
Fall bonuses Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 8:52 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I am just praying that after CSM announces 2019 cravath scale + fall bonus for 2020 EOY, DPW or some other fall bonus firm announces that as their EOY bonus as well. 

-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:51 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Obviously then Cravath matches DPW again, and then DPW matches Cravath again, and eventually associates are walking away with more than partners. There's no way this doesn't happen, right?
- cornerstone
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:08 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
No, anoning this is the ultimate troll move.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Kirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- daedalus2309
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:15 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Staff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
- parkslope
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I don't think it's a bonus thing. Sullcrom laid people off and still paid the bonuses. I think the staff layoffs are just due to offices being closed, so a lot of in-person stuff like document production isn't needed. But I'm not sure what will happen when firms reopen offices sometime next year. Someone will need to run the copy machines then.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I think it’s firm realizing they no longer need the large number of staff that they needed 15+ years ago. Pandemic likely accelerated the trend, but has been in the works (at least at my firm) over last few years. Not to be too cynical, but I don’t think these jobs will come back post-pandemic.parkslope wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:14 pmI don't think it's a bonus thing. Sullcrom laid people off and still paid the bonuses. I think the staff layoffs are just due to offices being closed, so a lot of in-person stuff like document production isn't needed. But I'm not sure what will happen when firms reopen offices sometime next year. Someone will need to run the copy machines then.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Some firms were giving staff little bonuses in order to give them a little something during this crappy year. KE is giving no fall bonuses and is firing staff.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
Even if other firms were just as bad, and even if KE trues us up at the end of the year, it still feels like a shitty place right now. The firm can't be lacking in money. I'm not sure how slow corporate etc. is but litigation is just as busy as normal and I'm sure the BK group is doing immense hours.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I don't think that firing staff is an indicator of anything. Stealth firing staff en masse like Kirkland is doing right now is just cruel. Can confirm that the firm is as busy as ever, my peers and I were billing 250+ hours every month during this summer and there's no signs of this slowing down. Not getting fall bonuses were a slap in the face.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:29 pmSome firms were giving staff little bonuses in order to give them a little something during this crappy year. KE is giving no fall bonuses and is firing staff. Even if other firms were just as bad, and even if KE trues us up at the end of the year, it still feels like a shitty place right now. The firm can't be lacking in money. I'm not sure how slow corporate etc. is but litigation is just as busy as normal and I'm sure the BK group is doing immense hours.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Agree - it is obviously not a sign of finances. But sends a signal that KE is ready to ruthlessly cut its bottom line. I know from talking to a lot of people that KE needs to knock bonuses out of the park this year in order for a bunch of us not to leave after the new year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:18 pmI don't think that firing staff is an indicator of anything. Stealth firing staff en masse like Kirkland is doing right now is just cruel. Can confirm that the firm is as busy as ever, my peers and I were billing 250+ hours every month during this summer and there's no signs of this slowing down. Not getting fall bonuses were a slap in the face.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:29 pmSome firms were giving staff little bonuses in order to give them a little something during this crappy year. KE is giving no fall bonuses and is firing staff. Even if other firms were just as bad, and even if KE trues us up at the end of the year, it still feels like a shitty place right now. The firm can't be lacking in money. I'm not sure how slow corporate etc. is but litigation is just as busy as normal and I'm sure the BK group is doing immense hours.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Agree - it is obviously not a sign of finances. But sends a signal that KE is ready to ruthlessly cut its bottom line. I know from talking to a lot of people that KE needs to knock bonuses out of the park this year in order for a bunch of us not to leave after the new year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:18 pmI don't think that firing staff is an indicator of anything. Stealth firing staff en masse like Kirkland is doing right now is just cruel. Can confirm that the firm is as busy as ever, my peers and I were billing 250+ hours every month during this summer and there's no signs of this slowing down. Not getting fall bonuses were a slap in the face.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:29 pmSome firms were giving staff little bonuses in order to give them a little something during this crappy year. KE is giving no fall bonuses and is firing staff. Even if other firms were just as bad, and even if KE trues us up at the end of the year, it still feels like a shitty place right now. The firm can't be lacking in money. I'm not sure how slow corporate etc. is but litigation is just as busy as normal and I'm sure the BK group is doing immense hours.daedalus2309 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:42 pmStaff layoffs seem to be an industry thing. Skadden and I believe Sullcrom (maybe others) laid off staff this year. My guess: significant chance this is part of general BigLaw shittiness but doesn’t necessarily reflect bonus intentions (although I do take your point about optics playing a role).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:36 pmKirkland is laying off a bunch of staff. Morale is very, very low. We know the firm is doing quite well so there's really only two reasons for what's going on: (1) the firm realized giving fall bonuses and then firing a bunch of non-lawyers would be insensitive, so they pushed the bonuses to year end; (2) the firm has become even more ruthlessly efficient at maximizing PPP and believes it need not pay fall bonuses to retain the kinds of associates that it needs (and staff layoffs fit with this, too). If the reality turns out to be (2), there will be a mass associate exodus in Q1 2021 - I have no doubt about this based on the conversations I'm hearing.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
No one is leaving K&E because of staff layoffs. It is unfortunate that they have occurred but not surprising given the lack of in-person work.
If they don't pay fall bonuses and people are as busy as they have been, then yes people might leave.
If they don't pay fall bonuses and people are as busy as they have been, then yes people might leave.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:51 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I think we should all stay replying to the dozens of recruiter emails advertising firms that pay "Cravath scale" that we're only interested in market paying firms.
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Grade A. Maybe bcc csmrecruit@cravath.com on the email, though, to make sure the message hits the target.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Latham bonus is out.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Latham just matched DPW.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Latham coming around to dutifully remind fresh graduates and laterals that CravaTTTh, KirklandTTT and SkaTTTen are all overraTTTed.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:57 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Matched on the fall bonus or matched as in announced year end bonus + DPW fall bonus? It seems really close to year end to match fall bonus at this point.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Will pay Nov 30 based on annualized hours to date.Usernameavailable wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:12 pmMatched on the fall bonus or matched as in announced year end bonus + DPW fall bonus? It seems really close to year end to match fall bonus at this point.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Fall bonus paid November 30Usernameavailable wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:12 pmMatched on the fall bonus or matched as in announced year end bonus + DPW fall bonus? It seems really close to year end to match fall bonus at this point.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Latham bonus announcement also described a new firm wide “giving thanks” initiative whereby the firm will make an initial $1,000,000 donation to communities in need and match up to an additional $1,000,000 in donations made by firm personnel and retired partners to anti-hunger charities.
A lot of socially-conscious associates are proud to be working at LW today.
A lot of socially-conscious associates are proud to be working at LW today.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
How’d other firms pay out to associates under pace? Been a rougher year for me hours-wise but just starting to get busy again and hoping it’s prorated instead of 0
- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Wow, that makes Kirkland look terrible.NoLongerALurker wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:56 amLatham coming around to dutifully remind fresh graduates and laterals that CravaTTTh, KirklandTTT and SkaTTTen are all overraTTTed.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Well this also makes PW look really bad, given how PW said it couldn't issue the fall bonus because it would look unethical to do so in a pandemic. Latham's approach seems to be the solution to that "optics" issue while taking care of its own -- give the fall bonus and THEN top it off with a large donation to a charity.... you know.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:30 pmLatham bonus announcement also described a new firm wide “giving thanks” initiative whereby the firm will make an initial $1,000,000 donation to communities in need and match up to an additional $1,000,000 in donations made by firm personnel and retired partners to anti-hunger charities.
A lot of socially-conscious associates are proud to be working at LW today.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login