
2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
dwyf

- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 7:16 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Associate bonuses are bad PR, but the optics around ranking firms by PPP is ok? These firms say high PPP shows prestige, why isn't paying associates preftigious?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.Anonymous User wrote:DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!
LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
- OneMoreLawHopeful

- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:21 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- anyriotgirl

- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
what are unclean meat abstainers supposed to do?Desert Fox wrote:Bro, this is Amlaw 237 territoryOneMoreLawHopeful wrote:I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- jingosaur

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
I'm assuming that the beer is domestics only.
- cookiejar1

- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
lolol
NY TO PLEASE GOD JUST LET US KEEP OUR JOBS
NY TO PLEASE GOD JUST LET US KEEP OUR JOBS
-
WestOfTheRest

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Which is obviously a collective action problem, because no one is going to leave NY so that the associates who are left get a raise. The alternative is much more attractive2014 wrote:There just unfortunately isn't a business reason for DPW or its peers to raise compensation until they start to lose associates faster than they can efficiently replace them. It's been discussed at length how jacking up comp wouldn't do anything for recruiting so it has to be about retention and that just doesn't seem to be any more or less of an issue this year than it has been the last four or so. Absent a business reason, all of the hope is in altruism and the market just doesn't function that way (though it does make the DPW memo about being charitable that much more ironic).Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.Anonymous User wrote:DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!
LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
Plus even if a firm was altruistic, there is ALWAYS a business reason to raise PPP, especially at lockstep firms that rely on rainmakers taking (substantial) pay cuts to stick around, so the altruism would have to be pretty damn strong.
Tl;dr we need more NY people to exit IN MASS
Unionize....
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Dood those better be gfree buns or we're staging a hunger strike.Desert Fox wrote:They are serving buns.anyriotgirl wrote:what are unclean meat abstainers supposed to do?Desert Fox wrote:Bro, this is Amlaw 237 territoryOneMoreLawHopeful wrote:I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
Last edited by jbagelboy on Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
-
mvp99

- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
- anyriotgirl

- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hourmvp99 wrote:what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.anyriotgirl wrote:also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hourmvp99 wrote:what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
- anyriotgirl

- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
a strike and a work slowdown are different bargaining tactics2014 wrote:This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.anyriotgirl wrote:also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hourmvp99 wrote:what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Valid responseanyriotgirl wrote:a strike and a work slowdown are different bargaining tactics2014 wrote:This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.anyriotgirl wrote:also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hourmvp99 wrote:what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?
si, se puede!!!!!!!!
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
3l hiring thread about to be bumping sounds like. You guys have issues with authority. Admit you're fucked and have no power and eat your goddamn hot dog and gluten bun already.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Anastasia Dee Dualla

- Posts: 942
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:03 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
.
Last edited by Anastasia Dee Dualla on Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
War is over if we want it, brodwyf wrote:Associate bonuses are bad PR,but the optics around ranking firms by PPP is ok? These firms say high PPP shows prestige, why isn't paying associates preftigious?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.Anonymous User wrote:DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!
LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Gg. Well played biglaw.
Time to lock this thread before we get more depressive.
Time to lock this thread before we get more depressive.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
They're not going bigger 1mlh. jbq needs some new artwork.Anonymous User wrote:no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- TLSModBot

- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
NY TO HERE'S A GUN (and a single bullet for your bonus). Poor performers just get the locks taken off their 30th floor windows.
-
umichman

- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
y doesnt anyone follow K&E?Desert Fox wrote:Yea the firm who doesn't even pay market for 2099 hours worked is going to raise market. Even if they tried, nobody would follow. Nobody follows K&E.Anonymous User wrote:no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login