What firms would you take over Cravath? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
As a side note i don't know how this thread got taken over by SRZ but i think it does illustrate the general point [which should be noncontroversial] that vault rankings matter and you should go to the highest ranked vault firm you get offered from, unless you are set on a particular practice group where one firm clearly stands out, then go to that firm.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
which partner at SRZ would you say is the lebron james of hedge fund law?Morgan12Oak wrote:Depends on the time frame you're looking at; maybe be more like Celtics/Lakers are the W&C of basketball if you're talking about pedigree. That's the only similarity though really SRZ and W&C have nothing in common besides the fact that they are the best at a particular practice area.zweitbester wrote:So the similarity ends there, right? like SRZ is the W&C of hedge funds just like the miami heat are the W&C of basketball?Probably, it's just saying you're the best at your particular practice area/niche. Like saying your post is the Williams and Connelly of posts that are anonymous for no reason
- First Offense
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
How was that what you got out of this?Morgan12Oak wrote:As a side note i don't know how this thread got taken over by SRZ but i think it does illustrate the general point [which should be noncontroversial] that vault rankings matter and you should go to the highest ranked vault firm you get offered from, unless you are set on a particular practice group where one firm clearly stands out, then go to that firm.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Dunno, say they would be more like the 96 Dream Team instead; solid top to bottomzweitbester wrote:which partner at SRZ would you say is the lebron james of hedge fund law?Morgan12Oak wrote:Depends on the time frame you're looking at; maybe be more like Celtics/Lakers are the W&C of basketball if you're talking about pedigree. That's the only similarity though really SRZ and W&C have nothing in common besides the fact that they are the best at a particular practice area.zweitbester wrote:So the similarity ends there, right? like SRZ is the W&C of hedge funds just like the miami heat are the W&C of basketball?Probably, it's just saying you're the best at your particular practice area/niche. Like saying your post is the Williams and Connelly of posts that are anonymous for no reason
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Culture/all of that is bullshit. Like look at this thread, most of what people have said about Cravath in this thread is complete garbage and just plain wrong and these are the things that people are "considering" when looking at their fit. Like that one dude who posted that 13 first years have quit already. That's just not true.First Offense wrote:How was that what you got out of this?Morgan12Oak wrote:As a side note i don't know how this thread got taken over by SRZ but i think it does illustrate the general point [which should be noncontroversial] that vault rankings matter and you should go to the highest ranked vault firm you get offered from, unless you are set on a particular practice group where one firm clearly stands out, then go to that firm.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
o cool. i have a buddy who went to GW law. said it's the yale law school of IP law. youve really enlightened me that statement makes so much sense.Dunno, say they would be more like the 96 Dream Team instead; solid top to bottom
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Is billing 1600x2 a reality at V10s? The fuck? 3200 hours/year billable?
Cadwalader, kind of known for shitty work-life balance has ~2k average per associates on NALP... Is the 3k bullshit or is the 2k bullshit?
Cadwalader, kind of known for shitty work-life balance has ~2k average per associates on NALP... Is the 3k bullshit or is the 2k bullshit?
- Pikappraider
- Posts: 2430
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:32 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
bro you wouldnt take GW over yale for IP?????zweitbester wrote:o cool. i have a buddy who went to GW law. said it's the yale law school of IP law. youve really enlightened me that statement makes so much sense.Dunno, say they would be more like the 96 Dream Team instead; solid top to bottom
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
[youtube]FvNDQkcqkfU[/youtube]zweitbester wrote:o cool. i have a buddy who went to GW law. said it's the yale law school of IP law. youve really enlightened me that statement makes so much sense.Dunno, say they would be more like the 96 Dream Team instead; solid top to bottom
THE MAN IN THE MIDDLE from teh land downunder 7'1" David Nissenbaum
AT FORWARD standing tall at 5"6' from Chambridge, MASSUTWOSHITS. STEPHANIE R. BRESLOW

From WASHINGTON DC at Guard STEVEN J FREDMAN
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Derailed the fuck out of this thread.Anonymous User wrote:The SRZ troll is amazing.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
FUCK how will anyone ever get validation about their choice to take Cravath over DPWKidStuddi wrote:Derailed the fuck out of this thread.Anonymous User wrote:The SRZ troll is amazing.
MODERATORS PLEASE
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
dude, shut up. cadwalader is like the W&C of mortgage-backed securities.sinfiery wrote:Is billing 1600x2 a reality at V10s? The fuck? 3200 hours/year billable?
