which firms are considered really unselective firms?Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this. Anyone have insight?Anonymous User wrote:So I'm slightly above median. I'm having a hard time interpreting the GPA cutoffs, because if I read them strictly I only seem to be in the running for less than 10 firms. Putting aside competitive bidding, what firms range are simply out of the running for me? Or to put a more optimistic spin on it, what are some of the better firms I should still throw a bid at?
Also, being medianish, is it extremely unwise not to bid on one of the really unselective firms because I would never ever want to work there?
Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Like Nixon or SewardLasers wrote:which firms are considered really unselective firms?Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this. Anyone have insight?Anonymous User wrote:So I'm slightly above median. I'm having a hard time interpreting the GPA cutoffs, because if I read them strictly I only seem to be in the running for less than 10 firms. Putting aside competitive bidding, what firms range are simply out of the running for me? Or to put a more optimistic spin on it, what are some of the better firms I should still throw a bid at?
Also, being medianish, is it extremely unwise not to bid on one of the really unselective firms because I would never ever want to work there?
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Hey guyz,Anonymous User wrote:I mean the median/mean GPAs. I know i'm not competitive for basically any firm at OCI, so it will be hard to create a bid list, but i'm curious which are strictly no-goes. Like i said, if you read the cutoffs, basically every firm is a no go.BuckinghamB wrote:by cutoffs do you mean the median gpas for offers, or bottom quartile?Anonymous User wrote:So I'm slightly above median. I'm having a hard time interpreting the GPA cutoffs, because if I read them strictly I only seem to be in the running for less than 10 firms. Putting aside competitive bidding, what firms range are simply out of the running for me? Or to put a more optimistic spin on it, what are some of the better firms I should still throw a bid at?
I'm not sure why you are accounting for cut-offs like this. It seems to me that a cut-off is when its lowest offered gpa is really close to its bottom 25th quartile gpa. For an example, see MoFo or Quinn. If I remember correctly those firm's lowest gpa with an offer is very close to their 25th quartile--at least for MoFo SF and Quinn LA. So I assume that the cut off for a firm like that is around the lowest quartile.
I don't think I would assume a median offered gpa is a "cut-off," particularly for a firm with dozens of offers because there are likely lots of people with gpas below that median and offers.
Also I thought the school released the medians for the classes. For example I thought the 1L curve for Fall 2012 was like 3.23 or something? No?
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Also, this is probably somewhat market specific. Knowing a market would help. The law school provides a lot of resources for info like this.Anonymous User wrote:Like Nixon or SewardLasers wrote:which firms are considered really unselective firms?Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this. Anyone have insight?Anonymous User wrote:So I'm slightly above median. I'm having a hard time interpreting the GPA cutoffs, because if I read them strictly I only seem to be in the running for less than 10 firms. Putting aside competitive bidding, what firms range are simply out of the running for me? Or to put a more optimistic spin on it, what are some of the better firms I should still throw a bid at?
Also, being medianish, is it extremely unwise not to bid on one of the really unselective firms because I would never ever want to work there?
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
I'm accounting for cutoffs like this because both career services and 3Ls have told me to. Apparently much of the offers that drag down the low and 25th percentile are from exceptions/minority hires etc, and so even the means will be generous.oblig.lawl.ref wrote:Hey guyz,Anonymous User wrote:I mean the median/mean GPAs. I know i'm not competitive for basically any firm at OCI, so it will be hard to create a bid list, but i'm curious which are strictly no-goes. Like i said, if you read the cutoffs, basically every firm is a no go.BuckinghamB wrote:by cutoffs do you mean the median gpas for offers, or bottom quartile?Anonymous User wrote:So I'm slightly above median. I'm having a hard time interpreting the GPA cutoffs, because if I read them strictly I only seem to be in the running for less than 10 firms. Putting aside competitive bidding, what firms range are simply out of the running for me? Or to put a more optimistic spin on it, what are some of the better firms I should still throw a bid at?
