Doctor v. Esquire Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432633
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 08, 2022 4:34 pm

aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:44 pm

Awesome, so I was right (there are lawyers who call themselves Doctors, as befitting their education and background) and the others here were wrong ("no lawyers without an MD or PhD calls him or herself a Doctor"). You sound pretty angry with this punching business, I would consider lowering your blood pressure.
Thanks for the diagnosis, doc!

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 4:35 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 4:34 pm
aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:44 pm

Awesome, so I was right (there are lawyers who call themselves Doctors, as befitting their education and background) and the others here were wrong ("no lawyers without an MD or PhD calls him or herself a Doctor"). You sound pretty angry with this punching business, I would consider lowering your blood pressure.
Thanks for the diagnosis, doc!
Hmmmmmm, you seem to suffer from "I Think Anonymous Strangers on Internet Forums Are Wrong" Syndrome.

Sackboy

Silver
Posts: 1045
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Sackboy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm

Mods, just lock this thread.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432633
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:18 pm

Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
:roll:

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:43 pm

nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
I am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:47 pm

aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:43 pm
nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
I am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.
I mean you’ve already shown yourself to be a fount of ill-informed bad opinions, so keep going.

Also you’re not even the JD kind of doctor so I don’t know what “we” you’re talking about.

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:49 pm

nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:47 pm
aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:43 pm
nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
I am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.
I mean you’ve already shown yourself to be a fount of ill-informed bad opinions, so keep going.

Also you’re not even the JD kind if doctor so I don’t know what “we” you’re talking about.
Got it, some education hack degree that is a glorified jobs program for Delaware's finest merits the Doctor title but YLS is suspect. Because Lawgic.

"JD kind if [sic] doctor" thanks for acknowledging the JD holders are doctors too.

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pm

No one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.

(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:13 pm

nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pm
No one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.

(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
Phew, that was a mouthful! That FB group may have served its purpose now that enough literature is out there on the matter.

All I did was ask when it can make sense to go by Doctor, and I gave a few examples. I would not be so closed minded on the question. Surely, there are situations to do it.

MountainMama

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:56 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by MountainMama » Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm

Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432633
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm

MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.

becodalapa

New
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:08 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by becodalapa » Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:20 pm

aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:13 pm
nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pm
No one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.

(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
. . .

Surely, there are situations to do it.
No. There are not.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:23 pm

becodalapa wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:20 pm
aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:13 pm
nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pm
No one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.

(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
. . .

Surely, there are situations to do it.
No. There are not.
Way ahead of you guy. We already covered them. Keep up.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432633
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm
MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.
You clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:03 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm
MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.
He was also a sockpuppet, the creation of the same guy who made up Johnny B Goode or whatever his username was. This one sounds kind of the same, though, in insisting that things that aren't real actually are. That's been a pretty consistent thread throughout his fake accounts.

Edit: scooped. FTR it was this guy: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=256455

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm
MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.
You clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.
Silly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432633
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:14 am

aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:53 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm
MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.
You clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.
Silly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.
Yeah? Too busy with your doctor stuff?

Res Ipsa Loquitter

Bronze
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by Res Ipsa Loquitter » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am

nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 am

Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am
nixy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pm
barre777 wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:05 am
Wasn't there a very recent controversy about Dr Jill Biden?

Or am I listening to the Ben Shapiro podcast too much.
She has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.
Sackboy wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:11 pm
Mods, just lock this thread.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 am

aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 am
Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?
Thanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:27 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:14 am
aspiring0L wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:53 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pm
MountainMama wrote:
Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pm
Lesion of Doom wrote:
Wed Sep 07, 2022 8:39 pm
OP obviously is trolling. C’mon, y’all
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
He was a tool. And from Orlando.
You clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.
Silly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.
Yeah? Too busy with your doctor stuff?
Too busy not being scared to write under a pseud, anonymous

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:29 am

nixy wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 am
aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 am
Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?
Thanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.
Lol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.

nixy

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by nixy » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:38 am

aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:29 am
nixy wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 am
aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 am
Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?
Thanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.
Lol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.
Poor troll, so mad.

aspiring0L

New
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm

Re: Doctor v. Esquire

Post by aspiring0L » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:46 am

nixy wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:38 am
aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:29 am
nixy wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 am
aspiring0L wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 am
Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote:
Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 am
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?
Thanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.
Lol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.
Poor troll, so mad.
Not mad. If we have to pay for the proles then I’m glad they have a poor track record.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “Legal Employment”