Summer Associate Class of 2016 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

What's the damage so far this summer?

I've actually lost weight.
37
23%
Essentially the same.
34
21%
2-5 pounds
34
21%
5-10 pounds
26
16%
10-15 pounds
10
6%
It's bad.
21
13%
 
Total votes: 162

User avatar
Vexed

Bronze
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:55 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Vexed » Fri Apr 15, 2016 12:37 am

Trippel wrote:
Vexed wrote:I've been thinking of taking up the role of resident grump. I feel like everyone I know is all "omg this summer is gonna be so fun!!!" while I'm over here looking at a 9-6 office job with a bunch of mandatory extra corporate back-slap events and wondering what the appeal is.

Is it just the money? Or is it part weird junior/midlevel Inception-type spin, where it's not that the actual SA itself is "fun", it's really just the last time you get the perks of biglaw without the crushing realities of the job, making the memory of the SA itself "fun"?
damn, dude. sorry.
looks like I'm gonna fit in this role quite nicely :lol:

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:00 am

Vexed wrote:I've been thinking of taking up the role of resident grump. I feel like everyone I know is all "omg this summer is gonna be so fun!!!" while I'm over here looking at a 9-6 office job with a bunch of mandatory extra corporate back-slap events and wondering what the appeal is.

Is it just the money? Or is it part weird junior/midlevel Inception-type spin, where it's not that the actual SA itself is "fun", it's really just the last time you get the perks of biglaw without the crushing realities of the job, making the memory of the SA itself "fun"?
Having worked real jobs before, i'm kinda looking at it the same way as you. The money is definitely going to be fucking sweet tho. My plan is to save as much as I can and blow it during 3L, the last year I'll have minimal responsibilities for a while.

Edit: accidental anon. This is bmore.

User avatar
acijku2

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:19 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by acijku2 » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:29 am

Checking in. Team not buying Park Aves. No offer? Looking forward to spending the summer freaking out about every critical piece of advice we get from partners.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:33 am

Anonymous User wrote:
hairbear7 wrote:What's the justification for spending $150 more for park over fifth? Honestly asking, I just wear Vans and Nikes :D
Class.

No but for real, they are an iconic shoe and neurotic people (most people in Biglaw) notice that kind of thing.
So if I only own black carlyles should i call my firm now and tell them i have to quit or is there a way to recover? i was planning on buying on the fifth aves in dark brown and just going back and forth. acceptable or no offer?

johnjay

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:29 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by johnjay » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:38 am

SplitMyPants wrote:
hairbear7 wrote:What's the justification for spending $150 more for park over fifth? Honestly asking, I just wear Vans and Nikes :D
There isn't one: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4 ... c&LH_BIN=1

Seriously though, it is slightly more versatile, but only insofar as I would not wear fifth aves to interview. Otherwise, they are interchangeable.
OP, does it really matter in Milwaukee?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


3dreamjobs

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by 3dreamjobs » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:45 am

Anything we should be doing to prepare for the summer? What do people think?

User avatar
georgej

Gold
Posts: 3109
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:55 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by georgej » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:57 am

Checking in in boston. I want to try to catch a seagull and keep her as an office pet. Anyone else have cool office pet ideas?

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by SplitMyPants » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:05 am

.
Last edited by SplitMyPants on Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by RaceJudicata » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:05 am

Checking in. Buying some Edmonds today, and "joyfully" saving the rest of my money for wedding ring. Wahoo life!


ETA: Not all the rest of my money, I'm not an idiot.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:14 am

georgej wrote:Checking in in boston. I want to try to catch a seagull and keep her as an office pet. Anyone else have cool office pet ideas?
The firm I was at last summer had falcons nesting outside one of the floors' windows. They would eat their prey up there.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:15 am

3dreamjobs wrote:Anything we should be doing to prepare for the summer? What do people think?
I'm going to try and work on my conversational skills in low pressure situations (like ones where the person is being paid to be nice to me.. person cutting my hair for instance) to build up confidence to not be too awkward to offer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:16 am

Anonymous User wrote: So if I only own black carlyles should i call my firm now and tell them i have to quit or is there a way to recover? i was planning on buying on the fifth aves in dark brown and just going back and forth. acceptable or no offer?
Depends on the firm. But for most in the v51 range, plain toe = no offer... Sorry, anon

User avatar
Trippel

Bronze
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Trippel » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:18 am

Checking in.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:28 am

AE's are nice shoes, sure. But definitely NOT necessary for SA. Or even first few years as an associate. My Cole Haans got me through fine this summer and are still in fine shape to last a while when I begin working at the firm this summer. And, IIRC, none of the guys in my SA class had AE's.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:32 am