I'm not sure why you are accounting for cut-offs like this. It seems to me that a cut-off is when its lowest offered gpa is really close to its bottom 25th quartile gpa. For an example, see MoFo or Quinn. If I remember correctly those firm's lowest gpa with an offer is very close to their 25th quartile--at least for MoFo SF and Quinn LA. So I assume that the cut off for a firm like that is around the lowest quartile.
I don't think I would assume a median offered gpa is a "cut-off," particularly for a firm with dozens of offers because there are likely lots of people with gpas below that median and offers.
Also I thought the school released the medians for the classes. For example I thought the 1L curve for Fall 2012 was like 3.23 or something? No?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Ok, if you want to account for it like that that's fine. And It's true that a lot of the lowest gpa's are gonna be diversity/ip/special things but like I said if you're interpreting the median at a firm that offered like 25 people to be their "cut-off" you've got to be doing it wrong and if OCP told you that they're wrong.
Just think about it--how can it be a cut-off when half of all the offers they've ever given out were below it? A cut-off is generally the minimum gpa to which they will give an offer. Look at diversity information--half of the firm's SAs are not diversity. So it doesn't make sense to assume everyone below median--or even close to that--are "special."
Median is median. Cut-off is something else. I wouldn't equate the two. But hey if you wanna bid on that premise, it's no problem for me.
ETA: I may not be understanding what you're saying. Just to be clear what I'm saying is that median and means do not represent the cut-off. I am not saying the lowest offered GPA or the bottom quartile GPA represents the cut-off. I am saying the bottom quartile is probably a hell of a lot closer to the cut-off in most firms because it is unlikely that more than 25% of their offers are given to people with mitigating or special circumstances.
Just think about it--how can it be a cut-off when half of all the offers they've ever given out were below it? A cut-off is generally the minimum gpa to which they will give an offer. Look at diversity information--half of the firm's SAs are not diversity. So it doesn't make sense to assume everyone below median--or even close to that--are "special."
Median is median. Cut-off is something else. I wouldn't equate the two. But hey if you wanna bid on that premise, it's no problem for me.
ETA: I may not be understanding what you're saying. Just to be clear what I'm saying is that median and means do not represent the cut-off. I am not saying the lowest offered GPA or the bottom quartile GPA represents the cut-off. I am saying the bottom quartile is probably a hell of a lot closer to the cut-off in most firms because it is unlikely that more than 25% of their offers are given to people with mitigating or special circumstances.
- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
According to many employed and recently graduated M students, median/mean is still the most valuable metric for gauging your chances at OCI, even though it is not technically a "cut-off" for all the reasons previously mentioned.
As a rule of thumb, I've heard you want your GPA to be just above median to be competitive for that firm. Of course it's a sliding scale depending on how stellar your interviewing skills/ other credentials are. However, if you're an average candidate (non-LR, non-moot court champ, little to no relevant WE), then I think the rule applies.
As a rule of thumb, I've heard you want your GPA to be just above median to be competitive for that firm. Of course it's a sliding scale depending on how stellar your interviewing skills/ other credentials are. However, if you're an average candidate (non-LR, non-moot court champ, little to no relevant WE), then I think the rule applies.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Exactly, this is what I heard. So this takes me back to my original question: if you're just slightly above median, by using this approach to bidding there are literally less than 10 firms in NY that you are competitive for, so how the hell do you structure the rest of your bid list?DaftAndDirect wrote:According to many employed and recently graduated M students, median/mean is still the most valuable metric for gauging your chances at OCI, even though it is not technically a "cut-off" for all the reasons previously mentioned.
