Wow for serious, I'm refreshing and watching it drop. We're getting scrubbed. Damn the new TLS sucks.JohnnieSockran wrote:This may not be the case anymore...the number of posts on this thread on shrinking by the minute, so I assume mods are cleaning it up from back at the start or something. Who knows...Anonymous User wrote:This is the right take. If you think a post in a thread is not interesting, ignore/scroll over it -- not that hard. Don't try to police the content for others who want to engage in the side-stories, or bemoan the collapse of civilization. It's just a public place to talk to each other, FFS.minnbills wrote:I've been on this site a long time and I don't think it's any worse. People love to fight about money, especially lawyers, who are competitive and insecure by nature. The only real difference is that under old management the anonymous posting would not have been tolerated.anonnymouse wrote:
It's definitely that the new generation is insufferable. There used to be good schtick to fill the void between match announcements. Now it's just butthurt anons and self-satisfied trolls that aren't remotely funny. What happened to this bort?
That said, this is all pretty entertaining. It's the people who take it all too seriously who need to take a breather.
Also, I'm much happier with the new TLS where everyone is free to say what they want, even if they're obnoxious, rude, immature, or whatever. That's what makes an online board even semi-interesting. In any case, it's much better than the precious, self-congratulatory circle-jerk over on the new site who tone-police every post and ban anyone who doesn't toe the ideological party line or challenges their Overton window. I occasionally checked that site when it first started, it's pretty much a boring echo chamber of the same tired old posters, I'm guessing needy 3Ls or local gov lawyers who need a place where they can feel important. This? This is at least refreshing.
NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Delaying for firms that are eventually going to match or beat the Milbank scale is a bad look. Profits per partner at these firms go up 10% a year. Meanwhile associate salaries are down $40,000 in inflation-adjusted dollars from where they were eleven years ago. There's no good reason to drag out this long overdue raise. And associates and law students remember these delays (and the 2008 Lathamings, etc) when considering where to bid for OCI or to lateral.Marshallian wrote:Near the end of day 3, the silence really is deafening. Comparing 2016 to 2018 salary bumps...
2016
Day 1: 1 firm matches
Day 2: 5 firms match
Day 3: 14 firms match
2018
Day 1: 1 firm matches
Day 2: 2 firms match
Day 3: 2 firms match
Compare https://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/salary- ... ed-raises/ with https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/salary- ... 2018/?rf=1
Not trying to draw inferences or offer an explanation, just confirming it doesn't just "feel" slow--it is slow.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Seems like a mistake to me given the sheer number of views on this thread. For better or worse, it's bringing the boys to the yard.Clearly wrote: Wow for serious, I'm refreshing and watching it drop. We're getting scrubbed. Damn the new TLS sucks.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I am very surprised Cravath hasn't announced anything yet. What does it say about the #1 firm in the country, that it's been 2 days since the first raise, and they've been completely silent?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
The fact that there has been so little movement to me is compelling evidence that 200+ is probable. The fear or being leapfrogged must be very real, or else everyone would be piling on to 190.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
It says NY to 250Anonymous User wrote:I am very surprised Cravath hasn't announced anything yet. What does it say about the #1 firm in the country, that it's been 2 days since the first raise, and they've been completely silent?
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
ATL writers know what gets views.Anonymous User wrote:ATL writers must be bored.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/of-cour ... -salaries/
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Cravath’s revenues and profits are down ~5% YoY and they’ve lost a number of up and coming stars and rainmakers recently. It’s pretty unlikely CSM leads the way on this.Anonymous User wrote:I am very surprised Cravath hasn't announced anything yet. What does it say about the #1 firm in the country, that it's been 2 days since the first raise, and they've been completely silent?
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am
Re: NYC to 200k
All the more reason they send a signal and reassert their prestige by taking NY to $200k+Anonymous User wrote:Cravath’s revenues and profits are down ~5% YoY and they’ve lost a number of up and coming stars and rainmakers recently. It’s pretty unlikely CSM leads the way on this.Anonymous User wrote:I am very surprised Cravath hasn't announced anything yet. What does it say about the #1 firm in the country, that it's been 2 days since the first raise, and they've been completely silent?
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
It'll be them or KE. I know KE is the odd man out, but I've got a hunch they want to sit at the comp leader table
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Will definitely not be DPW. Just praying for S&C to lead us back into the lightClearly wrote:It'll be them or KE. I know KE is the odd man out, but I've got a hunch they want to sit at the comp leader table
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
K&E is more concerned about paying big bucks to lateral rainmakers than paying big bucks to associates. I think DPW, SullCrom, or, heck, even Weil are more likely to bump to $200K than K&E or Cravath.Clearly wrote:It'll be them or KE. I know KE is the odd man out, but I've got a hunch they want to sit at the comp leader table
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Weil just shortened partner track to stave off any sort of raise. They won't be comp leaders, they'll just follow.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I think Weil or Paul Weiss are more likely than V5. Can’t speak to experience at S&C but they’ve run out of ways to cut costs over here at DPW re perks and staff. Zero chance we pay more than we have toAnonymous User wrote:K&E is more concerned about paying big bucks to lateral rainmakers than paying big bucks to associates. I think DPW, SullCrom, or, heck, even Weil are more likely to bump to $200K than K&E or Cravath.Clearly wrote:It'll be them or KE. I know KE is the odd man out, but I've got a hunch they want to sit at the comp leader table
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Whatever the cause of the delay is, firms will need to sort this out within a few weeks, when OCI bid lists are due at law schools.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
what about skadden?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Skadden is cash poor.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
the fact that we didn't move today, which was when the partners met, tells me we are only interested in followingAnonymous User wrote:what about skadden?
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Weil is also going to follow, that's all but confirmed. Sull crom is our only hope
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
PW has an affirmative policy to only follow, to whoever suggested otherwise.Anonymous User wrote:Weil is also going to follow, that's all but confirmed. Sull crom is our only hope
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
The more I think about it, the more I think all of the firms that are slow playing this process compared to last time have no intention of increasing the STB package, but plan to just wait it out for the mover firms to finish and then just match. I'd say if there is no movement by the end of tomorrow, that the STB package is the end result.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
What does that mean?Anonymous User wrote:Skadden is cash poor.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
It means their cash poorAnonymous User wrote:What does that mean?Anonymous User wrote:Skadden is cash poor.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:23 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Tsk Tsk. Another Texan.It means their cash poor
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login