Anonymous User wrote:AE's are nice shoes, sure. But definitely NOT necessary for SA. Or even first few years as an associate. My Cole Haans got me through fine this summer and are still in fine shape to last a while when I begin working at the firm this summer. And, IIRC, none of the guys in my SA class had AE's.
Outed as living in a fly-over secondary :lol:

But seriously, I would hope that no one actually thinks they need AE's to get offered... :roll:

Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:33 am

Anonymous User wrote:AE's are nice shoes, sure. But definitely NOT necessary for SA. Or even first few years as an associate. My Cole Haans got me through fine this summer and are still in fine shape to last a while when I begin working at the firm this summer. And, IIRC, none of the guys in my SA class had AE's.
Outed as living in a fly-over secondary :lol:

But seriously, I would hope that no one actually thinks they need AE's to get offered... :roll:

User avatar
MT Cicero

Silver
Posts: 692
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by MT Cicero » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:52 am

Checking in. Smaller market in the Pacific Northwest.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by BigZuck » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:52 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:AE's are nice shoes, sure. But definitely NOT necessary for SA. Or even first few years as an associate. My Cole Haans got me through fine this summer and are still in fine shape to last a while when I begin working at the firm this summer. And, IIRC, none of the guys in my SA class had AE's.
Outed as living in a fly-over secondary :lol:

But seriously, I would hope that no one actually thinks they need AE's to get offered... :roll:
I have a story for you two CRAVEN ANON COWARDS. This is the story: I was a SA in a flyover secondary market this past summer. Don't want to say the market because I'm not anon (it was Houston though). One day I was walking to lunch with 3 other male SAs and 2 associates. All 5 of them were wearing walnut Strands. I was the only one in the group not wearing walnut Strands! I don't want to say what I was wearing because I'm not anon (they were chili Carlyles though).

That is a 100% true story. No AEs=no offer is a saying for a reason. Because it's true (not really though).

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by BigZuck » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:54 am

Lolz Allen Edmonds sent me an email as I was typing that

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by SplitMyPants » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:05 am

SplitMyPants wrote:If you stick with black or darker brown, you can get away with a bit more brogue—at least in more formal markets like ny. In texas or atlanta, just wear whatever goes well with your seersucker suit.
BigZuck wrote: (it was Houston though).

All 5 of them were wearing walnut Strands.
Previous point proven.

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by PeanutsNJam » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:08 am

Can we talk suit brands? Is everybody sticking with Brooks Brothers/Suit Supply/J Crew level suits or is anybody really blowing their SA money on 1-3k suits? (custom suit, designer brand, etc.)

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
tyrant_flycatcher

Bronze
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:05 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by tyrant_flycatcher » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:11 am

BigZuck wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:AE's are nice shoes, sure. But definitely NOT necessary for SA. Or even first few years as an associate. My Cole Haans got me through fine this summer and are still in fine shape to last a while when I begin working at the firm this summer. And, IIRC, none of the guys in my SA class had AE's.
Outed as living in a fly-over secondary :lol:

But seriously, I would hope that no one actually thinks they need AE's to get offered... :roll:
I have a story for you two CRAVEN ANON COWARDS. This is the story: I was a SA in a flyover secondary market this past summer. Don't want to say the market because I'm not anon (it was Houston though). One day I was walking to lunch with 3 other male SAs and 2 associates. All 5 of them were wearing walnut Strands. I was the only one in the group not wearing walnut Strands! I don't want to say what I was wearing because I'm not anon (they were chili Carlyles though).

That is a 100% true story. No AEs=no offer is a saying for a reason. Because it's true (not really though).
I imagine it took some real courage to post this, so thank you for sharing. I don't know if I've heard of a more cringeworthy walk of shame story.

User avatar
Serett

Moderator
Posts: 16088
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Serett » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:32 am

johnjay wrote:
SplitMyPants wrote:
hairbear7 wrote:What's the justification for spending $150 more for park over fifth? Honestly asking, I just wear Vans and Nikes :D
There isn't one: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4 ... c&LH_BIN=1

Seriously though, it is slightly more versatile, but only insofar as I would not wear fifth aves to interview. Otherwise, they are interchangeable.
OP, does it really matter in Milwaukee?
In Milwaukee, the entire shoe brand discussion applies, but to boots. Even in the summer (better safe than sorry).

No AE winter line, no offer.

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by PeanutsNJam » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:35 am

The real rising stars at your firm will be wearing http://www.ralphlauren.com/product/inde ... Ai4t8P8HAQ while you proles still fret about shoes.

And your wallets at least best be burberry tier

User avatar
acijku2

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:19 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by acijku2 » Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:43 am

On the first day are we supposed to find the biggest and baddest senior associate and kick their ass? Do prison rules apply?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”