2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Bonuses will be _____ from last year

Up
62
60%
Unchanged
35
34%
Down
6
6%
 
Total votes: 103

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:33 pm

Yeah I have always been under the impression that it is extremely expensive to attend OCIs. Keep in mind too that these firms all do these 1L cocktail hours as a marketing thing already. If you can roll the screening process into it, it's a cost savings.

Plus hey, it probably keeps the bar tabs down when students think they're interviewing for a job instead of just drinking on some firm's dime.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Old Gregg » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:44 pm

Plus hey, it probably keeps the bar tabs down when students think they're interviewing for a job instead of just drinking on some firm's dime.
Cost-savings or not, a cocktail hour reveals the true value of OCI: an almost useless process that, except for rooting out the most socially awkward and most socially adept, reveals nothing about a candidate that you couldn't already glean from a resume and transcript.

I think Greenberg Traurig would do similar cocktail hours, but at their offices.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:54 pm

but aren't we all completely fungible and the only distinguishing factor is social skills?

mirage1287

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by mirage1287 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:02 pm

jbagelboy wrote: wow.

this forum used to be kinda chill. now it's truly coming into its inner striver menace. the 1L exam minutiae freak-outs, the rat out the cheater thread, and now this kind of shit.. not as fun these days.
Lawyers, like law students, are not "chill" people lol. Most of this thread is a good example of what you'll see in everyday practice - constant d***-waving and argument, just for the sake of argument, over things that really don't matter in the grand scheme of things.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:04 pm

pls describe what matters

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
SemperLegal

Silver
Posts: 1356
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by SemperLegal » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:42 pm

zweitbester wrote:
Plus hey, it probably keeps the bar tabs down when students think they're interviewing for a job instead of just drinking on some firm's dime.
Cost-savings or not, a cocktail hour reveals the true value of OCI: an almost useless process that, except for rooting out the most socially awkward and most socially adept, reveals nothing about a candidate that you couldn't already glean from a resume and transcript.

I think Greenberg Traurig would do similar cocktail hours, but at their offices.

One firm (East Coast office) just had the local office do a resume drop at my t14 and then gave everyone who passed GPA muster and made eye contact a CB (informally 90% CB rate) with a catered, in-house cocktail party. I think that ended up saving them money because they didn't have to fly in Partners/Associates/HR. Especially considering that most of us had 2-3 CBs in the city, so flights and hotel rooms were split between firms.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Old Gregg » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:45 pm

fats provolone wrote:but aren't we all completely fungible and the only distinguishing factor is social skills?
i question a process that uses sociopaths to hire non-socially retarded people. you think that V5 partner on this third wife with 6 child-support obligations that ruin his ability to purchase yet a third house and sustain a coke habit is the best judge of character?

KM2016

Bronze
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by KM2016 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:46 pm

zweitbester wrote:
fats provolone wrote:but aren't we all completely fungible and the only distinguishing factor is social skills?
i question a process that uses sociopaths to hire non-socially retarded people. you think that V5 partner on this third wife with 6 child-support obligations that ruin his ability to purchase yet a third house and sustain a coke habit is the best judge of character?
This is just too accurate. Lolz.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:02 pm

zweitbester wrote:
fats provolone wrote:but aren't we all completely fungible and the only distinguishing factor is social skills?
i question a process that uses sociopaths to hire non-socially retarded people. you think that V5 partner on this third wife with 6 child-support obligations that ruin his ability to purchase yet a third house and sustain a coke habit is the best judge of character?
just to be clear by "social skills" i mean the ability to hide your sociopathy when necessary. so in that regard i think oci is perfect

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
WhirledWorld

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:04 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by WhirledWorld » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:07 pm

.
Last edited by WhirledWorld on Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
existenz

Silver
Posts: 926
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:06 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by existenz » Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:20 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation.
I billed 2350 this year and took 4 weeks off.

FSK

Platinum
Posts: 8058
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by FSK » Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:26 pm

zweitbester wrote:
fats provolone wrote:but aren't we all completely fungible and the only distinguishing factor is social skills?
i question a process that uses sociopaths to hire non-socially retarded people. you think that V5 partner on this third wife with 6 child-support obligations that ruin his ability to purchase yet a third house and sustain a coke habit is the best judge of character?
You're the best poster on this board because of comments like this.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

911 crisis actor

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 911 crisis actor » Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:27 pm

existenz wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation.
I billed 2350 this year and took 4 weeks off.
(Works for Kotex)

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:48 pm

existenz wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation.
I billed 2350 this year and took 4 weeks off.
(guy who bills 16 hours per day)

Seriously, though, this is admirable. I don't know how people like you can work that many hours in a day and still put together coherent work product. More power to you.

