NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:39 pm

Desert Fox wrote:Yea I'm talking about taking the clearly less prestigious, if not unpresigious, firm over the other because I thought it was be a better fit.
I feel like somewhere in all your posts you've probably talked about fit=flame, or at least that people going through OCI/SAs can't really accurately assess things like culture, what its really like to work there, etc. but I could be wrong.

I pretty much just assumed that everyone was lying to me/pretending they were dope and being a lawyer is chill. I don't know, I could see choosing a less prestigious (whatever that means) firm if everyone there seems super nice and happy and everyone at the more prestigious firm seems like a nightmare. But during OCI/CBs at least for me everyone seemed pretty nice so might as well follow the prestige and/or $$$$$ (which can be different at like V10s vs V50s or whatever)

Hey so where's those compensation letters guys?

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:43 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:45 pm

if it's a smaller practice group you can tell fit from interviewing

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:46 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:54 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
El Pollito wrote:if it's a smaller practice group you can tell fit from interviewing
I think you should ding any group that can't assemble 5 people who can pretend not to hate life. But I think a lot of groups can do that while being miserable as fuck.
yeah but fit should encompass more than that

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:58 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:49 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:39 pm

BigZuck wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Yea I'm talking about taking the clearly less prestigious, if not unpresigious, firm over the other because I thought it was be a better fit.
I feel like somewhere in all your posts you've probably talked about fit=flame, or at least that people going through OCI/SAs can't really accurately assess things like culture, what its really like to work there, etc. but I could be wrong.
Here's my take: generic "fit" is basically flame. As I think I've shared elsewhere, the chillest-seeming group of attorneys I met during my callbacks (many years ago) was at an office of Quinn Emanuel. Seriously. Even in a small practice group, your impression from a callback--e.g., "these guys seem really chill and cool!"--is not completely worthless but it's very low value.

What isn't low value is finding out whether a firm or practice group has partners who (1) like working with junior associates; (2) respect an associate's free time, at least relative to big law standards; and (3) provide actual mentorship. If you can find a reasonably small group with a partner or partners with those qualities, that's a good reason to choose that job even if the firm has a lower Vault or Chambers or whatever ranking.

But the trick is finding that information out. You can't really determine those things at a callback because everyone lies. Your best best is to find associates who left the office after working there for several years. In general, those former associates will be brutally honest about whom they liked working with and whom they hated. True, those former associates' impressions will skew negative (they quit or were fired from the firm, after all), but they're the closest thing you'll get to an accurate picture.

User avatar
SweetrollStealer

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:48 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by SweetrollStealer » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:22 pm

rpupkin wrote:
SweetrollStealer wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:
SweetrollStealer wrote:Quitting my biglaw jerb this week so maybe that marginal increase in attrition is enough to get the NYC to 190K bus rollin'. You're welcome 8)
lucky SOB. where to next?
moar litigation but better QOL and better work
Sounds like flame. Sorry bro.
Tough, but fair.

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cobretti » Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:54 am

Isn't the point as long as people think they can determine fit, and it actually affects their decision making, then paying more than less profitable firms would still be beneficial? I don't see why it matters if deciding based on fit works or not when people do it either way.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
SweetrollStealer

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:48 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by SweetrollStealer » Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:03 am

Cobretti wrote:Isn't the point as long as people think they can determine fit, and it actually affects their decision making, then paying more than less profitable firms would still be beneficial? I don't see why it matters if deciding based on fit works or not when people do it either way.
But prestigious firms don't want to poach associates who would otherwise choose a less prestigious law firm on the basis of "fit" because they're catering to the associates who are predominantly motivated by prestige.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432651
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:29 am

Desert Fox wrote:Yea I'm talking about taking the clearly less prestigious, if not unpresigious, firm over the other because I thought it was be a better fit.
Does taking $180k over K&E/Paul, Weiss count? Because almost everyone in my class at D made that choice. The extra $$$ doesn't make it a clean comparison, though. For me it was 75% $$$ and 25% fit.

