Georgetown EIW 2014 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:28 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any CBs/dings from Akin Gump (DC)? Anyone know anything about their timeline?
Yeah.. I got an Akin CB last week
Who was your interviewer?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:28 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Dinged by Hogan DC just now.

Has anyone heard from Sidley (DC), Wiley, Jones Day (DC) or Wilkie (DC)?

Just got a Jones Day DC CB. Did my screener yesterday.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:29 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Ip people: anything at all from Kirkland (ny), Weil(dc), christieparker, leydig, latham(ny)?

+ any knobbe cbs from Ca?
I don't fucking get the amount of silence I'm getting. Decent grades, EE but not a single callback from eiw yet (thankfully, did have multiple from Loyola) Do firms not realize that tttransfer students are fucking retards?
just relax. i agree that the silence is unbearable, but, based on last year's thread, it is likely that a lot of firms will be making contact throughout this week. the fact that you haven't heard anything yet doesn't mean that much.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:31 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Ip people: anything at all from Kirkland (ny), Weil(dc), christieparker, leydig, latham(ny)?

+ any knobbe cbs from Ca?
I don't fucking get the amount of silence I'm getting. Decent grades, EE but not a single callback from eiw yet (thankfully, did have multiple from Loyola) Do firms not realize that tttransfer students are fucking retards?
Don't know what could possibly be your problem.

- IP tttransfer enjoying your "deserved" CBs

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Ip people: anything at all from Kirkland (ny), Weil(dc), christieparker, leydig, latham(ny)?

+ any knobbe cbs from Ca?
I don't fucking get the amount of silence I'm getting. Decent grades, EE but not a single callback from eiw yet (thankfully, did have multiple from Loyola) Do firms not realize that tttransfer students are fucking retards?
Don't know what could possibly be your problem.

- IP tttransfer enjoying your "deserved" CBs
Ugh...can't believe I wrote that...I really do apologize to any transfer students... I know how hard that process must be. I have multiple cbs from pre eiw, so whatev... Just frustrated

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone heard of any CBs/Dings from Pillsbury NY?
Got a cb last night, interviewer MM

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Dinged by Hogan DC just now.

Has anyone heard from Sidley (DC), Wiley, Jones Day (DC) or Wilkie (DC)?
Interviewer for Hogan?
WY

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any CBs/dings from Akin Gump (DC)? Anyone know anything about their timeline?
Yeah.. I got an Akin CB last week
Who was your interviewer?
JM

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:19 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Ip people: anything at all from Kirkland (ny), Weil(dc), christieparker, leydig, latham(ny)?

+ any knobbe cbs from Ca?
I don't fucking get the amount of silence I'm getting. Decent grades, EE but not a single callback from eiw yet (thankfully, did have multiple from Loyola) Do firms not realize that tttransfer students are fucking retards?
Don't know what could possibly be your problem.

- IP tttransfer enjoying your "deserved" CBs
OP was unnecessarily harsh, but your response is irritating. Making top whatever % at a school surrounded by people who barely broke 160 (if even that) on the LSAT, and failed academically throughout their entire lives, is not comparable to median at any T14; and the fact is that transfer students with technical backgrounds likely are siphoning off SOME (albeit a small proportion) jobs from GULC IP students, since transfers can leverage their technical skills in addition to Latin honors at their awful 1L school to prove that they can "work hard," when the more likely truth is that they were the only people of even average intelligence at their old schools.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Zindras

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:33 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Zindras » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:36 pm

Quality trolling right there.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:42 pm

Zindras wrote:Quality trolling right there.
I try.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:57 pm

Has anyone tried to send emails to show continued interest to those firms with complete silence?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:24 pm

Has anyone heard back from Latham SF, Sheppard Mullin SF, Kirkland SF, Wilson Sonsini (Palo Alto), and Morgan Lewis (SF)? Thanks!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:34 pm

IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:39 pm

Davis, Polk's ding by email. not surprised at all.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners
Probably has to do with our intellectual aptitude for the study of something more profound than Native American pottery. That, and we generally murder you luddites on the LSAT.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:03 pm

alright—let's keep it classy, georgetown.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners
Probably has something to do with our intellectual aptitude for the study of something more profound than Native American pottery. That, and we generally murder you luddites on the LSAT.
Can we move on? Getting tired of the whole IP, transfer argument.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote:IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners
you sure? top third 0 cb so far. desperate...

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:49 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners
you sure? top third 0 cb so far. desperate...
IP or not, continue mailing firms until you have an offer. Don't rely on EIW. So long as you are at least medianish, you will almost assuredly get a few CBs that way. If you are IP, then lower, significantly sub-median GPAs may also suffice (for PROSECUTION positions, that is).

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Anyone heard of any CBs/Dings from Pillsbury NY?
Got a cb last night, interviewer MM

Dang...

Thanks for letting me know, and congrats!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:03 pm

Any thoughts on whether it is better to set up callbacks that include lunch versus those that don't, earlier versus later interview times, etc.?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:09 pm

I tend to spill on myself so I took the afternoon slot.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Any thoughts on whether it is better to set up callbacks that include lunch versus those that don't, earlier versus later interview times, etc.?
It's better to set up callbacks that don't require lunch because doing so shows the firm that you're abstemious and cognizant of its limited resources. I'd say doing so increases your chances of an offer by 45.65%.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432326
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Georgetown EIW 2014

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:23 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:IP people are the worst. They get lower grades but more cbs and screeners
you sure? top third 0 cb so far. desperate...
Keep the faith friendo, we're all going to make it.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”