UChicago OCI 2014 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I've found screener->callback much easier than CB->offer. I think if you choose firms wisely initially and meet the grade cutoff you are quite likely to get a callback, whereas converting CBs into offers is way trickier. Then again, that really varies by firm: some will offer upwards of 90% of their cb candidates, others less than 40%.Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I'm screwed.Regulus wrote:This is what I had thought about some other places, but it just turned out that non-TLSers had received CBs and not told anyone about it. I would be surprised if that weren't the case here as well.Anonymous User wrote:Wondering this too. Plus Proskauer, Milbank.Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Fried Frank? They seem uncharacteristically slow for a NYC firm.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Yea, the last two posts firmly place me in that category as well.Anonymous User wrote:I'm screwed.Regulus wrote:This is what I had thought about some other places, but it just turned out that non-TLSers had received CBs and not told anyone about it. I would be surprised if that weren't the case here as well.Anonymous User wrote:Wondering this too. Plus Proskauer, Milbank.Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Fried Frank? They seem uncharacteristically slow for a NYC firm.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.
Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
Kirkland, for example, calls back roughly a third of their screeners, or 30-odd people. Last year, they had something like 17 U of C kids in their summer class. This means that conservatively, they must have made offers to at least half the people they called back. They probably had to make offers to more than that, because some people likely turned them down for Sidley or Barack or Susman or whatever based on personal preference. So there's no way to say, your chance goes from one in three to one in two. But it does go up by at least that much.
I've also heard gossip that the large NYC firms have percentages that are more like 3 in 4 - as in, they make offers to something like 3 in 4 of the people they callback.
Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
As far as I know, the general consensus is that callbacks (particularly from firms out of town) mean that they are much more likely to hire you - after all, there's a fair amount of monetary investment in flying a student in, putting them up in a hotel, and taking them to lunch. However, exactly how much more likely is really hard to tell.Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
Kirkland, for example, calls back roughly a third of their screeners, or 30-odd people. Last year, they had something like 17 U of C kids in their summer class. This means that conservatively, they must have made offers to at least half the people they called back. They probably had to make offers to more than that, because some people likely turned them down for Sidley or Barack or Susman or whatever based on personal preference. So there's no way to say, your chance goes from one in three to one in two. But it does go up by at least that much.
I've also heard gossip that the large NYC firms have percentages that are more like 3 in 4 - as in, they make offers to something like 3 in 4 of the people they callback.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Friend got proskauer today. I'm crushed too.Anonymous User wrote:Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.
Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Reposting this: CB/offer ratios from CLSAnonymous User wrote:Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.
Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
As far as I know, the general consensus is that callbacks (particularly from firms out of town) mean that they are much more likely to hire you - after all, there's a fair amount of monetary investment in flying a student in, putting them up in a hotel, and taking them to lunch. However, exactly how much more likely is really hard to tell.Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
Kirkland, for example, calls back roughly a third of their screeners, or 30-odd people. Last year, they had something like 17 U of C kids in their summer class. This means that conservatively, they must have made offers to at least half the people they called back. They probably had to make offers to more than that, because some people likely turned them down for Sidley or Barack or Susman or whatever based on personal preference. So there's no way to say, your chance goes from one in three to one in two. But it does go up by at least that much.
I've also heard gossip that the large NYC firms have percentages that are more like 3 in 4 - as in, they make offers to something like 3 in 4 of the people they callback.
https://docs.google.com/a/uchicago.edu/ ... =399774523
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF
Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF
Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.
Anonymous User wrote:I'm screwed.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I've found that CB>offer is easier than screener>CB. With a screener you need to impress one or max two people whereas with CBs you have 4-5 to work on. It's more forgiving. Plus as someone else said here, at the CB level they're not looking to weed out people in quite the same way (or to the same degree) as with screeners.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
+1 I'm so fuckedAnonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF
Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.Anonymous User wrote:I'm screwed.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
official PW email ding. AF
DAT HOPEHowever, if you are interested in speaking with us about permanent employment after you graduate, please contact us again next fall.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anyone received or heard of an Irell cb?
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Proskauer ding
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I'm not the earlier anon, but I also got an email ding - Proskauer NY - and yeah they had only one interviewer.Anonymous User wrote:Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
NYC. Email.Anonymous User wrote:Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Any movement from Cadwalader ny or dc?
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Cadwalader NY CB yesterday evening. JM
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Skadden NY Ding AF/SS
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
So what does it mean if both dings and CBs go out and you have neither?
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Schiff Chi ding. LB
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Dude didn't OCS just send an email about this?Anonymous User wrote:So what does it mean if both dings and CBs go out and you have neither?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login