(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Single-Malt-Liquor

- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Post
by Single-Malt-Liquor » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:06 am
1styearlateral wrote:Actus Reus wrote:Also, gtfo that JD intentionally waited to appease it's summers. Summers are a money hole for firms. The fact that these firms raised for summers is still insane to me.
Especially after the summer already started. Like, who's gonna quit their summer job two weeks in because they didn't get a raise?
I doubt they're worried about summers quitting, more like jumping ship during 3L. Once one firm raised for summers it kind of became a thing and comparatively speaking, its a drop in the bucket.
100 summers
Extra $380 a week for the last five weeks
$38K split between the partners.
They probably spent less time agonizing over it than it took me to write this post.
-
goodxkarma

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:15 pm
Post
by goodxkarma » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:07 am
Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
-
UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Post
by UnicornHunter » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:08 am
Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:1styearlateral wrote:Actus Reus wrote:Also, gtfo that JD intentionally waited to appease it's summers. Summers are a money hole for firms. The fact that these firms raised for summers is still insane to me.
Especially after the summer already started. Like, who's gonna quit their summer job two weeks in because they didn't get a raise?
I doubt they're worried about summers quitting, more like jumping ship during 3L. Once one firm raised for summers it kind of became a thing and comparatively speaking, its a drop in the bucket.
100 summers
Extra $380 a week for the last five weeks
$38K split between the partners.
They probably spent less time agonizing over it than it took me to write this post.
It is funny that some firms made it an even $3500 and technically their summers are being paid more per week than their first years.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:09 am
goodxkarma wrote:Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
What if you, like, want take a depo or be involved in an IPR or learn how the patent office works?
-
mushybrain

- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:08 pm
Post
by mushybrain » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:10 am
Yeah but those sucker summers have to live off that all year and take the bar. I'm ok with it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
mushybrain

- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:08 pm
Post
by mushybrain » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:11 am
Anonymous User wrote:goodxkarma wrote:Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
What if you, like, want take a depo or be involved in an IPR or learn how the patent office works?
Take a vow of poverty.
-
bern victim

- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:58 pm
Post
by bern victim » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:12 am
Anonymous User wrote:goodxkarma wrote:Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
What if you, like, want take a depo or be involved in an IPR or learn how the patent office works?
IP associates at GP firms do those things. i even do some small pros matters occasionally.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:12 am
Anonymous User wrote:goodxkarma wrote:Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
What if you, like, want take a depo or be involved in an IPR or learn how the patent office works?
(Fish equity partner)
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:19 am
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:goodxkarma wrote:Anonymous User wrote:3) New recruits are mostly STEM people from mid ranked schools that most other Biglaw firms have no interest in. HYS EE/CS superstars weren't going to Fish anyway, so this won't change much.
Wait, so where are you supposed to go if you top-level credentials but want to do patent?
High-ranked GP with a well-established IP practice, probably.
What if you, like, want take a depo or be involved in an IPR or learn how the patent office works?
(Fish equity partner)
Not going to Fish, but did choose IP boutique over GP for exposure to meaningful work. Guess I'll get paid less as a result.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
DELG

- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Post
by DELG » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:21 am
El Pollito wrote:wow the seyfarth memo is aggressive. you can just silently not match instead of admitting your firm is going under.
Can't find it on ATL where is this
-
lost129

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:46 pm
Post
by lost129 » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:22 am
You all are correct, I'm speaking from a smaller market where typical non-IP starting salaries have stayed in the 135k range.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:30 am
UnicornHunter wrote:Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:1styearlateral wrote:Actus Reus wrote:Also, gtfo that JD intentionally waited to appease it's summers. Summers are a money hole for firms. The fact that these firms raised for summers is still insane to me.
Especially after the summer already started. Like, who's gonna quit their summer job two weeks in because they didn't get a raise?
I doubt they're worried about summers quitting, more like jumping ship during 3L. Once one firm raised for summers it kind of became a thing and comparatively speaking, its a drop in the bucket.
100 summers
Extra $380 a week for the last five weeks
$38K split between the partners.
They probably spent less time agonizing over it than it took me to write this post.
It is funny that some firms made it an even $3500 and technically their summers are being paid more per week than their first years.
I had also been wondering about that.
-
camelcrema

- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:43 pm
Post
by camelcrema » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:33 am
Anonymous User wrote:UnicornHunter wrote:Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:1styearlateral wrote:Actus Reus wrote:Also, gtfo that JD intentionally waited to appease it's summers. Summers are a money hole for firms. The fact that these firms raised for summers is still insane to me.
Especially after the summer already started. Like, who's gonna quit their summer job two weeks in because they didn't get a raise?
I doubt they're worried about summers quitting, more like jumping ship during 3L. Once one firm raised for summers it kind of became a thing and comparatively speaking, its a drop in the bucket.
100 summers
Extra $380 a week for the last five weeks
$38K split between the partners.
They probably spent less time agonizing over it than it took me to write this post.
It is funny that some firms made it an even $3500 and technically their summers are being paid more per week than their first years.
I had also been wondering about that.
Wasn't this also the case at 160? First years made $3077 and some firms rounded up to an even $3100 for summers.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:35 am
I think this is all a political move by Cravath. Cravath can afford $190k, but they know that a lot of other firms would try to follow suit at $180k (and to do so would need to do things like take a partnership vote).
In the next couple years, Cravath, or a player at that level, will bump it to $190k, knowing that:
1) some firms won't be able to afford to do so; and
2) some firms that could possibly make it work financially will choose not to because some of the older partners will push back harder against the raise to $190k with the argument that "we just gave all those brat associates raises last year."
That's my conspiracy theory.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:36 am
camelcrema wrote:Anonymous User wrote:UnicornHunter wrote:Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:1styearlateral wrote:Actus Reus wrote:Also, gtfo that JD intentionally waited to appease it's summers. Summers are a money hole for firms. The fact that these firms raised for summers is still insane to me.
Especially after the summer already started. Like, who's gonna quit their summer job two weeks in because they didn't get a raise?
I doubt they're worried about summers quitting, more like jumping ship during 3L. Once one firm raised for summers it kind of became a thing and comparatively speaking, its a drop in the bucket.
100 summers
Extra $380 a week for the last five weeks
$38K split between the partners.
They probably spent less time agonizing over it than it took me to write this post.
It is funny that some firms made it an even $3500 and technically their summers are being paid more per week than their first years.
I had also been wondering about that.
Wasn't this also the case at 160? First years made $3077 and some firms rounded up to an even $3100 for summers.
I thought $3,080 was the extent of the rounding. I felt pretty good about my $3. Didn't know some bros had $23.
-
jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Post
by jkpolk » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:40 am
we got lowballed - they'll be another bump soon
-
smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Post
by smaug » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:42 am
lmao
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Bumi

- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Post
by Bumi » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:43 am
Why is ATL treating above-market comp firms as though they are behind Cravath? Keeping W&C on these lists is misleading.
-
smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Post
by smaug » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:44 am
Bumi wrote:Why is ATL treating above-market comp firms as though they are behind Cravath? Keeping W&C on these lists is misleading.
Is it though?
What's all in comp at W&C theses days?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Bumi

- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Post
by Bumi » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:48 am
smaug wrote:Bumi wrote:Why is ATL treating above-market comp firms as though they are behind Cravath? Keeping W&C on these lists is misleading.
Is it though?
What's all in comp at W&C theses days?
$200K for first years base. Also, nevermind, ATL took them off the regional list. That's Muphry's law for you.
-
smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Post
by smaug » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:51 am
Bumi wrote:smaug wrote:Bumi wrote:Why is ATL treating above-market comp firms as though they are behind Cravath? Keeping W&C on these lists is misleading.
Is it though?
What's all in comp at W&C theses days?
$200K for first years base. Also, nevermind, ATL took them off the regional list. That's Muphry's law for you.
With no bonus, right?
"Above market" is a bit of a stretch. Differently structured comp but let's not make them out to be way better than the pack
-
Monochromatic Oeuvre

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Post
by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:52 am
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Where's the anon who promised WilmerHale today?
Yeah, what is going on with this? With the exception of WachTTTel and Williams and ConnollTTTY (both of which are non-traditional comp models), they're easily the most prominent firm not to have matched. Moreover, all of their main rivals in DC and Boston have matched. Guess those clouds in the DC lobby really are as expensive as they say....
Idk man someone on here says vaguely that they're announcing yesterday, then says oops never mind they meet TUESDAY (GOOD GOD ARE YOU SERIOUS JUST HAVE AN AD HOC MEETING), then someone else says nope today's the day. Jerkin me around like a Covington DC associate.
I'm the vague anon from before. Management committee held an ad hoc meeting on Tuesday of this week, which is why everyone expected an announcement on Tuesday. Partners have their regularly scheduled meeting next Tuesday, which may be the cause of the delay. Bob and Susan are both in the DC office today to talk to SA. Otherwise I know nothing.
Oh thank goodness. Some SA will surely risk his/her offer by being a little too openly upset by the delay and we'll finally know more. That makes sense I guess but seems weird. Maybe they tabled it because some people want to discuss whether to match everywhere (i.e. whether to include Denver and the West Coast offices).
"We found the money for the raise. Say hello to 180 and goodbye to Kyle."
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login