As a rule of thumb, I've heard you want your GPA to be just above median to be competitive for that firm. Of course it's a sliding scale depending on how stellar your interviewing skills/ other credentials are. However, if you're an average candidate (non-LR, non-moot court champ, little to no relevant WE), then I think the rule applies.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
In that case, you'll want to fill out the rest of your bid list with reach firms (obviously where you're as close as possible to their median). Put the 10 that are targets at the top of the list.Anonymous User wrote:Exactly, this is what I heard. So this takes me back to my original question: if you're just slightly above median, by using this approach to bidding there are literally less than 10 firms in NY that you are competitive for, so how the hell do you structure the rest of your bid list?
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Rising 2L disclaimer...Bronte wrote:In that case, you'll want to fill out the rest of your bid list with reach firms (obviously where you're as close as possible to their median). Put the 10 that are targets at the top of the list.Anonymous User wrote:Exactly, this is what I heard. So this takes me back to my original question: if you're just slightly above median, by using this approach to bidding there are literally less than 10 firms in NY that you are competitive for, so how the hell do you structure the rest of your bid list?
Being median means you're not "competitive" for most firms. That's the nature of median, unfortunately. But you should take solace in the fact you're not below a "cut-off." That was the distinction I had in mind in our earlier discussion re cut-offs. Being below a "cut-off" for a firm is not the same as not being "competitive."
Like Bronte said, it's relatively simple--you put the firms that you are at median highest and after that the closer you are to a firm's median, the higher you rank it.
I'd also recommend going through the list OCP linked to in its 4th email to us with info from last year's bidding. The one that showed how many people bid on how many spots. Of course the info is likely to be different this year as certain offices may have more interview slots available and popularity of firms may wane but when you are debating exactly where to list a firm it may help to know that they only interviewed a small number of students at Michigan last year.
HTH
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
I was in your shoes last summer at OCI (T 14 school ranked below Michigan). I was slightly below median. I got 5 callbacks and only one offer. The offer was at one of my top choices. I am working there in NYC this summer and loving it. Just had mid summer reviews and mine was excellent. Don't give up!Anonymous User wrote:I definitely think I can bring it to slightly above median (3.3 at the lowest, and 3.35 best case scenario barring some miracle), by the time OCI rolls around.
I'm just terrified that if I do end up at median I will be screwed.
I am going to try to write on for LR, I'm doing a moot court competition, and I'm the co-chair of an org. Very involved on campus. I'm not horribly awkward or anything.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
Thanks, this is helpful.oblig.lawl.ref wrote:Rising 2L disclaimer...Bronte wrote:In that case, you'll want to fill out the rest of your bid list with reach firms (obviously where you're as close as possible to their median). Put the 10 that are targets at the top of the list.Anonymous User wrote:Exactly, this is what I heard. So this takes me back to my original question: if you're just slightly above median, by using this approach to bidding there are literally less than 10 firms in NY that you are competitive for, so how the hell do you structure the rest of your bid list?
Being median means you're not "competitive" for most firms. That's the nature of median, unfortunately. But you should take solace in the fact you're not below a "cut-off." That was the distinction I had in mind in our earlier discussion re cut-offs. Being below a "cut-off" for a firm is not the same as not being "competitive."
Like Bronte said, it's relatively simple--you put the firms that you are at median highest and after that the closer you are to a firm's median, the higher you rank it.
I'd also recommend going through the list OCP linked to in its 4th email to us with info from last year's bidding. The one that showed how many people bid on how many spots. Of course the info is likely to be different this year as certain offices may have more interview slots available and popularity of firms may wane but when you are debating exactly where to list a firm it may help to know that they only interviewed a small number of students at Michigan last year.
HTH
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
It's not helpful to think of recruiting in cut-offs because 1) many firms don't appear to use one and 2) even if they do it's not all that helpful.
Callback medians are better because it at least gives you an idea of what types of GPAs that firm is comfortable with. But, you gotta do more than just rely on it. You have to do some common sense analysis on it. Firms who call back 1-2 have pretty unstable medians. They could not care about grades but just happen to fall in love with 2 people with 3.7's so their median is 3.7. Or a firm that is typically very selective, but small might call back 3 people, 2 of them diversity candidates that cured cancer, and might have too low.
