I'm glad I dont have to worry about this. My Ex-GF used to get pissed off because people would compliment my hair so much, especially after she'd pay $300 to get her hair donezettsscores40 wrote:One thing I haven't seen discussed is hairstyles. I think we've covered facial hair.
OCI/callbacks/etc Men's Clothing Mega-thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- GodSpeed

- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yeah I got blessed with good hair genes (thanks dadGodSpeed wrote:I'm glad I dont have to worry about this. My Ex-GF used to get pissed off because people would compliment my hair so much, especially after she'd pay $300 to get her hair donezettsscores40 wrote:One thing I haven't seen discussed is hairstyles. I think we've covered facial hair.Cougars have pulled on it, told me they love it and whispered very dirty things in my ear outside the presence of their sig-others and gay guys have complimented me on it. Awesome hair FTMFW.
- GodSpeed

- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Side part, ftw.zettsscores40 wrote:Yeah I got blessed with good hair genes (thanks dadGodSpeed wrote:I'm glad I dont have to worry about this. My Ex-GF used to get pissed off because people would compliment my hair so much, especially after she'd pay $300 to get her hair donezettsscores40 wrote:One thing I haven't seen discussed is hairstyles. I think we've covered facial hair.Cougars have pulled on it, told me they love it and whispered very dirty things in my ear outside the presence of their sig-others and gay guys have complimented me on it. Awesome hair FTMFW.
) but the problem is I get bored of it too easily and I like to change it up (nothing too radical--just shorter to longer, parting it in different spots, slicking back, etc). I guess I was trying to figure out/gauge if there are any no-nos for an interview/the office. Obviously the Pauly D is out.
I'm a rebel; I part it on the right *gasp*
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I mean you should be fine. It's become pretty common. No one is going to point you out for it.romothesavior wrote:Going to watch a trial for my internship. (I'm a 0L interning in HR at a Fortune 100 company this summer, and an attorney invited me to come watch a trial.)zettsscores40 wrote:What's the event?romothesavior wrote:Well, I'm wearing a button-down with a suit tomorrow, mostly because I have no other shirts to wear (most of my wardrobe has been moved to STL). Is it ideal or trendy? According to GQ, no. But a hell of a lot of people do it, and the button down has been worn with suits (yes suits, not just sports jackets) periodically throughout the past century, so I certainly won't be looking or feeling awkward in it.
- romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yeah, and this company is extremely laid back in terms of dres. When I went to talk to to this attorney in his office last week, he was wearing a short sleeve mock-turtleneck and slacks (the guy is kinda jacked for a 40-something, so he pulls it off). No one will notice or care.zettsscores40 wrote:I mean you should be fine. It's become pretty common. No one is going to point you out for it.romothesavior wrote:
Going to watch a trial for my internship. (I'm a 0L interning in HR at a Fortune 100 company this summer, and an attorney invited me to come watch a trial.)
Also, how fashionable is the thin, balding hairstyle? That's what I'm rockin, and will be rockin' for some time to come.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yeah I did that recently for a wedding except it was a shorter style. I have to gel it/moose it a bit (which I hate) b/c I haven't worn it like that in a while and it's not "trained" well enough to stay without some product. I've parted to the right but I have a problem with a cowlick on the leftside of my hair that makes it weird--it's easier to deal with on the left.GodSpeed wrote:Side part, ftw.zettsscores40 wrote:Yeah I got blessed with good hair genes (thanks dadGodSpeed wrote:I'm glad I dont have to worry about this. My Ex-GF used to get pissed off because people would compliment my hair so much, especially after she'd pay $300 to get her hair donezettsscores40 wrote:One thing I haven't seen discussed is hairstyles. I think we've covered facial hair.Cougars have pulled on it, told me they love it and whispered very dirty things in my ear outside the presence of their sig-others and gay guys have complimented me on it. Awesome hair FTMFW.
) but the problem is I get bored of it too easily and I like to change it up (nothing too radical--just shorter to longer, parting it in different spots, slicking back, etc). I guess I was trying to figure out/gauge if there are any no-nos for an interview/the office. Obviously the Pauly D is out.
I'm a rebel; I part it on the right *gasp*
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Depends on the dude and facial feature/structure really. I already said if I bald at an early age (knock on wood) I'm going Mr. Clean style.romothesavior wrote:Yeah, and this company is extremely laid back in terms of dres. When I went to talk to to this attorney in his office last week, he was wearing a short sleeve mock-turtleneck and slacks (the guy is kinda jacked for a 40-something, so he pulls it off). No one will notice or care.zettsscores40 wrote:I mean you should be fine. It's become pretty common. No one is going to point you out for it.romothesavior wrote:
Going to watch a trial for my internship. (I'm a 0L interning in HR at a Fortune 100 company this summer, and an attorney invited me to come watch a trial.)
Also, how fashionable is the thin, balding hairstyle? That's what I'm rockin, and will be rockin' for some time to come.
- BunkMoreland

- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:16 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
GodSpeed wrote:At first I was like "no way" but you MIGHT be able to pull it off. I'd say no though. Honestly, it's not going to win you any points for doing it and you stand to lose a lot if someone doesn't like it.Waterman47 wrote:Just know that it would set you apart from everyone else. If you're comfortable with that, go for it.BunkMoreland wrote:Opinions: on interviews, whether or not a small white linen pocket square in TV fold would be appropriate
I personally wouldn't do it because it might look like you're trying too hard. The rest of the ensemble better be impeccable, IMO.
Actually, that's a good rule of thumb for interviews. Everything deviating from the traditional uniform(Navy/dark charcoal, solid suit, red power tie, white shirt, black shoes, black belt), at best, will do nothing for you and at worst will cost you the job.
Conservative doesn't mean bland or boring or even not good. I dress extremely conservatively and I frequently get compliments. In fact, I think it's EASIER to look good being conservative than it is trying to be GQ at a charity ball or something. It's done well so rarely, especially by the under 30 crowd, that a 25yr old with a solid navy suit, black LEATHER SOLED shoes, black belt and strong red tie actually stands out.
I kind of was leaning towards this anyway, thanks guys. I always wear pocket squares (before we get into it, yes I only use either white linen TV fold or a tasteful puff fold that isn't just the same pattern/cut of the tie that they sell to black doods) but ITE I'm not taking any chances
- vamedic03

- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
See, here's the problem with this thread... there's just a lot of poorly formed opinions that people toss around like hard set rules...Renzo wrote:One of which happens to be button-downs with suits make people look like circus clowns.vamedic03 wrote: Wow, you seem to harbor some anger towards button down collars with suits... chill out and recognize that men's business wear has very few hard rules...
- HJO

- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:04 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'm wearing brown shoes and belt with a navy suit for my interviews. These specifically...


- missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I know what 'Business Attire" for men means, but got ladies does it mean the same thing or could you get away with a shift dress?

--ImageRemoved--

--ImageRemoved--
- GodSpeed

- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Well, if you insist.HJO wrote:I'm wearing brown shoes and belt with a navy suit for my interviews. These specifically...
- Waterman47

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'd wear brown, but a much darker brown than that. I think that shade of brown is a bit casual. And I hate that toe-cap style. Looks like something an old man would wear.
Pair of brown shoes I would wear to an interview:
http://www.bluefly.com/Ferragamo-hickor ... detail.fly
This is an expensive example, but there are many cheaper versions around. Notice that the sole and the top are the same color. This is much, much better than the black sole/brown shoe look.
I think, generally, if you're going to break from the mold in interviews/office settings, you've got to do it well. IMO wearing the light brown pair will make you look clueless, if the person conducting the interview is at all fashion conscious. But if you wear something like the Ferragamo pair, you could stand out for your chicness.
Pair of brown shoes I would wear to an interview:
http://www.bluefly.com/Ferragamo-hickor ... detail.fly
This is an expensive example, but there are many cheaper versions around. Notice that the sole and the top are the same color. This is much, much better than the black sole/brown shoe look.
I think, generally, if you're going to break from the mold in interviews/office settings, you've got to do it well. IMO wearing the light brown pair will make you look clueless, if the person conducting the interview is at all fashion conscious. But if you wear something like the Ferragamo pair, you could stand out for your chicness.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Black for interviews is generally safer. Maybe my eyes are still a bit woozy but the ones Waterman posted look a little weird to me.
- vamedic03

- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Brown shoes + brown belt are perfectly acceptable for wearing with a navy suit.
- Mr. Fancy

