You've been told repeatedly that you wouldn't be "sacrificing your career"—literally nobody, you or anybody else, has been able to articulate a reason why you'd be sacrificing your career by working at a V50 in Philly or Dallas instead of a V20 in New York. And there's no "all things considered" because everyone's career goals are different, which is why people are so curious what you think the difference would be so that you can get the best advice possible.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 1:54 amWe've done long distance before, we're doing it now, we don't like it but neither of us want to be in a situation where one resents the other in 10 years for "sacrificing their career." I understand that you think it's absurd that I'm considering this but I'm really not some crazy/stupid/heartless bitch. Law school is a pressure cooker for prestige whoring and I'm looking for advice to figure out if, all things considered, a V20 will do more than a V50 for my career or if it's all just smoke from other insecure 2Ls. So far, consensus seems to be the latter.
I can imagine, for instance, a handful of career trajectories where there's a difference. Maybe you want to get really good at cap markets because your parents live in Hong Kong and you (reasonably) think that practice area would be your best chance of lateralling overseas. That's a decent reason to be in NYC—but it's not something I'd interpolate onto a "generic" T14 grad because cap-markets otherwise sucks ass and the vast majority of people don't want to move to HK.
Again, 100% of the reason we're giving you grief is that you still haven't put anything on that side of the scale aside from "NYC would be fun" (which I sympathize with but also think is a couple orders of magnitude less important than being able to see my partner on a Tuesday).