Quinn Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432629
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Quinn

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Feb 24, 2023 5:52 pm

thisismytlsuername wrote:
Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:39 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2023 9:52 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2023 9:48 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2023 9:36 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:34 pm
Regarding minimal management: does Quinn do reviews?

Yes but they are VERY perfunctory and do not affect compensation.
What are hours like? (someone considering an offer)
You need to hit 2100 to get a full bonus. I’ve billed around 2150 most years, except for one outlier year where I went to multiple trials and hit 2400.
2400 with multiple trials? Did you also take multiple months off?
To be clear, it was 2 trials that year and I didn’t take months off—just some slower months mixed in with vacations here and there to balance out the busy seasons.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432629
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Quinn

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Feb 24, 2023 6:10 pm

Former QE associate here. My hours ranged from 2150-2400 per year, including up to ~100 for pro bono. Pay was generally a bit above market because of 2021 special bonus hour bumps above 2200, annual bonus hour bumps above 2400, and retention bonuses vesting after a certain number of years at the firm.

The vitriol in this thread feels misplaced. QE has a strong roster of partners across pretty much every area of litigation. If you want to learn to learn to be a general litigator, I don't think there are many better places apart from the top boutiques. And QE does a good job of giving associates meaningful opportunities if they want them--probably a bit less so than a shop like Susman, but definitely better than the usual v15 firms that I've been across.

Internally, I found most people quite pleasant to work with and appreciated the lack of formality and rigid hierarchies--people don't really care where or how you're working as long as the work is done well. I have no insight into how QE came across from the other side, but the positions we took never struck me as unusually aggressive. Nor do I think our tone was ever out of line in comparison to the other side's, but it may just be that I worked with more reasonable partners. Most of QE's work product seemed quite good in comparison to peer firms. I wished certain partners wouldn't save everything for the last minute (and I think the work product would have been better for it), but I suspect that tendency exists across firms.

I had never heard of exit options being limited for anyone because of QE's negative reputation, and didn't encounter that when I left. The options I had were roughly commensurate with my non-QE qualifications, and maybe slightly better than they would have been had I gotten fewer stand up opportunities while litigating at one of the larger v15 firms.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”