Isn't LW 1900 and Sidley 2000?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:20 pmThis isn't an excuse. None of KE or LW have a floor (Sidley might, I'm not sure). The fact is that you're way more likely to have a >2000 year than a slow/1800 year, and this has been true since 2018 if you're in a major transactional practice. If you're getting paid "market" and you're billing >2100+, you're underpaid and no one gives a shit about prestige.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:26 amProbably because they have no minimum requirement?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 3:45 pmSeems like effectively none of the white shoe/heritage firms in any market go up over for high billers, sheesh
Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers
Fair point regarding Latham. Point stands in any case that if you're in a major transactional practice, you've been busy for a while now and shouldn't be afraid of coming in below any potential floor.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:28 pmIsn't LW 1900 and Sidley 2000?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:20 pmThis isn't an excuse. None of KE or LW have a floor (Sidley might, I'm not sure). The fact is that you're way more likely to have a >2000 year than a slow/1800 year, and this has been true since 2018 if you're in a major transactional practice. If you're getting paid "market" and you're billing >2100+, you're underpaid and no one gives a shit about prestige.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:26 amProbably because they have no minimum requirement?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 3:45 pmSeems like effectively none of the white shoe/heritage firms in any market go up over for high billers, sheesh
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers
Gibson Dunn pays an above market bonus for every office other than NYC. ..you know, one of the most expensive cities in the world where the associates on average bill higher than any other office.
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers
X is base plus special bonus or just base?
-
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms that Pay Above Market to High Billers
Not really this year. People billing 3,000 hours didn’t even get 1.5x.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:04 pmKirkland is black box but hours are a major component of above-market bonuses, with some very high billers (who receive excellent merit scores in annual review) approaching 2x market bonuses.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login