yeeeepppppp #fishingforcompliments #humblebragAnonymous User wrote:I think I am more puzzled about how you've received 15 callbacks, whereas some people haven't even received one. I mean good for you, but your post probably rubbed some the wrong way.Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others? I did really well at EIW--I came out of it with 15 callbacks--so I don't think my interviewing skills were fundamentally flawed or anything. I got dings from firms like Cravath and S&C, which, okay, I'm not at the tippy-top of the class, but then I also got dings from Cadwalader and WilmerHale, both of which I thought were perfectly normal interviews. Then I get stopped halfway through my Latham interview to tell me that I have a callback if I want it, but then I hear nothing from Davis Polk. It's just weird, and seems very scattershot. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else? It seems like a very random process.
Georgetown EIW - 2016 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Whipped out that 13 inch cock I assumeAnonymous User wrote:How well was the interview going for them to stop you in the middle of it to offer you a callback? Like what was said that led up to that? Goodness.Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others? I did really well at EIW--I came out of it with 15 callbacks--so I don't think my interviewing skills were fundamentally flawed or anything. I got dings from firms like Cravath and S&C, which, okay, I'm not at the tippy-top of the class, but then I also got dings from Cadwalader and WilmerHale, both of which I thought were perfectly normal interviews. Then I get stopped halfway through my Latham interview to tell me that I have a callback if I want it, but then I hear nothing from Davis Polk. It's just weird, and seems very scattershot. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else? It seems like a very random process.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Yeah seriously. Top 1%?Anonymous User wrote:How well was the interview going for them to stop you in the middle of it to offer you a callback? Like what was said that led up to that? Goodness.Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others? I did really well at EIW--I came out of it with 15 callbacks--so I don't think my interviewing skills were fundamentally flawed or anything. I got dings from firms like Cravath and S&C, which, okay, I'm not at the tippy-top of the class, but then I also got dings from Cadwalader and WilmerHale, both of which I thought were perfectly normal interviews. Then I get stopped halfway through my Latham interview to tell me that I have a callback if I want it, but then I hear nothing from Davis Polk. It's just weird, and seems very scattershot. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else? It seems like a very random process.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Same poster here. Sorry, that came across shittier than I had intended. I'm definitely not top 1%, and I feel genuinely humbled by the invitations I received. I chalk it up to just being a decent interviewer, but I was definitely puzzled by why some firms seemed interested, and others just totally blew me off. There didn't seem to be anything the dings had in common, so I wondered if it seemed kind of random to anyone else. Fwiw, there are people with much better credentials than me that received fewer callbacks, so that just lends support to the unpredictability of the whole thing.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Come on, this has to be a troll job. Can someone smart enough to get grades that high be that out of touch? #homeschoolAnonymous User wrote:Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others? I did really well at EIW--I came out of it with 15 callbacks--so I don't think my interviewing skills were fundamentally flawed or anything. I got dings from firms like Cravath and S&C, which, okay, I'm not at the tippy-top of the class, but then I also got dings from Cadwalader and WilmerHale, both of which I thought were perfectly normal interviews. Then I get stopped halfway through my Latham interview to tell me that I have a callback if I want it, but then I hear nothing from Davis Polk. It's just weird, and seems very scattershot. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else? It seems like a very random process.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Most of the people reading this post are Georgetown students, so I doubt we have any more insight than you as to why certain firms schedule callbacks with certain people. Also, most people on this forum probably didn't do as well as you, so it would have been nice if you framed this question differently. You could have asked your questions without including the number of callbacks you received and the instant callback you received from Latham. If you had, you may have spared some of your classmates much unneeded stress going into the school year.Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others? I did really well at EIW--I came out of it with 15 callbacks--so I don't think my interviewing skills were fundamentally flawed or anything. I got dings from firms like Cravath and S&C, which, okay, I'm not at the tippy-top of the class, but then I also got dings from Cadwalader and WilmerHale, both of which I thought were perfectly normal interviews. Then I get stopped halfway through my Latham interview to tell me that I have a callback if I want it, but then I hear nothing from Davis Polk. It's just weird, and seems very scattershot. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else? It seems like a very random process.
