Oh, but that argument makes no sense. 2022 hasn't happened yet. We got announced our special bonuses in March 2021. We could be getting special bonuses again in March 2022. I'm not saying I will, but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say we're getting paid less this year than last year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:21 pmNo, it’s 2021 comp vs. 2022 comp. In the absence of special bonuses for 2022, comp is remaining practically flat for 2022. Same anon as above who is being informed that firms only care about the perception, not the effect. But the effect is I’m going to be looking at lateral options to make up the difference.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:58 amHey - can someone explain to me why people keep saying we're making less this year than last year?
In 2020, a 1st year made 190k base + 15k EOY bonus + $7.5k COVID bonus = $212,500
In 2021, a 1st year made 205k* base + $20k EOY bonus + $12k retention bonus = $237,000
*I understand the base salary was only raised half way through the year, so it's really more like $197.5K base, but still more than 2020.
I'm not trying to flame - I'm just trying to understand how people are calculating us making less money. For reference, I'm going off the numbers here which also adjusts for inflation: https://www.biglawinvestor.com/biglaw-salary-scale/
FWIW, I'm with everyone else that this bonus increase does not justify the insane increase in hours we saw this year, and we absolutely should be getting paid more than we currently are. But can we actually stay factually accurate?