Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
It seems a little hyperbolic to say that not having as good a chance as HYS students at the extremely narrow subset of jobs that put you in line for a SCOTUS clerkship, which by definition only a very very small number of people ever will get, is putting a huge dent in career prospects. If not getting a SCOTUS clerkship is a huge dent in career prospects, most of us should give up now.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432609
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
Garland flatly refuses to hire CCN on down. Kavanaugh isn't as explicit but also won't. That's the 2 top feeders automatically gone if you go to CCN.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432609
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
Anonymous User wrote:Garland flatly refuses to hire CCN on down. Kavanaugh isn't as explicit but also won't. That's the 2 top feeders automatically gone if you go to CCN.
There's no denying HY confer a measurable advantage in the feeder-SCOTUS race (esp HLR), as everyone here is saying. But your statements are both demonstrably false, as are nearly all categorical claims of this nature. http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni ... clerks.htm; http://weblaw.usc.edu/who/faculty/direc ... ilid=71272.
Moreover, kavanaugh is well known as a polarizing conservative, and you wouldn't want to jump on that ship without particular (less popular) ideological inclinations. Actually, top feeders in the Roberts court are garland, kozinski and wilkinson. Kozinski draws from CCN regularly: http://www.law.nyu.edu/news/scotus_clerks_2012; http://www.law.columbia.edu/media_inqui ... lerks-2014. As does Wilkinson (with lots of love to UVa). Katzmann, another big feeder, always has former NYU or CLS students.
-
84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
lol @ the retard who posted thisAnonymous User wrote:Garland flatly refuses to hire CCN on down. Kavanaugh isn't as explicit but also won't. That's the 2 top feeders automatically gone if you go to CCN.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432609
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
Coming to this late, but wanted to point out that this is absolutely false. Garland recently had a UVA grad who went Garland->Bristow->Breyer.Anonymous User wrote:Garland flatly refuses to hire CCN on down. Kavanaugh isn't as explicit but also won't. That's the 2 top feeders automatically gone if you go to CCN.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432609
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Top 5% CCN, top ?% HYS?
And Kavanaugh has a Chicago grad going to Scalia for the October 2016 term
