Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:JenDarby wrote:
Not sure why your post is anonymous, but the person directly said that it isn't just that "Atlanta is 'better'" but rather that it's specifically ties. Lots of people value family and such in a region very highly.
It's anon because I'm the same person who was discussing the TX lateral market above.
Okay, that's all well and good. But the person still has to consciously decide that family or whatever is worth $100k per year. That's all I was pointing out. You can buy a lot of plane tickets to visit whoever you want for that much money.
Please show your math on how you come up with a $100k per year difference.
Multiple people two pages back said King & Spalding raises base $5-$10 per year. I don't know what their bonuses are. Compare that to actual lockstep cravath scale. If I overstated the difference, I apologize. It sounds to me like it will be significant.
JenDarby wrote:
Even then there's plenty of other reasons not to want to live in TX. Money is obviously a factor, but clearly for many people it's just one factor, and not necessarily the most important one. Its very narrow minded to "not understand" why someone would go to Atlanta just because Texas pays market.
Yes, people use a variety of factors to make every decision in their life, including where they will live.
I live in a smaller market than ATL and can confirm a 100K spread on my prior comp after bonus, but plenty of people choose to live here, because we do work fewer hours (well under 2000 on average), normal family or other ties/interests in the region and its offerings, inheritances (think land), COL, etc.
Do I want 100K more each year and think that I am underpaid? Sure, I do. Is the 180 scale going to affect this market? Maybe biglaw laterals like myself and certain people on the fence won't keep coming, but it will only minimally affect local recruiting (and will probably help marketing and partner retention).
All else equal, I'd pick 100K, but there are a number of financial and non-financial reason as to why I would not move and while you see partners working remotely on a semi-permanent basis from time-to-time, much, much less common at the associate level. Also, all else equal, I would pick a non-law firm job, so there's that too.