Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:21 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:10 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:38 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:23 pm
Lmfao that CWT rant has big "Yale and Columbia" energy
"The one yalie who somehow strikes out only to end up at CWT"
Can we go after white & case next? Every firm has its turn on TLS. I'm tired of going after K&E and CWT. Let's talk about how the biggest chads and lowest IQs end up at white & case. :P :twisted: :wink:
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:13 pm
I'm tired of the same punching bags over and over again. Can we pick on some random firm that never gets much attention on here?
I nominate Sidley Austin. Can't speak for every office but I've had to rely on transactional attorneys in the NY office of Sidley Austin. My god. The incompetence.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:01 pm
My first virtual law firm event was in spring and CWT sent 6 associates. By OCI, all 6 of those associates were gone.


They were not of fitting constitution to handle the Rigors of Cadwalader.

Image

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm

The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:21 pm
I nominate Sidley Austin. Can't speak for every office but I've had to rely on transactional attorneys in the NY office of Sidley Austin. My god. The incompetence.
According to a friend at NW, Sidley Austin took this guy. Not that you can't tell from his profile but his GPA was not above median.

https://www.tiktok.com/@jawnathanroger

:lol:

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:29 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
I'm dying. The claws are out tonight but I'm having fun.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:35 pm

There's a reason my 1.5 years at a V10 law firm stays at the top of the resume even after I've lateraled twice. CWT? Sidley? hah

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:43 pm

Any law student nervous for their upcoming biglaw interview should just read this thread. The image of the intimidating lawyer in a sophisticated profession will go out the window pretty quickly.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:44 pm

Anyone know the number of firms that pay the full scale, including all bonuses? Maybe 150 firms?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:43 pm
Any law student nervous for their upcoming biglaw interview should just read this thread. The image of the intimidating lawyer in a sophisticated profession will go out the window pretty quickly.
As a third year associate at a very prestigious firm, I just want to say that you ain't wrong

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:45 pm

Akin Gump sounds like a disease from the 1700s. Allen & Overy is the manufacturer of the "medicine" used to treat it (ingredients: alcohol, opium, cocaine, urine).

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:01 pm
My first virtual law firm event was in spring and CWT sent 6 associates. By OCI, all 6 of those associates were gone.


They were not of fitting constitution to handle the Rigors of Cadwalader.

Image
:lol: not sure if I'm laughing with you or at you at this point

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:00 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s
Foley & Lardner takes the OCI strikeouts at my t14.

stickershocked

New
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by stickershocked » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:14 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:00 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s
Foley & Lardner takes the OCI strikeouts at my t14.
Who?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:25 pm

Is it true that Mayer Brown doesn't advance you to the next class year if you don't make your hours? If so, they should be the punching bag in every thread for all time.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s
Latham always seems to have way too many random associates on every call, like how many fucking NoteTakers do you need

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:35 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:13 pm
I'm tired of the same punching bags over and over again. Can we pick on some random firm that never gets much attention on here?
Cadwalader defender anon above. What if someone in CWT recruiting has taken the position that "no publicity is bad publicity" and stokes these flame wars? Part of me thinks it's pretty baller how much we punch above our weight on here in terms of mentions.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:41 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:49 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:34 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:28 pm
Lol, you’re telling us that all of the boies Schiller associates who lateraled to cadwalader are now worse off? You’re saying that a 60 year old judge won’t hire them from New York’s oldest law firm because their vault ranking is too low? You’re saying their Morgan Stanley is fine hiring them and working with them as outside counsel but won’t take them in house? You’re saying that the rainmakers at cwt are putting their client relationships at stake by not training their associates and hiring morons? In my year at my t14 I knew enough people who struck out at OCI to fill half of cadwalader’s summer class—people are just upset that we have down to earth partners who know that there is more to ability to succeed in the law beyond where you went to school.