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:22 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Dark brown is perfectly acceptable. Medium brown with black soles is not.vamedic03 wrote:Brown shoes + brown belt are perfectly acceptable for wearing with a navy suit.
- zettsscores40

- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
No one disputes that but black is generally safer for interviews b/c as mentioned you can completely fuck up the color/matching with belt. Err on the side of caution.vamedic03 wrote:Brown shoes + brown belt are perfectly acceptable for wearing with a navy suit.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
keg411

- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Pair the second dress with a jacket and both are okay for office wear (the first looks like it could be a bit casual, but it depends on the office and the material). Wouldn't use either for an interview, though.missvik218 wrote:I know what 'Business Attire" for men means, but got ladies does it mean the same thing or could you get away with a shift dress?
--ImageRemoved--
- missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
What about a day of orientation marked [Dress in Business Attire]?keg411 wrote: Pair the second dress with a jacket and both are okay for office wear (the first looks like it could be a bit casual, but it depends on the office and the material). Wouldn't use either for an interview, though.
- aIvin adams

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
i dont like those shoes. i like the darker brown posted above w a navy suit. this shoe might look better w bal laces and a different sole but as it is it looks... i dunno, informal.HJO wrote:I'm wearing brown shoes and belt with a navy suit for my interviews. These specifically...
-
keg411

- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I thought you were talking about day-to-day officer wear. If those are the instructions, wear a suit. Definite no on the first dress.missvik218 wrote:What about a day of orientation marked [Dress in Business Attire]?keg411 wrote: Pair the second dress with a jacket and both are okay for office wear (the first looks like it could be a bit casual, but it depends on the office and the material). Wouldn't use either for an interview, though.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- leobowski

- Posts: 511
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:11 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Waterman47 wrote:I'd wear brown, but a much darker brown than that. I think that shade of brown is a bit casual. And I hate that toe-cap style. Looks like something an old man would wear.
Pair of brown shoes I would wear to an interview:
http://www.bluefly.com/Ferragamo-hickor ... detail.fly
This is an expensive example, but there are many cheaper versions around. Notice that the sole and the top are the same color. This is much, much better than the black sole/brown shoe look.
I think, generally, if you're going to break from the mold in interviews/office settings, you've got to do it well. IMO wearing the light brown pair will make you look clueless, if the person conducting the interview is at all fashion conscious. But if you wear something like the Ferragamo pair, you could stand out for your chicness.
Those shoes are metro/goofy as hell and certainly less suitable for interviewing than a traditional cap-toe.
- Waterman47

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Not sure how a shoe that simple can be "goofy as hell", and I don't think metro is a bad thing. Either way, I'd wear those 1,000 times before I wore the light brown monstrosities posted above.leobowski wrote:Waterman47 wrote:I'd wear brown, but a much darker brown than that. I think that shade of brown is a bit casual. And I hate that toe-cap style. Looks like something an old man would wear.
Pair of brown shoes I would wear to an interview:
http://www.bluefly.com/Ferragamo-hickor ... detail.fly
This is an expensive example, but there are many cheaper versions around. Notice that the sole and the top are the same color. This is much, much better than the black sole/brown shoe look.
I think, generally, if you're going to break from the mold in interviews/office settings, you've got to do it well. IMO wearing the light brown pair will make you look clueless, if the person conducting the interview is at all fashion conscious. But if you wear something like the Ferragamo pair, you could stand out for your chicness.
Those shoes are metro/goofy as hell and certainly less suitable for interviewing than a traditional cap-toe.
-
notanumber

- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I know it's been mentioned in this thread before, but it should be reiterated: Everybody should just suck it up and buy a pair of black Allen Edmonds Park Avenues (http://www.zappos.com/allen-edmonds-park-avenue). They may seem expensive but they are well made (in America) and with shoe trees they will last for years. It's the go-to shoe when you want to project the inoffensive and safe "corporate drone" image. People who are fashion conscious will recognize the shoes and realize that you made the conscious choice to project this image, which will be a good thing. People who are not fashion conscious will likely not notice the shoes at all, which is also a good thing.
- Waterman47

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
notanumber wrote:It's the go-to shoe when you want to project the inoffensive and safe "corporate drone" image.

I'm starting to think there should be two separate fashion threads: one for all those who wish to don the "corporate drone" costume, and another for those who aren't afraid to inject some subtle hints of personal style even in situations that call for conservative dress. The former thread would be quite short.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login