Either you're a superhero mentally/physically or you are padding like a madman.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:56 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
existenz wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation.
I billed 2350 this year and took 4 weeks off.
(guy who bills 16 hours per day)

Seriously, though, this is admirable. I don't know how people like you can work that many hours in a day and still put together coherent work product. More power to you.

Either you're a superhero mentally/physically or you are padding like a madman.
Thats 10 hrs a week day, not 16
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:27 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
existenz wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation.
I billed 2350 this year and took 4 weeks off.
(guy who bills 16 hours per day)

Seriously, though, this is admirable. I don't know how people like you can work that many hours in a day and still put together coherent work product. More power to you.

Either you're a superhero mentally/physically or you are padding like a madman.
Thats 10 hrs a week day, not 16
My weeks are usually like 2-3 7-hour days followed by a really shitty 13-hour day or something like that. But yeah, you're right. I was exaggerating.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:49 pm

I posted this in Boutique Firm thread and then realized maybe it belonged here. Anyone have any info?

"Does anyone have any info whether Williams & Connolly will move its base salaries up now that its compensation falls well below the other firms' "base + bonus"? They may still be competitive for 1st and second years, but mid levels seem to be lagging now. If someone is going to sign on, it would bne nice to know what the total package will be.

Or whether clerkship signing bonuses at W&C will rise for the same reason? For example Kellogg is over 150 now for top COA clerks and WC is still below 100.

Bueller? Anyone?"

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by kcdc1 » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:18 am

Anonymous User wrote:I posted this in Boutique Firm thread and then realized maybe it belonged here. Anyone have any info?

"Does anyone have any info whether Williams & Connolly will move its base salaries up now that its compensation falls well below the other firms' "base + bonus"? They may still be competitive for 1st and second years, but mid levels seem to be lagging now. If someone is going to sign on, it would bne nice to know what the total package will be.

Or whether clerkship signing bonuses at W&C will rise for the same reason? For example Kellogg is over 150 now for top COA clerks and WC is still below 100.

Bueller? Anyone?"
A member of the W&C compensation committee chimed in earlier in the thread to confirm that base salaries would be raised. Grain of salt given that this is an internet message board, but it seems unlikely that they'd choose to lag the market in compensation.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:45 pm

:lol: :lol:

User avatar
First Offense

Platinum
Posts: 7091
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by First Offense » Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:00 pm

SemperLegal wrote:
zweitbester wrote:
Plus hey, it probably keeps the bar tabs down when students think they're interviewing for a job instead of just drinking on some firm's dime.
Cost-savings or not, a cocktail hour reveals the true value of OCI: an almost useless process that, except for rooting out the most socially awkward and most socially adept, reveals nothing about a candidate that you couldn't already glean from a resume and transcript.

I think Greenberg Traurig would do similar cocktail hours, but at their offices.

One firm (East Coast office) just had the local office do a resume drop at my t14 and then gave everyone who passed GPA muster and made eye contact a CB (informally 90% CB rate) with a catered, in-house cocktail party. I think that ended up saving them money because they didn't have to fly in Partners/Associates/HR. Especially considering that most of us had 2-3 CBs in the city, so flights and hotel rooms were split between firms.
Sounds SullCrom-y.

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Wed Dec 24, 2014 3:12 pm

fats provolone wrote:pls describe what matters
two chicks; same time

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Wed Dec 24, 2014 3:45 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
fats provolone wrote:pls describe what matters
two chicks; same time (0.1)

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Wed Dec 24, 2014 3:52 pm

"Client development"

thelawyler

Silver
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by thelawyler » Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:27 am

Looks like many firms will not match market. Interesting enough.
http://abovethelaw.com/2014/12/associat ... ustration/

Stroock matches. Seems to be a NY thing.
http://abovethelaw.com/2014/12/associat ... t-matches/

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:47 am

how did other people's NY market-matching firms do proration for class of 2014?

my NY V20ish didn't do a real proration, despite matching the market for all other classes, but just gave a flat $2,500 to class of 2014. Actual proration would have resulted in us getting about $500 or so more depending on start date.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”