Thanks for the diagnosis, doc!aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:44 pm
Awesome, so I was right (there are lawyers who call themselves Doctors, as befitting their education and background) and the others here were wrong ("no lawyers without an MD or PhD calls him or herself a Doctor"). You sound pretty angry with this punching business, I would consider lowering your blood pressure.
Doctor v. Esquire Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Hmmmmmm, you seem to suffer from "I Think Anonymous Strangers on Internet Forums Are Wrong" Syndrome.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 4:34 pmThanks for the diagnosis, doc!aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:44 pm
Awesome, so I was right (there are lawyers who call themselves Doctors, as befitting their education and background) and the others here were wrong ("no lawyers without an MD or PhD calls him or herself a Doctor"). You sound pretty angry with this punching business, I would consider lowering your blood pressure.
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Mods, just lock this thread.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
She did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
I am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pmShe did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
I mean you’ve already shown yourself to be a fount of ill-informed bad opinions, so keep going.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:43 pmI am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pmShe did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
Also you’re not even the JD kind of doctor so I don’t know what “we” you’re talking about.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Got it, some education hack degree that is a glorified jobs program for Delaware's finest merits the Doctor title but YLS is suspect. Because Lawgic.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:47 pmI mean you’ve already shown yourself to be a fount of ill-informed bad opinions, so keep going.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:43 pmI am sure it was cutting edge research befitting a 125+ IQ scholar, as fellow Doctors we can all agree on that. U. Del is just a hub of intellectual activity.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pmShe did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
Also you’re not even the JD kind if doctor so I don’t know what “we” you’re talking about.
"JD kind if [sic] doctor" thanks for acknowledging the JD holders are doctors too.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
No one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.
(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Phew, that was a mouthful! That FB group may have served its purpose now that enough literature is out there on the matter.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pmNo one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.
(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
All I did was ask when it can make sense to go by Doctor, and I gave a few examples. I would not be so closed minded on the question. Surely, there are situations to do it.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:56 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
OP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
He was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:08 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
No. There are not.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:13 pm. . .nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pmNo one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.
(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
Surely, there are situations to do it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Way ahead of you guy. We already covered them. Keep up.becodalapa wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:20 pmNo. There are not.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:13 pm. . .nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:04 pmNo one has contested that the degree is a Juris Doctor. That’s just not the same as calling yourself doctor professionally. Nor does calling yourself doctor have anything to do with educational chops - there are plenty of hack PhDs and MDs who can use the title, and plenty of brilliant professional degree holders who can’t. I don’t get why you’re railing at social conventions as if they have some substantive meaning. Go ahead and call yourself doctor once you get your JD if you like, that’s not going to change the fact that social conventions mean you will look like a pretentious ignorant tryhard.
(Because I’m a boomer in spirit I do have FB and that 113 person group from 2011 or whenever it was no longer exists.)
Surely, there are situations to do it.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
You clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pmHe was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
He was also a sockpuppet, the creation of the same guy who made up Johnny B Goode or whatever his username was. This one sounds kind of the same, though, in insisting that things that aren't real actually are. That's been a pretty consistent thread throughout his fake accounts.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pmHe was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
Edit: scooped. FTR it was this guy: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=256455
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Silly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pmYou clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pmHe was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Yeah? Too busy with your doctor stuff?aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:53 pmSilly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pmYou clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pmHe was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
That dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pmShe did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Less value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 amThat dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.nixy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:40 pmShe did at least write a 136 pp dissertation for the degree, which is more than JDs do.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 12:25 pmShe has a doctorate in education which is a joke of a degree (takes 2 years weekends only) but it's standard for people in education like principals or cc teachers to go by Dr with a DEd. Conservatives decided to troll; liberals called them sexists, everyone had a fun news cycle playing their traditional roles.
Agreed. It would be best put out of its misery.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Thanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 amLess value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 amThat dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Too busy not being scared to write under a pseud, anonymousAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:14 amYeah? Too busy with your doctor stuff?aspiring0L wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:53 pmSilly ‘ole me that I don’t have time to track this shit like a giggling middle schooler.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:02 pmYou clearly weren’t paying enough attention, Dooley was a confirmed troll and wasn’t actually real (iirc he’s a third-year in NYC). This could easily be the same guy.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:36 pmHe was a tool. And from Orlando.MountainMama wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:22 pmOP's voice and style are pretty similar to Dooley. Too bad we'll never know if Tampa lawyers drum up medmal cases by introducing themselves as doctors.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Lol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 amThanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 amLess value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 amThat dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Poor troll, so mad.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:29 amLol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 amThanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 amLess value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 amThat dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:44 pm
Re: Doctor v. Esquire
Not mad. If we have to pay for the proles then I’m glad they have a poor track record.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:38 amPoor troll, so mad.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:29 amLol, you do know the mouth breathers trying to play football at junior “college” pocket pell grant money for it right? And fail out six weeks in once it clears? The whole thing is a charade and hires midwits like Jill. At least a Cooley midterm taker doesn’t demand we call him or her a doctor.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:25 amThanks for your charming classist ignorant takes, keep them coming! Your bitterness is life-giving.aspiring0L wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:22 amLess value to society too. Wasn’t her thesis on how to keep dumb students in community colleges (so they can keep being indebted with no skills)?Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:05 amThat dissertation involved less critical thinking than a median 1L exam at Cooley.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login