I think a good rule of thumb is take the median and subtract .15-.2 (at NW the common wisdom is .2 but you guys have a tighter curve than us, so maybe .15 or less). Any lower than that and you usually face a big up hill battle. Of course there are exceptions. And you shouldn't be afraid to big on ~3 firms that seem like a good fit but also seem like a bit out of your range.
But the reverse isn't really true. Don't load up on a bunch of firms that have low medians just because you are above them. A firm who doesn't care about grades all that much, typically doesn't then find decent grades all that impressive. It makes sense, if they thought grades were very important, they wouldn't take people with poorer grades.
You want to include at least several big, fairly unselective firms.
You want to include firms you think you think would be a good fit. If you worked at the Dept. of Labor, you should probably bid Morgan Lewis, Jones Day, Paul Hastings, Proskauer because they all do a lot of employment and labor stuff. So in the interview you can talk that shit up.
Like I said before a few, but not a lot, of firms who you think you have a long shot with.
Do not fall into the trap of chasing firms with low medians, who also have a low number of SA slots (unless you think you and the firm are a good fit). Someone mentioned Nixon Peabody. Sure their median is low, but they take 3 people for their NYC office. That means they are maybe calling back 1-2 people from each T14.
An aside on bidding game theory:
Figure out where in the bid list people typically stop getting interviews at major market firms. For example, at NU after bid slot 15, you just can't going to get a Chicago, NYC, or CA firm (other than super selective firms). So at NU (I dunno how mich works), you really wanna but targets at slots 0-10. Then you put reaches 10-15, extreme targets 15-20. But you can also try to get some secondary market interviews (since you aren't going to get major market) by putting them from 15 and up.
Callback medians are better because it at least gives you an idea of what types of GPAs that firm is comfortable with. But, you gotta do more than just rely on it. You have to do some common sense analysis on it. Firms who call back 1-2 have pretty unstable medians. They could not care about grades but just happen to fall in love with 2 people with 3.7's so their median is 3.7. Or a firm that is typically very selective, but small might call back 3 people, 2 of them diversity candidates that cured cancer, and might have too low.
I think a good rule of thumb is take the median and subtract .15-.2 (at NW the common wisdom is .2 but you guys have a tighter curve than us, so maybe .15 or less). Any lower than that and you usually face a big up hill battle. Of course there are exceptions. And you shouldn't be afraid to big on ~3 firms that seem like a good fit but also seem like a bit out of your range.
But the reverse isn't really true. Don't load up on a bunch of firms that have low medians just because you are above them. A firm who doesn't care about grades all that much, typically doesn't then find decent grades all that impressive. It makes sense, if they thought grades were very important, they wouldn't take people with poorer grades.
You want to include at least several big, fairly unselective firms.
You want to include firms you think you think would be a good fit. If you worked at the Dept. of Labor, you should probably bid Morgan Lewis, Jones Day, Paul Hastings, Proskauer because they all do a lot of employment and labor stuff. So in the interview you can talk that shit up.
Like I said before a few, but not a lot, of firms who you think you have a long shot with.
Do not fall into the trap of chasing firms with low medians, who also have a low number of SA slots (unless you think you and the firm are a good fit). Someone mentioned Nixon Peabody. Sure their median is low, but they take 3 people for their NYC office. That means they are maybe calling back 1-2 people from each T14.
An aside on bidding game theory:
Figure out where in the bid list people typically stop getting interviews at major market firms. For example, at NU after bid slot 15, you just can't going to get a Chicago, NYC, or CA firm (other than super selective firms). So at NU (I dunno how mich works), you really wanna but targets at slots 0-10. Then you put reaches 10-15, extreme targets 15-20. But you can also try to get some secondary market interviews (since you aren't going to get major market) by putting them from 15 and up.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Median @ Michigan + Chances at BigLaw
+1
Thanks DF
Thanks DF
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login