NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:33 pm

not sure why people think skadden wouldn't but csm would lol

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:40 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432607
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:48 pm

No, actually they don't.

The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.

User avatar
Elston Gunn

Gold
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Elston Gunn » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:49 pm

Anonymous User wrote:No, actually they don't.

The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
who cares about litigators though

deng

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 5:37 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by deng » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:51 pm

I don't see how this thread could have gotten to Four Pages long if it wasn't true.

NYC to 190.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:58 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:01 pm

If law students want raises, here's how to do it:
(1) start choosing other markets over NYC because same pay = higher pay with COL
(2) stop choosing V7 over V17 like it's a thing

The more I think about it, I think the problem is with retaining talent not necessarily getting it in the door. Bigger bonuses for the next couple years and maybe a 2d year to 200k and on up for class levels in 2017. They aren't going to pay 1st years more when everybody is already slashing each other's throat to get there. Gets the firm everything they want because law students and potential law students will factor int hat second year raise in their pay.

User avatar
Elston Gunn

Gold
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Elston Gunn » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:02 pm

In theory NY to 190! would be more about trying to keep midlevels from leaving though. Recruiting issues from OCI seem mostly irrelevant.

(Basically scooped by Johann.)

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:03 pm

I still got money on law school to 400k! before NYC to 190k

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:11 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1434
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Lacepiece23 » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:13 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:No, actually they don't.

The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
All 5 people they lose to those firms aren't worth paying every associate an extra 30-90k a year. Also lol shitigation
Lmao.

Hutz_and_Goodman

Gold
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Hutz_and_Goodman » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:30 pm

Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business

(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by MCFC » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:33 pm

Not sure that's the way reason #3 plays itself out.
A senior partner at one firm that reluctantly matched Davis Polk’s bonuses, cutting its profits by 4%, says furious clients have been inquiring why their exorbitant fees are funding associates’ Christmas shopping sprees—a thinly veiled threat to take their business elsewhere.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
bearsfan23

Gold
Posts: 1754
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by bearsfan23 » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:34 pm

Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business

(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)
4. It would also make some of us soon-to-be 1st years really, really happy. :D

A happy associate is a productive associate

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:39 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:41 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:42 pm

furious clients have been inquiring why their exorbitant fees are funding associates’ Christmas shopping sprees—a thinly veiled threat to take their business elsewhere.
Yeah that's what I plan on doing with more money, not pay down loans faster :roll:

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:09 pm

Desert Fox wrote:Yea even if comp went up, I see no reason why they'd give it to juniors. V5 have to bribe midlevls to stay. First years come for the prestige.
--Desert Fox before raises in 2000, 2005, and 2007

Hutz_and_Goodman

Gold
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Hutz_and_Goodman » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:38 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business

(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)
1. everyone will match
2. small impact. It's also not at all clear that people going to boies, etc. do it for the money. Also most of their recruits aren't for litigation.
3. i guess, but nobody cares. Who remembers who brought it to 145k or 160k. I don't know who did it. I barely remember DPW setting market this boneus season.
1. everyone will remember the firm and it will have a permanent reputation boost.
2 Other big law firm are unlikely to raise comp immediately so it will help with recruiting this year.
3 I find it hard to believe that clients are pissed about 1st year comp when partners at these firms routinely make 10-20 times 160k. Also, given how shitty the economy and particularly legal hiring has been I think this is a story that will get A LOT of play. Besides the major news outlets, every law school dean will be publicizing the raise in comp.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:43 pm

K I'm convinced this is a good idea guys, let's make it happen

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cobretti » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:53 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Yea even if comp went up, I see no reason why they'd give it to juniors. V5 have to bribe midlevls to stay. First years come for the prestige.
--Desert Fox before raises in 2000, 2005, and 2007
Lol exactly

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:57 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:57 pm

Thank god the fucking firsty ears are here to save the legal industry! This is definitely the class of all classes in the draft and we just absolutely have to let them know how much we value their contribution - 18% raise seems reasonable right?

User avatar
Elston Gunn

Gold
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Elston Gunn » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:59 pm

I don't think Tiago's point is that they'd be doing it primarily to attract first years, just that they'd probably also raise first year salary for whatever reason.

User avatar
wiz

Diamond
Posts: 44572
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by wiz » Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:02 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:Thank god the fucking firsty ears are here to save the legal industry! This is definitely the class of all classes in the draft and we just absolutely have to let them know how much we value their contribution - 18% raise seems reasonable right?
Rookie scale contract should go up in response to rising salary cap. NY to 190.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”