honorary bump for 2016.

Source: My bro was at the behind-closed-doors meeting which included STB (initials JdM)
LOL so PW and STB held a secret meeting to discuss associate compensation? Someone oughta inform DOJ, 'cause that's considered price-fixing.
No one said anything about Pillsbury.

barkschool

Silver
Posts: 1024
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:05 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by barkschool » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:33 pm

How fast did the last jump in NYC spread to other major markets?

User avatar
cron1834

Gold
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by cron1834 » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:35 pm

wert3813 wrote:We need op it change the title. Give Simpson the pr they want from the move.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:39 pm

barkschool wrote:How fast did the last jump in NYC spread to other major markets?
Along the same lines, how long did it take to spread to less preftigious firms? For instance, the NY firm I will be starting at has 200+ attorneys and pays 160K, but is not Vault ranked.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
BizBro

Silver
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BizBro » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:42 pm

Yea we wanna know if V50s will be matching, and how soon.

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:49 pm

BizBro wrote:Yea we wanna know if V50s will be matching, and how soon.
V10 plus a few select other firms (P, W) are confirmed moving to 190 scale. The rest of the V20 through V42 will be moving to 175 to try to remain relevant. Beyond that, almost all other V100 firms will remain at 160 scale but may try to give "true-up" bonuses each year, depending on PPP.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:51 pm

anonnymouse wrote:
BizBro wrote:Yea we wanna know if V50s will be matching, and how soon.
V10 plus a few select other firms (P, W) are confirmed moving to 190 scale. The rest of the V20 through V42 will be moving to 175 to try to remain relevant. Beyond that, almost all other V100 firms will remain at 160 scale but may try to give "true-up" bonuses each year, depending on PPP.
first plausible poast ITT

KidStuddi

Bronze
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by KidStuddi » Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:53 pm

makerbreaker wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:lolz this is great

also, if they opened DC office in 2005, why does data on graph for DC start at ~2000?

2 SPOOKY 4 U
More proof of how lazy ATL editors are.
Simpson actually had a D.C. office prior to its current iteration.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”