2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Bonuses will be _____ from last year

Up
57
38%
Down
11
7%
Unchanged
81
54%
 
Total votes: 149

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:49 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

dwyf

Bronze
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 7:16 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by dwyf » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:55 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.

Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.

The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!

LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
Associate bonuses are bad PR, but the optics around ranking firms by PPP is ok? These firms say high PPP shows prestige, why isn't paying associates preftigious?

User avatar
OneMoreLawHopeful

Silver
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by OneMoreLawHopeful » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:56 pm

Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:01 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by anyriotgirl » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:05 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
OneMoreLawHopeful wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...
Bro, this is Amlaw 237 territory
what are unclean meat abstainers supposed to do?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:05 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
jingosaur

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by jingosaur » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:09 pm

I'm assuming that the beer is domestics only.

User avatar
cookiejar1

Silver
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by cookiejar1 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:28 pm

lolol

NY TO PLEASE GOD JUST LET US KEEP OUR JOBS

WestOfTheRest

Silver
Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by WestOfTheRest » Fri Dec 11, 2015 9:21 pm

2014 wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.

Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.

The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!

LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
There just unfortunately isn't a business reason for DPW or its peers to raise compensation until they start to lose associates faster than they can efficiently replace them. It's been discussed at length how jacking up comp wouldn't do anything for recruiting so it has to be about retention and that just doesn't seem to be any more or less of an issue this year than it has been the last four or so. Absent a business reason, all of the hope is in altruism and the market just doesn't function that way (though it does make the DPW memo about being charitable that much more ironic).

Plus even if a firm was altruistic, there is ALWAYS a business reason to raise PPP, especially at lockstep firms that rely on rainmakers taking (substantial) pay cuts to stick around, so the altruism would have to be pretty damn strong.

Tl;dr we need more NY people to exit IN MASS
Which is obviously a collective action problem, because no one is going to leave NY so that the associates who are left get a raise. The alternative is much more attractive :D


Unionize....

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by jbagelboy » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:08 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
OneMoreLawHopeful wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:my firm is serving hot dogs at the holiday party--Not Flame.
I thought your firm was V38, but serving hot dogs instead of organic curry wurst sounds more like V62 behavior...
Bro, this is Amlaw 237 territory
what are unclean meat abstainers supposed to do?
They are serving buns.
Dood those better be gfree buns or we're staging a hunger strike.
Last edited by jbagelboy on Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by Big Shrimpin » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:09 pm

unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!

mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by mvp99 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:25 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by anyriotgirl » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:31 pm

mvp99 wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..
also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hour

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by 2014 » Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:11 am

anyriotgirl wrote:
mvp99 wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..
also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hour
This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by anyriotgirl » Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:16 am

2014 wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
mvp99 wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..
also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hour
This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.
a strike and a work slowdown are different bargaining tactics

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by 2014 » Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:18 am

anyriotgirl wrote:
2014 wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
mvp99 wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:unionize?

si, se puede!!!!!!!!
what about ethical obligations? lawyers can't strike..
also gonna be kinda hard to do a work slowdown when you bill by the hour
This makes it easier not harder, the partners lose revenue per minute we strike, we probably don't lose any wages at all since we can just call the strikes professional reading.
a strike and a work slowdown are different bargaining tactics
Valid response

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by Johann » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:01 am

3l hiring thread about to be bumping sounds like. You guys have issues with authority. Admit you're fucked and have no power and eat your goddamn hot dog and gluten bun already.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anastasia Dee Dualla

Silver
Posts: 942
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:03 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by Anastasia Dee Dualla » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:17 am

.
Last edited by Anastasia Dee Dualla on Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jkpolk

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by jkpolk » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:40 am

dwyf wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Actus Reus wrote:Part of me thinks DPW memo was a note to other firms as if to say, "we're not raising base salaries so don't look to us". It's like avoiding being a cartel while being a cartel. I'm sure they would match but they won't lead.
DPW is very image conscious. They are a conservative white shoe firm and they build their culture around genteel client service. Tom Reid has discussed bonuses with groups of juniors on occasion and explained (in his view) that the firm could afford and all things equal would like to compensate junior associates better with higher bonuses or salary, but they have to be extremely sensitive to clients' impressions, and it's a bad look when the client hears about the firm making it rain for associates whose work is of dubious value in the first place. That's why they are more comfortable raising compensation for mid-levels, but even there its a tough balance. So I think the bonus memo, as with everything else, was actually directed towards clients as a PR stunt.

Of course, another one of Tom Reid's goals is to increase PPP by a wide margin by 2020. So it's a catastrophically flawed set of priorities.
I know we've been talking about assholes all thread, but man, what a fucking asshole.

The firm has fucking exploded over the past six years (PPP up over 70%!) and we would totally give you a piece of that growth but OH THINK OF THE CLIENTS they'll angrily call us wondering why associates can suddenly afford to buy a house!

LJL at the fucking transparency of telling associates they can't get better bonuses because of client pressure and then turning around and telling clients you have to raise rates by another 4% because of associate bonuses.
Associate bonuses are bad PR,but the optics around ranking firms by PPP is ok? These firms say high PPP shows prestige, why isn't paying associates preftigious?
War is over if we want it, bro

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by jbagelboy » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:44 am

Gg. Well played biglaw.

Time to lock this thread before we get more depressive.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:30 pm

no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote:no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?
They're not going bigger 1mlh. jbq needs some new artwork.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:11 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by TLSModBot » Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:11 pm

NY TO HERE'S A GUN (and a single bullet for your bonus). Poor performers just get the locks taken off their 30th floor windows.

umichman

Bronze
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am

Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread

Post by umichman » Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:37 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:no announcement from Quin yet. any thoughts on whether they might go bigger given they scrapped their SA program this year in favor of being able to dedicate that money elsewhere?
Yea the firm who doesn't even pay market for 2099 hours worked is going to raise market. Even if they tried, nobody would follow. Nobody follows K&E.
y doesnt anyone follow K&E?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”