I'm also not sure if this is a joke. I've pulled 2200+ years, and that sucked enough. I also worked more weekends than not in any given year and that sucks.gk101 wrote:you are delusional if you think working those hours for a year as a full time associate is the same as working over a summerkcdc1 wrote:FWIW, I working as a summer just as much as the associates were -- was billing at a ~2,600 hour pace. It's a lot of work, and it definitely sucked to work 8 AM to 12 AM day after day as our filing deadline approached. That said, I had dinner with my family most nights, and I had at least one solid recovery day most weekends. You don't have to completely sacrifice your family to work 65 hour weeks. 80+ hours is a different story, but biglaw does not seem to require 80+ hour weeks, at least outside of NYC.handsonthewheel wrote:Try to bill (let's split the difference) 2,400 hours as a first and second year associate and see how that goes. There will be many hours in the office you don't bill. There will be many days where you show up early so you can go on that date/out with friends/see your family and you get hit with the 6:30pm assignment which needs to get done ASAP (bonus points if you turned the work in weeks ago to someone who got to it last minute only to ping you with revisions to ruin your night).
Don't get me wrong, it's not totally unrealistic that you can balance some things with a biglaw job. But as a summer associate you did not see the reality of the job. My perspective as a summer associate was nothing like what I experienced in my first years on the job, it just is not comparable and you cannot "see" what associate life is like, you have to experience it.
How is working 8 am to 12 am every day fine even if you get dinner with your family? Sorry but biglaw associates don't get paid enough to consistently work 16 hour days, especially not in a high COL place. I'd say 12 hour days on average are normal, but 16 day after day is fine? That sucks IMO.