NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
not sure why people think skadden wouldn't but csm would lol
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
- Posts: 432607
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
No, actually they don't.
The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
who cares about litigators thoughAnonymous User wrote:No, actually they don't.
The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 5:37 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I don't see how this thread could have gotten to Four Pages long if it wasn't true.
NYC to 190.
NYC to 190.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
If law students want raises, here's how to do it:
(1) start choosing other markets over NYC because same pay = higher pay with COL
(2) stop choosing V7 over V17 like it's a thing
The more I think about it, I think the problem is with retaining talent not necessarily getting it in the door. Bigger bonuses for the next couple years and maybe a 2d year to 200k and on up for class levels in 2017. They aren't going to pay 1st years more when everybody is already slashing each other's throat to get there. Gets the firm everything they want because law students and potential law students will factor int hat second year raise in their pay.
(1) start choosing other markets over NYC because same pay = higher pay with COL
(2) stop choosing V7 over V17 like it's a thing
The more I think about it, I think the problem is with retaining talent not necessarily getting it in the door. Bigger bonuses for the next couple years and maybe a 2d year to 200k and on up for class levels in 2017. They aren't going to pay 1st years more when everybody is already slashing each other's throat to get there. Gets the firm everything they want because law students and potential law students will factor int hat second year raise in their pay.
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
In theory NY to 190! would be more about trying to keep midlevels from leaving though. Recruiting issues from OCI seem mostly irrelevant.
(Basically scooped by Johann.)
(Basically scooped by Johann.)
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I still got money on law school to 400k! before NYC to 190k
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Lacepiece23
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Lmao.Desert Fox wrote:All 5 people they lose to those firms aren't worth paying every associate an extra 30-90k a year. Also lol shitigationAnonymous User wrote:No, actually they don't.
The V5 routinely loses the "cream of the crop" to Munger, W+C, Boies etc. If they started paying 190, they might start to get some of those.
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business
(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business
(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)
- MCFC
- Posts: 9695
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Not sure that's the way reason #3 plays itself out.
A senior partner at one firm that reluctantly matched Davis Polk’s bonuses, cutting its profits by 4%, says furious clients have been inquiring why their exorbitant fees are funding associates’ Christmas shopping sprees—a thinly veiled threat to take their business elsewhere.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bearsfan23
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
4. It would also make some of us soon-to-be 1st years really, really happy.Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business
(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)

A happy associate is a productive associate
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Yeah that's what I plan on doing with more money, not pay down loans fasterfurious clients have been inquiring why their exorbitant fees are funding associates’ Christmas shopping sprees—a thinly veiled threat to take their business elsewhere.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
--Desert Fox before raises in 2000, 2005, and 2007Desert Fox wrote:Yea even if comp went up, I see no reason why they'd give it to juniors. V5 have to bribe midlevls to stay. First years come for the prestige.
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
1. everyone will remember the firm and it will have a permanent reputation boost.Desert Fox wrote:1. everyone will matchHutz_and_Goodman wrote:Reasons a big law firm will raise 1st year comp (in the next 4-6 weeks)
1. Will give them a recruiting edge against other major big law firms (paul Weiss, dpw)
2. Will allow them to recruit people who would otherwise go to boies and other places with higher starting comp
3. Will give the firm more prestige (ny times and many many other outlets will report on the firm that raised above 160k) which could mean more business
(Open list so add reason 4. and on...)
2. small impact. It's also not at all clear that people going to boies, etc. do it for the money. Also most of their recruits aren't for litigation.
3. i guess, but nobody cares. Who remembers who brought it to 145k or 160k. I don't know who did it. I barely remember DPW setting market this boneus season.
2 Other big law firm are unlikely to raise comp immediately so it will help with recruiting this year.
3 I find it hard to believe that clients are pissed about 1st year comp when partners at these firms routinely make 10-20 times 160k. Also, given how shitty the economy and particularly legal hiring has been I think this is a story that will get A LOT of play. Besides the major news outlets, every law school dean will be publicizing the raise in comp.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
K I'm convinced this is a good idea guys, let's make it happen
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Lol exactlyTiago Splitter wrote:--Desert Fox before raises in 2000, 2005, and 2007Desert Fox wrote:Yea even if comp went up, I see no reason why they'd give it to juniors. V5 have to bribe midlevls to stay. First years come for the prestige.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Thank god the fucking firsty ears are here to save the legal industry! This is definitely the class of all classes in the draft and we just absolutely have to let them know how much we value their contribution - 18% raise seems reasonable right?
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I don't think Tiago's point is that they'd be doing it primarily to attract first years, just that they'd probably also raise first year salary for whatever reason.
- wiz
- Posts: 44572
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Rookie scale contract should go up in response to rising salary cap. NY to 190.JohannDeMann wrote:Thank god the fucking firsty ears are here to save the legal industry! This is definitely the class of all classes in the draft and we just absolutely have to let them know how much we value their contribution - 18% raise seems reasonable right?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login