Bad news, OP... I don't even go to a T14 and I have an offer at S&C! Perhaps you should steer clear of there as well. Did it ever cross your mind that there are lots of reasons to go to lots of different law schools, and that the hiring committees pick bright students from all over the place? Get over yourself.CLSV5er wrote:OP here.
Sorry if I came off as a troll. I didn’t grow up wealthy and worked my way to a top 3 Ivy and CLS. It may annoy you, but don’t want to spend time working or speaking with people who didn’t have to work nearly as hard as I did or have the same credentials and grades. After interviewing, I believe that this sentiment is widely shared at Columbia and at top law firms by people with unblemished credentials.
Example: A few partners I socialized with at a callback drinks event explicitly said that nobody cares about law schools at U. Virginia, Michigan, Berkeley, Penn in New York City. Associates at Cleary and DPW also seem to be very aware of how the diminished Vault ranking is hurting their recruiting, and they are cringing about having more people from lesser schools like these than ever before.
I think I’m going to go with S&C or CSM. I get the impression you can move from one of those to DPW or Cleary but not the other way around. You guys could have commented on the relative quality of people and practices at these firms but instead you decided to troll and attack me.
CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
completelystuck
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:32 pm
Re: CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary
-
PeanutsNJam
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary
This is the word that cinched CLSV5er as a troll. You're trying too hard.CLSV5er wrote:A few partners I socialized with at a callback drinks
-
DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
-
spidey314
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 8:33 pm
Re: CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary
Why S&C over CSM?DoveBodyWash wrote:S&C.
-
DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary
I have friends at CSMspidey314 wrote:Why S&C over CSM?DoveBodyWash wrote:S&C.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
notinbiglaw
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:05 am
Re: CSM v. DPW v. S&C v. STB v. Cleary
DoveBodyWash wrote:I have friends at CSMspidey314 wrote:Why S&C over CSM?DoveBodyWash wrote:S&C.
