Loyola PLIP thread for 2011 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
When did you receive the callback for Dickstein?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Yea, when did you get it? Today?Anonymous User wrote:NYCAnonymous User wrote:Which office for Dickstein?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone heard from :
Dickstein Shapiro or Frommer Lawrence and Haug?
CB from Dickstein
Has anyone gotten a CB from Jenner?
I got dinged at Jenner Chicago.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Today. Made my day a little bit brighter too - was coming out of the worst interview in the history of interviews at OCIAnonymous User wrote:When did you receive the callback for Dickstein?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Congrats:)Anonymous User wrote:Today. Made my day a little bit brighter too - was coming out of the worst interview in the history of interviews at OCIAnonymous User wrote:When did you receive the callback for Dickstein?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
CBs from king & spalding, wilkie farr by phone
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Office?Anonymous User wrote:CBs from king & spalding, wilkie farr by phone
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
New Rule- if you are going to post info, post the damn office.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
sorry..both NYAnonymous User wrote:Office?Anonymous User wrote:CBs from king & spalding, wilkie farr by phone
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Ding from baker botts Austin - email.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
anyone been dinged by MBHB?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Ding from Baker Botts Austin/Dallas.
Has anyone heard back from Kirkland's LA office?
Has anyone heard back from Kirkland's LA office?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Anyone recieved a rejection email/letter from Goodwin Procter DC yet?
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
nope - not yet. but i may have mail back at my other address (not sure if it's still forwarding).Anonymous User wrote:Anyone recieved a rejection email/letter from Goodwin Procter DC yet?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
Knobbe anyone? My ideal firm. sigh.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
I am interviewing with them at the SFIPLA fair this weekend. They might be waiting for that round of interviews.Anonymous User wrote:Knobbe anyone? My ideal firm. sigh.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
I heard from them today
- erico
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:56 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
worst response ever.Anonymous User wrote:I heard from them today
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
As did IAnonymous User wrote:I heard from them today
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life. I had one non-DC-NY interviewer tell me that they are making final decisions in 4-5 weeks, so it may be a while before we hear back, for the non-biglaw people here.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
This. The interview lasted less than 15 mins, the only one I had that did not go the full 20 mins.Anonymous User wrote:0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life.
It was very obvious that these people had no real interest in me -- and that there was probably nothing I could have done to change that. The guy was yawning throughout the whole thing. The rejection was almost a relief actually. The idea that I might have had to accept a job there was unsettling.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
And this is why we hear about the ubiquitous "fit" model for firm matching. I actually had a great interview with them and it ran over time because we lost track and were engaged. They were very interested not only in my credentials, but in my interests outside of school. who knows..Anonymous User wrote:This. The interview lasted less than 15 mins, the only one I had that did not go the full 20 mins.Anonymous User wrote:0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life.
It was very obvious that these people had no real interest in me -- and that there was probably nothing I could have done to change that. The guy was yawning throughout the whole thing. The rejection was almost a relief actually. The idea that I might have had to accept a job there was unsettling.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
So have you heard back from banner?Anonymous User wrote:And this is why we hear about the ubiquitous "fit" model for firm matching. I actually had a great interview with them and it ran over time because we lost track and were engaged. They were very interested not only in my credentials, but in my interests outside of school. who knows..Anonymous User wrote:This. The interview lasted less than 15 mins, the only one I had that did not go the full 20 mins.Anonymous User wrote:0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life.
It was very obvious that these people had no real interest in me -- and that there was probably nothing I could have done to change that. The guy was yawning throughout the whole thing. The rejection was almost a relief actually. The idea that I might have had to accept a job there was unsettling.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
That's great, but I can't agree that it's really about fit in my case. They really, really just did not seem to care. Within 2 mins it was already clear to me that these people were only going through the motions. Perhaps because they had already met you? ;-P (my interview was on Friday).Anonymous User wrote:And this is why we hear about the ubiquitous "fit" model for firm matching. I actually had a great interview with them and it ran over time because we lost track and were engaged. They were very interested not only in my credentials, but in my interests outside of school. who knows..Anonymous User wrote:This. The interview lasted less than 15 mins, the only one I had that did not go the full 20 mins.Anonymous User wrote:0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life.
It was very obvious that these people had no real interest in me -- and that there was probably nothing I could have done to change that. The guy was yawning throughout the whole thing. The rejection was almost a relief actually. The idea that I might have had to accept a job there was unsettling.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Loyola PLIP thread for 2011
I mean i was the day prior, but i doubt that's the reason. who knows what's going on with people on any given day. given the description of your experience, I would have felt the same way about them if that had happened to me. That's why it makes it seem like fit. They don't fit what you want based on how your experience was.Anonymous User wrote:That's great, but I can't agree that it's really about fit in my case. They really, really just did not seem to care. Within 2 mins it was already clear to me that these people were only going through the motions. Perhaps because they had already met you? ;-P (my interview was on Friday).Anonymous User wrote:And this is why we hear about the ubiquitous "fit" model for firm matching. I actually had a great interview with them and it ran over time because we lost track and were engaged. They were very interested not only in my credentials, but in my interests outside of school. who knows..Anonymous User wrote:This. The interview lasted less than 15 mins, the only one I had that did not go the full 20 mins.Anonymous User wrote:0/4 at LPLIP thus far, 1 snail-mail rejection from Banner Witcoff DC, where the interview was the most awkward and inattentive (interviewers showed no interest despite the preselect, so I shut down from the start (p.s. for interviewers -don't choose someone for a preselect if you plan on ignoring their credentials from the start - you come across as only using me to build your interview skills and I will absolutely never work for you after that clown-show)) interview I've attended in my life.
It was very obvious that these people had no real interest in me -- and that there was probably nothing I could have done to change that. The guy was yawning throughout the whole thing. The rejection was almost a relief actually. The idea that I might have had to accept a job there was unsettling.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login