Marriage Tax Penalty Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
wingding

Bronze
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Marriage Tax Penalty

Post by wingding » Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:01 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
wingding wrote:also, for anyone complaining about the marriage penalty, you should calculate your taxes twice: Married filing jointly vs Married filing separately
It's always better to do married filing jointly. You will always pay either the same or higher taxes if you do married filing separately. Check out the current tax brackets and do a few hypos. You'll see that I'm right: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/tax-brackets.aspx.

People are complaining about the tax rate for single people vs. the tax rate for MFJ, not the tax rates for MFJ vs. MFS.
it's got more to do with deductions, than anything else.
Marriage penalty only comes into play once the combined income exceeds $148k, and looking only at the brackets, it climbs slowly,and only reaches approximately 2% of income when you hit the $395k or so.
Thereafter, the percentage grows steadily until you hit a combined $800k (4% of income), and thereafter it starts decreasing again.
That's not a lot of money, proportionally, and traditionally you would save significantly more because of shared expenses. There are also some tax benefits to being married, but that's a separate issue.
Admittedly, the times have changed, and not as many couples are tying the knot, but, it really isn't that big a deal.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: Marriage Tax Penalty

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:32 pm

Doesn't one spouse being on IBR/PAYE/etc potentially favor filing separately?

Alternatively: dying alone in a debtors prison.

ookoshi

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:30 am

Re: Marriage Tax Penalty

Post by ookoshi » Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:56 am

wingding wrote:it's got more to do with deductions, than anything else.
Marriage penalty only comes into play once the combined income exceeds $148k, and looking only at the brackets, it climbs slowly,and only reaches approximately 2% of income when you hit the $395k or so.
Thereafter, the percentage grows steadily until you hit a combined $800k (4% of income), and thereafter it starts decreasing again.
That's not a lot of money, proportionally, and traditionally you would save significantly more because of shared expenses. There are also some tax benefits to being married, but that's a separate issue.
Admittedly, the times have changed, and not as many couples are tying the knot, but, it really isn't that big a deal.
Looking only at the marginal tax rate is not the point. The bottom line tax liability is all that matters. As far as shared expenses, nothing is stopping you from sharing expenses without getting married, so sharing expenses is not really an additional benefit of being married.

It can and does end up being a big deal sometimes.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”