Uhh, have you looked at the bios of the Boies Schiller attorneys who lateralled to Cadwalader? Take a gander and you'll see something pretty noticeable.
Don't know if I'm just thick but I'm not following this. Any hints?
I figured they were trying to say that the attorneys were somehow deficient or went to shitty schools. First person I came across went to Cornell Law and worked at Lehman and as a managing director at Goldman. Is this what you meant?
Yeah I meant the associates, not partners. Gravante and the rest of his (partner) team are as legit as they come. The associates? Well, it's BSF, what do you expect at this point...

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:46 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s
People at t14's get 2.x GPA's? Isn't that, like, illegal?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:46 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:33 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:25 pm
The dumbest biglaw attorneys I've ever worked with, by a mile, all came from Troutman.
Let's stick to actual biglaw hmm
Allen & Overy
They only take from the bottom of the barrel
I nominate Akin Gump
Baker McKenzie routinely takes 2.x GPAs out of lower T-14s
People at t14's get 2.x GPA's? Isn't that, like, illegal?
You have to really try. At my lower T-14, anything below a flat B was pretty much punitive.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:41 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:49 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:34 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:28 pm
Lol, you’re telling us that all of the boies Schiller associates who lateraled to cadwalader are now worse off? You’re saying that a 60 year old judge won’t hire them from New York’s oldest law firm because their vault ranking is too low? You’re saying their Morgan Stanley is fine hiring them and working with them as outside counsel but won’t take them in house? You’re saying that the rainmakers at cwt are putting their client relationships at stake by not training their associates and hiring morons? In my year at my t14 I knew enough people who struck out at OCI to fill half of cadwalader’s summer class—people are just upset that we have down to earth partners who know that there is more to ability to succeed in the law beyond where you went to school.

Uhh, have you looked at the bios of the Boies Schiller attorneys who lateralled to Cadwalader? Take a gander and you'll see something pretty noticeable.
Don't know if I'm just thick but I'm not following this. Any hints?
I figured they were trying to say that the attorneys were somehow deficient or went to shitty schools. First person I came across went to Cornell Law and worked at Lehman and as a managing director at Goldman. Is this what you meant?
Yeah I meant the associates, not partners. Gravante and the rest of his (partner) team are as legit as they come. The associates? Well, it's BSF, what do you expect at this point...
So, uh, what's wrong with the associates?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432631
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:13 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:06 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:41 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:49 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:34 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:28 pm
Lol, you’re telling us that all of the boies Schiller associates who lateraled to cadwalader are now worse off? You’re saying that a 60 year old judge won’t hire them from New York’s oldest law firm because their vault ranking is too low? You’re saying their Morgan Stanley is fine hiring them and working with them as outside counsel but won’t take them in house? You’re saying that the rainmakers at cwt are putting their client relationships at stake by not training their associates and hiring morons? In my year at my t14 I knew enough people who struck out at OCI to fill half of cadwalader’s summer class—people are just upset that we have down to earth partners who know that there is more to ability to succeed in the law beyond where you went to school.

Uhh, have you looked at the bios of the Boies Schiller attorneys who lateralled to Cadwalader? Take a gander and you'll see something pretty noticeable.
Don't know if I'm just thick but I'm not following this. Any hints?
I figured they were trying to say that the attorneys were somehow deficient or went to shitty schools. First person I came across went to Cornell Law and worked at Lehman and as a managing director at Goldman. Is this what you meant?
Yeah I meant the associates, not partners. Gravante and the rest of his (partner) team are as legit as they come. The associates? Well, it's BSF, what do you expect at this point...
So, uh, what's wrong with the associates?
Nothing, I assume this guys is talking about people that came with Sean O'Shea from his lit boutique to BSF and then left to Cadwalader. Not sure what they're talking about with regard to the associates because BSF used to be elite, so almost all the associates that left recently were highly qualified. Either way, it's a dumb argument because no matter how much Cadwalader sucks, it exists and BSF might not in a year lmao

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”