Cadwalader, kind of known for shitty work-life balance has ~2k average per associates on NALP... Is the 3k bullshit or is the 2k bullshit?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Not OP here - This really went from a promising thread that I was looking to for valuable information to completely useless quickly. Can you people drop the SRZ nonsense?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
As ridiculous as it is, the SRZ nonsense isn't really nonsense and think it is helpful in the overall discussion.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP here - This really went from a promising thread that I was looking to for valuable information to completely useless quickly. Can you people drop the SRZ nonsense?
- Holly Golightly
- Posts: 4602
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Yeah, I need to know more about how prestigious Cravath is, not SRZ.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP here - This really went from a promising thread that I was looking to for valuable information to completely useless quickly. Can you people drop the SRZ nonsense?
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
I think a lot of people bitching about the SRZ talk here are just DPW/STB associates who went to those V10 firms to do fund work and are tired of getting styled on everyday by SRZ associates.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Amazing.Morgan12Oak wrote:I think a lot of people bitching about the SRZ talk here are just DPW/STB associates who went to those V10 firms to do fund work and are tired of getting styled on everyday by SRZ associates.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
I'm also amazed by the SRZ troll.
I also love Morgan's repeat of the "VAULT IS EVERYTHING" flame.
I also love Morgan's repeat of the "VAULT IS EVERYTHING" flame.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Not flame. More than half of being a lawyer is reputation. saying applies to law firms as well.sideroxylon wrote:I'm also amazed by the SRZ troll.
I also love Morgan's repeat of the "VAULT IS EVERYTHING" flame.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Morgan12Oak doing some underrated as fuck trolling ITT
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
i liked it more when you were trying to import xo shtick that hasn't stuck here yet—Morgan12Oak wrote:Not flame. More than half of being a lawyer is reputation. saying applies to law firms as well.sideroxylon wrote:I'm also amazed by the SRZ troll.
I also love Morgan's repeat of the "VAULT IS EVERYTHING" flame.
could you try at that again?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Not flame. It's just funny that all y'all go to your undergrads and weigh rankings heavily, go to law schools based on rankings and all of a sudden when looking at law firms everyones like RANKINGS DON'T MATTER.
Like things are ranked for a reason. something that is ranked 1 is better than 2, etc. It's actually common sense that rankings go in order from 1 being the best and things get worse as the numbers get better. Like that's true... objectively.
Now going to the next point, where rankings become LESS important is where you are looking at a SPECIFIC area of law where the rankings are not indicative; i.e. as you are well aware because of the SRZ poster, hedge fund work at SRZ
Like things are ranked for a reason. something that is ranked 1 is better than 2, etc. It's actually common sense that rankings go in order from 1 being the best and things get worse as the numbers get better. Like that's true... objectively.
Now going to the next point, where rankings become LESS important is where you are looking at a SPECIFIC area of law where the rankings are not indicative; i.e. as you are well aware because of the SRZ poster, hedge fund work at SRZ
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:21 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
What do you expect though? People on here are used to being the best over the course of their entire life, and now that they have been in a highly competitive environment + had to actually interview for a job, maybe they didn't get a V2, V5, V10 or whatever offer. They need to justify this to themselves, and even though its a pointless debate with no clear conclusion, they want to convince others that they are in a better position.Morgan12Oak wrote:Not flame. It's just funny that all y'all go to your undergrads and weigh rankings heavily, go to law schools based on rankings and all of a sudden when looking at law firms everyones like RANKINGS DON'T MATTER.
Like things are ranked for a reason. something that is ranked 1 is better than 2, etc. It's actually common sense that rankings go in order from 1 being the best and things get worse as the numbers get better. Like that's true... objectively.
Now going to the next point, where rankings become LESS important is where you are looking at a SPECIFIC area of law where the rankings are not indicative; i.e. as you are well aware because of the SRZ poster, hedge fund work at SRZ
- Holly Golightly
- Posts: 4602
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
How tall were your interviewers at Cravath and how did that influence your decision-making process? And when are firms going to start listing height on their attorney bios? I'd like to know just how prestigiously tall all of the partners are before making my final decision.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: What firms would you take over Cravath?
Pretty sure it's the 2k.sinfiery wrote:Is billing 1600x2 a reality at V10s? The fuck? 3200 hours/year billable?
Cadwalader, kind of known for shitty work-life balance has ~2k average per associates on NALP... Is the 3k bullshit or is the 2k bullshit?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login