2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:57 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
I guess it's been over 10 years now but they did fire over 400 people in 2009. Agree that the stink should have followed them longer. That's not to say that other firms weren't shitty as well during that time. There were tons of stealth layoffs and entire summer associate classes that were no offered or pushed back a year. Going to law school from 2007 - 2010 was rough.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
LOL the ten-year stink. Do you bubbled speculators realize that even most T14 kids wind up at law school because they can’t think of anything else to do after college or don’t see a way forward in some dead-end job? Might be as little as two years from when someone thinks about the legal industry for the first time to when they do OCI. Most people just pick the highest Vault firm; they don’t even know anything the firm does now, let alone firings from three generations of associates ago.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
(Shameless prodding this forward)
Do we think there will be more announcements this week? Or are the masses waiting for Cravath to make a statement?
Do we think there will be more announcements this week? Or are the masses waiting for Cravath to make a statement?
Last edited by QContinuum on Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:02 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
There's no benefit to being the second mover here, so not sure why anyone else would announce earlier than usual if they are just matching. If someone wants to be a hero (looking at you STB), might make sense to go early, but if a big firm is going over the top they may also want to see Cravath first (both to make sure they are actually higher than Cravath and also so they can say they beat Cravath).Anonymous User wrote:(Shameless prodding this forward)
Do we think there will be more announcements this week? Or are the masses waiting for Cravath to make a statement?
In any event, I fully expect Cravath to announce a match of THE MILBANK SCALE next week and for every other firm to quickly fall in line.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
My prediction is that Cravath will come over the top now — even if they were not planning to before. Cravath is the BigLaw comp leader, and will put the maverick Milbank in its place. When Milbank raised to 190K last year and STB added summer bonuses, Cravath still had the final word. I don’t think they’ll stand by and allow it to be called the Milbank scale. Not many folks realize perception is a huge part of Cravath’s success.
— Current V5 associate with lots of debt hoping my theory of Cravath’s inner workings is correct.
— Current V5 associate with lots of debt hoping my theory of Cravath’s inner workings is correct.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Partners at my V30 have told me the firm is preparing with the expectation of a recession in early/mid-2020. If other firms are thinking the same, I would not expect an increase this year.
My more optimistic take: a well-situated firm could use a bump now as a chance to further separate the wheat from the chaff, since some firms probably couldn't keep up.
My more optimistic take: a well-situated firm could use a bump now as a chance to further separate the wheat from the chaff, since some firms probably couldn't keep up.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
if this were 2001, you would be right. however, cravath hasn't been a comp leader for more than a decade now. The last 3 comp leaders (which takes us back to the 160 scale) were gunderson, stb/dpw, and milbank.Anonymous User wrote:My prediction is that Cravath will come over the top now — even if they were not planning to before. Cravath is the BigLaw comp leader, and will put the maverick Milbank in its place. When Milbank raised to 190K last year and STB added summer bonuses, Cravath still had the final word. I don’t think they’ll stand by and allow it to be called the Milbank scale. Not many folks realize perception is a huge part of Cravath’s success.
— Current V5 associate with lots of debt hoping my theory of Cravath’s inner workings is correct.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:37 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Didn't Cravath raise to 180 in mid-2016?dabigchina wrote:if this were 2001, you would be right. however, cravath hasn't been a comp leader for more than a decade now. The last 3 comp leaders (which takes us back to the 160 scale) were gunderson, stb/dpw, and milbank.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
that's fair, you're right. i still stand by the general thrust of my post. CSM isn't the undisputed comp leader anymore. STB and DPW both are just as likely to set the scale.BrainsyK wrote:Didn't Cravath raise to 180 in mid-2016?dabigchina wrote:if this were 2001, you would be right. however, cravath hasn't been a comp leader for more than a decade now. The last 3 comp leaders (which takes us back to the 160 scale) were gunderson, stb/dpw, and milbank.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Cravath announced. Flat across the board for both bonus and base.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Davis Polk going to come back over the top to rebut their racial discrimination lawsuit PR.
Last edited by QContinuum on Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
- yodamiked
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
That was quick.Anonymous User wrote:Cravath announced. Flat across the board for both bonus and base.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
DPW, Skadden, STB aren't going to raise, K&E will remain 25-33% above market (no 2017 cushion).
Most firms are expecting a mild-ish recession. Cravath and Milbank are getting out ahead of a potential (although unlikely) raise - assuming DPW or STB fall in line that will be the market for the year.
Most firms are expecting a mild-ish recession. Cravath and Milbank are getting out ahead of a potential (although unlikely) raise - assuming DPW or STB fall in line that will be the market for the year.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
PW matched.
- yodamiked
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Looks like Fried Frank matched. I didn't have much hope to begin with, but I think the dream of a bonus increase is now dead.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
In DPW we trust.
Last edited by QContinuum on Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:20 pm
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Not gonna happen. New managing attorney, new lawsuit. No way. STB FTW!Anonymous User wrote:In DPW we trust.
Last edited by QContinuum on Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
The "looming recession" is just a straw man to justify flat bonuses...
https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2019 ... i-reports/
https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2019 ... i-reports/
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Can we talk about how cravath now follows Milbank's lead on compensation? Is it officially the "Milbank scale" now?
Also, comp at junior levels is too low now. I've heard of offers that are competitive with biglaw salaries for in house positions being offered to first (!), second and third years. Why the hell would anyone stick around if they can make the same money working less elsewhere?
Also, comp at junior levels is too low now. I've heard of offers that are competitive with biglaw salaries for in house positions being offered to first (!), second and third years. Why the hell would anyone stick around if they can make the same money working less elsewhere?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Current DPW Associate here. while I’d love to be wrong, I’d be beyond shocked if we raised associate comp (despite in general having a very good year as a firm).
As I understand it, there was some client pushback the last time DPW did this. That, combined with general (totally unsubstantiated) recession fears, fears about partner poaching at a lock step firm, new managing partner... yeah it isn’t going to be DPW.
As I understand it, there was some client pushback the last time DPW did this. That, combined with general (totally unsubstantiated) recession fears, fears about partner poaching at a lock step firm, new managing partner... yeah it isn’t going to be DPW.
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
Ugh how am I supposed to feed my family
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
This comment wins.LaLiLuLeLo wrote:Ugh how am I supposed to feed my family
I used to be in govt and I have become somewhat disgusted by the “issues” (with heavy quotes) raised during my periodic biglaw associate meetings.
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
I don't think BigLaw associates (or even partners) lose the right to complain about their work/pay just because other lawyers have it (much) worse*. That's like telling someone who got robbed, "hey, you've got nothing to complain about; don't you realize, but for your good fortune, you could've been born a starving orphan in Africa?!"objctnyrhnr wrote:This comment wins.LaLiLuLeLo wrote:Ugh how am I supposed to feed my family
I used to be in govt and I have become somewhat disgusted by the “issues” (with heavy quotes) raised during my periodic biglaw associate meetings.
*I'd also argue that government lawyers don't necessarily have it "much worse". In pay, certainly, but for many, the nature of the work, plus a (much) more humane work/life balance, makes up for the pay differential.
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
https://twitter.com/dril/status/3844089 ... 72?lang=enLaLiLuLeLo wrote:Ugh how am I supposed to feed my family
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: 2019 - Bonus Speculation Thread
I think he/she might have been joking.objctnyrhnr wrote:This comment wins.LaLiLuLeLo wrote:Ugh how am I supposed to feed my family
I used to be in govt and I have become somewhat disgusted by the “issues” (with heavy quotes) raised during my periodic biglaw associate meetings.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login