NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8525
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by thesealocust » Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:25 pm

bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?

If this really is about competition for hiring SA's/1st years, that could create a weird situation where 1st years actually make more than 2nd years. Then again, I'm guessing it probably didn't work that way in the past
It was very common for firms to raise entry salaries before the financial crisis. 1st years were making more than 4th years for quite a while.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:29 pm

bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 84651846190 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:42 pm

BIGFED dood here--hoping for NYC to 145k

User avatar
wiz

Diamond
Posts: 44572
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by wiz » Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:01 pm

rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
One Salary Worldwide.®

User avatar
chup

Diamond
Posts: 22942
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by chup » Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:43 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Through the grapevine I've heard that firms might start bumping up in secret in the next couple of weeks.
No it's going to be at least 15 major firms making the move together. The reason the compensation move took so long is because there is actually some nuance to it and it's not as simple as every city moving to 175 or 190 or whatever it is. There's also been a lot of behind the scenes coordination between the firms making the move otherwise this would have been done in July (this last 2 sentence was speculation as to reasoning - everything else is confirmed). 190 for NYC and 175 for the rest wouldn't surprise me.
*DOJ's ears perking up*

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
chup

Diamond
Posts: 22942
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by chup » Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:56 pm

Holy shit this thread has been productive today. I didn't realize that post was like 5 pages back.

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8525
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by thesealocust » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:06 pm

We're doing God's work

lawschool90

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lawschool90 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:12 pm

rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8525
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by thesealocust » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:17 pm

lawschool90 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens
Not with that attitude it won't.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


lawschool90

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lawschool90 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:18 pm

thesealocust wrote:
lawschool90 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens
Not with that attitude it won't.
Midlevels are going to accept a pay cut from 230k to 190k?

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by jbagelboy » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:20 pm

rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
nah. it's all going up. the memo provided a rough scale from 190k, staggered lockstep but even more generous deltas than before. think big, friends.
Last edited by jbagelboy on Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by El Pollito » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:20 pm

lawschool90 wrote:
thesealocust wrote:
lawschool90 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens
Not with that attitude it won't.
Midlevels are going to accept a pay cut from 230k to 190k?
What are they going to do, lateral?

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by UnicornHunter » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:30 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
nah. it's all going up. the memo provided a rough scale from 190k, staggered lockstep but even more generous deltas than before. think big, friends.
Did someone say non-equity partner to 1 mil? I think so.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


lawschool90

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lawschool90 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:37 pm

El Pollito wrote:
lawschool90 wrote:
thesealocust wrote:
lawschool90 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens
Not with that attitude it won't.
Midlevels are going to accept a pay cut from 230k to 190k?
What are they going to do, lateral?
Use common sense. The only incentive to do biglaw is money. Not enough people will be incentivized to stay if the pay scale is flat.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:40 pm

The thread is more fun to read when you pretend the trollees are the trollers

Otherwise it's just kinda sad

User avatar
bearsfan23

Gold
Posts: 1754
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by bearsfan23 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:40 pm

NY firms could probably afford to give everyone raises if they didn't insist on having super nice offices in the most expensive parts of the city.

If PW just moved to Jersey City or Queens or somewhere like that, $190k would be nothing

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:43 pm

There was at least one NYC office that no joke considered moving to Brooklyn a while ago.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:19 am

lawschool90 wrote:
El Pollito wrote:
lawschool90 wrote: Midlevels are going to accept a pay cut from 230k to 190k?
What are they going to do, lateral?
Use common sense. The only incentive to do biglaw is money. Not enough people will be incentivized to stay if the pay scale is flat.
I am using common sense, my friend. As has already been established by an authority no less venerable than Johann, the big law firms collude to set associate pay. Do you think Paul Weiss would be stupid enough to unilaterally reduce fifth-year pay from $230K to $190K? Of course not. But if they reduced pay in coordination with all the major law firms, their midlevels will have the same incentive to stay—no more, no less—as they have now.

Don't get me wrong: midlevels (and especially seniors) will be upset. But you can't make an omelette without cracking a few eggs. No one said that NY to 190K would be bloodless.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:51 am

Idk how I feel about all the horse play going on in this thread's pool.


You're all being awfully cavalier with a lot of people's lives.

- George Clooney. Ocean's 12. Good flick, holds up over time, recommend a repeat viewing if like me you didn't care for it when it first came out.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:55 am

lawschool90 wrote:
thesealocust wrote:
lawschool90 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
bearsfan23 wrote:Maybe this has been answered but when NY goes to 190k so very, very soon, will all levels of associates get salary raises?
I think the idea is that all associate salaries go to $190K. That's what makes this move affordable for the big law firms. You can afford to raise first-year associate pay from $160K to $190K if you cut fifth-year associate pay from $230K to $190K. True, there are more junior associates than senior associates, but it'll mostly even out in the end.
No way this happens
Not with that attitude it won't.
Midlevels are going to accept a pay cut from 230k to 190k?
I think you misunderstood. They were talking about what Jones Day would do to follow but in actuality they've already done this except the part about raising first years.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by TLSModBot » Fri Aug 28, 2015 6:27 am

Shit I've lost track of who is trolling and who isn't. All I can do is hang onto the hope Johann provides ITT and the sage wisdom Zuck and rpupkin have been sharing.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
xael

Platinum
Posts: 7548
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:18 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by xael » Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:37 am

I'm just saying that that text was 100% true and she had just walked out of PW so what more proof do we need

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by MCFC » Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:37 am

xael wrote:Things ATL will steal from TLS: posts from the Vale; a picture of a Davis Polk Selfie Stick™

Things ATL refuses to pick up from TLS: the story of the decade
And then the Latham SA story which exists in some weird middle zone.
bearsfan23 wrote:NY firms could probably afford to give everyone raises if they didn't insist on having super nice offices in the most expensive parts of the city.

If PW just moved to Jersey City or Queens or somewhere like that, $190k would be nothing
PW to 190 Fordham Road.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:53 am

David Boies here, I am anon because I don't want you to know who I normally post as. I know there's a rumor that I am Desert Fox. FAT (pun intended) chance. That is a total CANARD.

I just wanted you to know that all of the named partners of the V50 firms met this morning (except for fucking Swaine cause he's a a dick, and Dickstien Shaprio because obviously that is a made up alias for Justice Scalia, who couldn't make it).

I am happy to announce that the NY Committee on Price Fixing and Cartels has agreed on a revolutionary compensation system that you will all get behind. Here is a summary: In order to reduce payroll costs, all compensation will be in the form of once-a-year bearer bonds. Each Associates paycheck will be randomized and hidden in the office between the hours of 2:00am and 3:30am. First come, first serve. Let the odds be ever in your favor.

P.S. Also your vacations are all cancelled. As is Christmas.

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8525
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by thesealocust » Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:57 am

I wish there were award points we could distribute for use of anon. Carrots and sticks and all.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”