To clarify, this is at the OCI stage. Some who split summers chose the other firms.

kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by kcdc1 » Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:30 am

SweetrollStealer wrote:
Cobretti wrote:Isn't the point as long as people think they can determine fit, and it actually affects their decision making, then paying more than less profitable firms would still be beneficial? I don't see why it matters if deciding based on fit works or not when people do it either way.
But prestigious firms don't want to poach associates who would otherwise choose a less prestigious law firm on the basis of "fit" because they're catering to the associates who are predominantly motivated by prestige.
Ain't no lawyer like a prestige-seeking lawyer. But this is all beside the point because 190k == PRESTIGE.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432651
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:02 pm

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=235465
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Bump.

If anyone cares, Manatt is now 150 first year salary.
Hopefully this is the push that NY needs to 190!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432651
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:12 pm

For my life insurance, the benefits page says the coverage amount is 1 x annual salary ($200,000). NY to $200k?

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:For my life insurance, the benefits page says the coverage amount is 1 x annual salary ($200,000). NY to $200k?
OUT THE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Anonymous User
Posts: 432651
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:08 am

Paul, Weiss has still not sent offer letters to next year's summer class. Pretty clearly biding their time for PR purposes w/r/t shattering market compensation.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:50 am

Anonymous User wrote:Paul, Weiss has still not sent offer letters to next year's summer class. Pretty clearly biding their time for PR purposes w/r/t shattering market compensation.
Makes sense

We already have some confirmed firms moving to 180K, Paul Weiss is confirmed gonna drop the 190K bomb on all our asses

Looking forward to it, thanks for the update

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Byakuya769

New
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Byakuya769 » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:54 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Yea I'm talking about taking the clearly less prestigious, if not unpresigious, firm over the other because I thought it was be a better fit.
Does taking $180k over K&E/Paul, Weiss count? Because almost everyone in my class at D made that choice. The extra $$$ doesn't make it a clean comparison, though. For me it was 75% $$$ and 25% fit.

To clarify, this is at the OCI stage. Some who split summers chose the other firms.
People made choices in favor of something not substantiated and against firms that typically are market leaders on compensation???

Anonymous User
Posts: 432651
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:34 am

Hearing from someone who worked at P,W this summer that there are little hints and indications in his contact with his mentor and a couple other co-workers from the summer. Nothing definite, but along the lines of "who knows how much you'll be making," similar to things others have reported upthread.

Edit: anon fail. Lawschool90.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:37 am

Anonymous User wrote:Hearing from someone who worked at P,W this summer that there are little hints and indications in his contact with his mentor and a couple other co-workers from the summer. Nothing definite, but along the lines of "who knows how much you'll be making," similar to things others have reported upthread.

Edit: anon fail. Lawschool90.
Can anyone else ITT provide independent confirmation that these rumors really are the scuttlebutt?

TYIA

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by MCFC » Wed Oct 07, 2015 11:16 am

BigZuck wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Hearing from someone who worked at P,W this summer that there are little hints and indications in his contact with his mentor and a couple other co-workers from the summer. Nothing definite, but along the lines of "who knows how much you'll be making," similar to things others have reported upthread.

Edit: anon fail. Lawschool90.
Can anyone else ITT provide independent confirmation that these rumors really are the scuttlebutt?

TYIA
I can CONFIRM that I have read these rumors.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
First Offense

Platinum
Posts: 7091
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by First Offense » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:33 pm

After a certain point, rumors stop being rumors, and start being truth.

Now - it's the truth.

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:02 pm

BigZuck wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Hearing from someone who worked at P,W this summer that there are little hints and indications in his contact with his mentor and a couple other co-workers from the summer. Nothing definite, but along the lines of "who knows how much you'll be making," similar to things others have reported upthread.

Edit: anon fail. Lawschool90.
Can anyone else ITT provide independent confirmation that these rumors really are the scuttlebutt?

TYIA
I, too, continue to hear things from people

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Danger Zone » Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:07 pm

Traynor Brah wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Hearing from someone who worked at P,W this summer that there are little hints and indications in his contact with his mentor and a couple other co-workers from the summer. Nothing definite, but along the lines of "who knows how much you'll be making," similar to things others have reported upthread.

Edit: anon fail. Lawschool90.
Can anyone else ITT provide independent confirmation that these rumors really are the scuttlebutt?

TYIA
I, too, continue to hear things from people
This is DEVASTATING news for the non believers
Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8525
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by thesealocust » Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:32 pm

History is written by the winners.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”