I only mention this because I love my classmates and not all of us came out of this process equally. Some of my friends are going to be brilliant attorneys and got fewer callbacks than myself. While I feel lucky and humbled by this process, my heart is also broken for these folks.
The questions you ask in this post are:
1. Has anyone else been puzzled about why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others?
2. Is it just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with that particular interviewer, and nothing else?
Like you, I'm a student and have no idea why callbacks have gone a particular way, but here are some guesses:
1. Odds would say yes, there is likely someone else who has been puzzled about "why callbacks for certain firms, and dings from others."
2. No, it is likely not just a matter of whether you "hit it off" with a particular interviewer and nothing else. Other considerations could include: 1) need for the practice area in which you're interested, 2) your past experience, 3) your general demeanor (maybe the interviewer hit it off with you but thinks you don't have the right disposition for the job), etc.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Allen & Ovary ding
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Reed Smith (NY) and Linklaters (NY) ding
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Any idea what to expect with firms that have both dings and CBs reported, but you've got nothing? Just slower dings?
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Most likely unless everyone they called back turns down their offersAnonymous User wrote:Any idea what to expect with firms that have both dings and CBs reported, but you've got nothing? Just slower dings?
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Wilkie (Houston) and Kirkland (Houston) ding
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Where are people finding the GPA ranges for firms? Do I just ask OCS for a list? Sorry about the dumb question. I really didn't expect to strike out at interviews since I did very well for banking interviews in undergrad despite worse rankings.
- buckiguy_sucks
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Google Georgetown law careers and click on the OCS page, click on the applying & interviewing link, click on the recruiting events and networking link, log in, click on EIWAnonymous User wrote:Where are people finding the GPA ranges for firms? Do I just ask OCS for a list? Sorry about the dumb question. I really didn't expect to strike out at interviews since I did very well for banking interviews in undergrad despite worse rankings.
Not to be rude but how have people been going through this process without those resources
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
I deserved that.
- buckiguy_sucks
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Also get mass mailing, recruiting season isn't over yet.Anonymous User wrote:I deserved that.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
+1 This. A firm that I applied to through targeted mailing contacted me today about setting up an interview later this week.buckiguy_sucks wrote:Also get mass mailing, recruiting season isn't over yet.Anonymous User wrote:I deserved that.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
I am mass mailing now. I am going down the V100 list since I was top 10%. I just need more chances and get better at interviews. Thank you.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Are you mass mailing to firms with which you had an interview but no callback, or just firms with which you never got an interview?buckiguy_sucks wrote:Also get mass mailing, recruiting season isn't over yet.Anonymous User wrote:I deserved that.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Sheppard Mullin ding.
- buckiguy_sucks
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
The point of mass mailing is that it's ~mass~ mailing in that you are mailing the masses.Anonymous User wrote:Are you mass mailing to firms with which you had an interview but no callback, or just firms with which you never got an interview?buckiguy_sucks wrote:Also get mass mailing, recruiting season isn't over yet.Anonymous User wrote:I deserved that.
But if you already have an interview that's following up not mass mailing you wouldn't like cold email them your resume and a cover letter if you've already talked to them.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Just got a ding from Sheppard. Didn't even interview with them, just dropped off a resume to the hospitality suite. That's.. nice of them, I guess? lol
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
I guess communication is always better than silence?Anonymous User wrote:Just got a ding from Sheppard. Didn't even interview with them, just dropped off a resume to the hospitality suite. That's.. nice of them, I guess? lol
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:27 pm
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Any Dechert DC callbacks feel free to PM me. Summered there this year will be starting in fall 2017.
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Has anyone heard form any of the Delaware firms, specifically Potter Anderson?
-
- Posts: 432326
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Georgetown EIW - 2016
Same question. I have heard nothing at all from Potter Anderson either, one way or another. I vaguely recall, but not certain, that the female interviewer said they would probably meet on Tuesday (aka yesterday) so I assume we'll hear soon.Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone heard form any of the Delaware firms, specifically Potter Anderson?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login