UChicago OCI 2014 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:24 pm

Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?

20141023

Gold
Posts: 3070
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by 20141023 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:31 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:37 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
I've found screener->callback much easier than CB->offer. I think if you choose firms wisely initially and meet the grade cutoff you are quite likely to get a callback, whereas converting CBs into offers is way trickier. Then again, that really varies by firm: some will offer upwards of 90% of their cb candidates, others less than 40%.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:37 pm

Regulus wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Fried Frank? They seem uncharacteristically slow for a NYC firm.
Wondering this too. Plus Proskauer, Milbank.
This is what I had thought about some other places, but it just turned out that non-TLSers had received CBs and not told anyone about it. I would be surprised if that weren't the case here as well. :|
I'm screwed.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Regulus wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Fried Frank? They seem uncharacteristically slow for a NYC firm.
Wondering this too. Plus Proskauer, Milbank.
This is what I had thought about some other places, but it just turned out that non-TLSers had received CBs and not told anyone about it. I would be surprised if that weren't the case here as well. :|
I'm screwed.
Yea, the last two posts firmly place me in that category as well.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:45 pm

Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.

Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
As far as I know, the general consensus is that callbacks (particularly from firms out of town) mean that they are much more likely to hire you - after all, there's a fair amount of monetary investment in flying a student in, putting them up in a hotel, and taking them to lunch. However, exactly how much more likely is really hard to tell.

Kirkland, for example, calls back roughly a third of their screeners, or 30-odd people. Last year, they had something like 17 U of C kids in their summer class. This means that conservatively, they must have made offers to at least half the people they called back. They probably had to make offers to more than that, because some people likely turned them down for Sidley or Barack or Susman or whatever based on personal preference. So there's no way to say, your chance goes from one in three to one in two. But it does go up by at least that much.

I've also heard gossip that the large NYC firms have percentages that are more like 3 in 4 - as in, they make offers to something like 3 in 4 of the people they callback.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:31 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.

Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
Friend got proskauer today. I'm crushed too.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:35 pm

Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Rahviveh » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Or it could be that the screener for one or more of those just got unusually busy. Proskauer at least told people it would be two days - and they only interviewed on Thursday. I wouldn't be surprised if they just didn't get to the calls today.

Or maybe they did and we just haven't heard. But I'm not giving up hope til end of day tomorrow.
Anonymous User wrote:Are you more likely, generally, to get an offer from a callback than a callback from a screener?
As far as I know, the general consensus is that callbacks (particularly from firms out of town) mean that they are much more likely to hire you - after all, there's a fair amount of monetary investment in flying a student in, putting them up in a hotel, and taking them to lunch. However, exactly how much more likely is really hard to tell.

Kirkland, for example, calls back roughly a third of their screeners, or 30-odd people. Last year, they had something like 17 U of C kids in their summer class. This means that conservatively, they must have made offers to at least half the people they called back. They probably had to make offers to more than that, because some people likely turned them down for Sidley or Barack or Susman or whatever based on personal preference. So there's no way to say, your chance goes from one in three to one in two. But it does go up by at least that much.

I've also heard gossip that the large NYC firms have percentages that are more like 3 in 4 - as in, they make offers to something like 3 in 4 of the people they callback.
Reposting this: CB/offer ratios from CLS

https://docs.google.com/a/uchicago.edu/ ... =399774523

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:08 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF

Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF

Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.
Anonymous User wrote:I'm screwed.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:56 pm

I've found that CB>offer is easier than screener>CB. With a screener you need to impress one or max two people whereas with CBs you have 4-5 to work on. It's more forgiving. Plus as someone else said here, at the CB level they're not looking to weed out people in quite the same way (or to the same degree) as with screeners.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any news on Hughes Hubbard, Cadwalader, or Fried Frank - all NYC offices? I'm still holding out hope at least another day for Cadwalader and FF

Hughes Hubbard gave callbacks within a day of screeners.
Anonymous User wrote:I'm screwed.
+1 I'm so fucked

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:45 am

official PW email ding. AF
However, if you are interested in speaking with us about permanent employment after you graduate, please contact us again next fall.
DAT HOPE

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:05 am

Anyone received or heard of an Irell cb?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:11 am

Proskauer ding

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:24 am

Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:32 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?
I'm not the earlier anon, but I also got an email ding - Proskauer NY - and yeah they had only one interviewer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:40 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding
Was that for NYC? Via email? And did they only have one set of interviewers?
NYC. Email.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:28 am

Any movement from Cadwalader ny or dc?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:33 am

Cadwalader NY CB yesterday evening. JM

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:03 pm

Skadden NY Ding AF/SS

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:13 pm

So what does it mean if both dings and CBs go out and you have neither?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:30 pm

Schiff Chi ding. LB

User avatar
WhiteyCakes

Silver
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: UChicago OCI 2014

Post by WhiteyCakes » Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:30 pm

Anonymous User wrote:So what does it mean if both dings and CBs go out and you have neither?
Dude didn't OCS just send an email about this?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”