Firms to avoid Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Latham just crossed the $2 Billion in revenue marker last year and it continues to grow. It's financially doing fine; the downsizing probably made it a more profitable business anyway.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Can anyone confirm? I don't think they even had 50 summers.Anonymous User wrote: No idea about Philly, but Dechert did no offer 5 of their 50 summers in NY this year.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Take a look at the H1 2012 league tablesAnonymous User wrote:Latham just crossed the $2 Billion in revenue marker last year and it continues to grow. It's financially doing fine; the downsizing probably made it a more profitable business anyway.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Any news concerning Chicago firms/offices specifically?
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Mid-level at a Dallas firm. We offered our entire class.Anonymous User wrote:Well word from my CSO is that Fulbright no offered its entire Dallas summer class. However, that might be more an issue with Dallas than Fulbright. I wouldn't be surprised if 1/3 or more of all SAs in Dallas were no offered.Anonymous User wrote:I have heard T&K also, no offered a bunch. Also, I would stay away from Fulbright in Texas. Rumblings from high ups at other firms in town is that they have been shopping around to try to merge the firm and aren't doing well.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
They don't. Also, while it's nice and comforting for a firm to have a 100% offer rate, most firms don't. 90% isn't too terrible, and I think the actual offer rate was a bit higher (lateral link has it as 94%).Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone confirm? I don't think they even had 50 summers.Anonymous User wrote: No idea about Philly, but Dechert did no offer 5 of their 50 summers in NY this year.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
NALP lists 43 summers for Dechert NY's 2012 class, which was a huge jump from 19 in 2011 and 12 in 2010.Anonymous User wrote:They don't. Also, while it's nice and comforting for a firm to have a 100% offer rate, most firms don't. 90% isn't too terrible, and I think the actual offer rate was a bit higher (lateral link has it as 94%).Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone confirm? I don't think they even had 50 summers.Anonymous User wrote: No idea about Philly, but Dechert did no offer 5 of their 50 summers in NY this year.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Firms to avoid
One of these days I'm going to make people see that revenue, profitability, league tables, etc, are only indirectly related to anything you care about as an associate.Anonymous User wrote:Take a look at the H1 2012 league tablesAnonymous User wrote:Latham just crossed the $2 Billion in revenue marker last year and it continues to grow. It's financially doing fine; the downsizing probably made it a more profitable business anyway.
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Firms to avoid
plz tell me what I care about as an associaterayiner wrote:One of these days I'm going to make people see that revenue, profitability, league tables, etc, are only indirectly related to anything you care about as an associate.Anonymous User wrote:Take a look at the H1 2012 league tablesAnonymous User wrote:Latham just crossed the $2 Billion in revenue marker last year and it continues to grow. It's financially doing fine; the downsizing probably made it a more profitable business anyway.
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Hey motherfucker, answer the fucking question.bjsesq wrote:bjsesq wrote:Source or GTFO.Anonymous User wrote:They gave 22 offers.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Job security, to a lesser extent exit options. When you're partner you can dick wave about how your firm is doing in the league tables.androstan wrote:plz tell me what I care about as an associaterayiner wrote:One of these days I'm going to make people see that revenue, profitability, league tables, etc, are only indirectly related to anything you care about as an associate.Anonymous User wrote:Take a look at the H1 2012 league tablesAnonymous User wrote:Latham just crossed the $2 Billion in revenue marker last year and it continues to grow. It's financially doing fine; the downsizing probably made it a more profitable business anyway.
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
I'd love to know how to figure this out...rayiner wrote:
Job security, to a lesser extent exit options. When you're partner you can dick wave about how your firm is doing in the league tables.

- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Definitely. Is there a way to reliable know job security and exit options? I presume that the Vault rankings approximate exit options? And the % of associates promoted to partner approximates job security? Those are generally inversely related, which is just wonderful.booboo wrote:I'd love to know how to figure this out...rayiner wrote:
Job security, to a lesser extent exit options. When you're partner you can dick wave about how your firm is doing in the league tables..
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I heard that Dechert wanted 35 for the 2012 class when I was interviewing, so 43 would be higher than they wanted but not crazy. If they had 43 summers and a 94% offer rate, then that is a max of 3 no offers.Anonymous User wrote:NALP lists 43 summers for Dechert NY's 2012 class, which was a huge jump from 19 in 2011 and 12 in 2010.Anonymous User wrote:They don't. Also, while it's nice and comforting for a firm to have a 100% offer rate, most firms don't. 90% isn't too terrible, and I think the actual offer rate was a bit higher (lateral link has it as 94%).Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone confirm? I don't think they even had 50 summers.Anonymous User wrote: No idea about Philly, but Dechert did no offer 5 of their 50 summers in NY this year.
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Any word on VE dallas? Im curious about litigation and M&ADesert Fox wrote:I've heard Dallas firms are doing bad, very slow.Anonymous User wrote:New Anon here: Statement about Dallas seems way too panicky. Weil's Dallas office gave 100% offers. Would be surprised if Gibson Dunn Dallas was hurting. Latham in Houston is booming. Maybe it's just an issue with some Texas firms not being as healthy as they thought.Anonymous User wrote:Well word from my CSO is that Fulbright no offered its entire Dallas summer class. However, that might be more an issue with Dallas than Fulbright. I wouldn't be surprised if 1/3 or more of all SAs in Dallas were no offered.Anonymous User wrote:I have heard T&K also, no offered a bunch. Also, I would stay away from Fulbright in Texas. Rumblings from high ups at other firms in town is that they have been shopping around to try to merge the firm and aren't doing well.
- joeshmo39
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:15 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Nothing you said contradicted anything I said. I said they no-offered an appreciable amount this year. You said they offered everyone last year. We can both be right.Younger Abstention wrote:Completely untrue. 100% offer rate last year (at least in Philly).joeshmo39 wrote:I heard Dechert no-offered around a third of their Philly summer class. Bear in mind they are
headquartered in Philly. They also pulled a "don't call us, we'll call you" move with their summers from a couple years ago.
I said the "don't call us, we'll call you" move was from a few years ago, not last year. [Edit] I cannot emphasize enough how dirty this move was.
Also, cite:
http://abovethelaw.com/2009/08/nationwi ... mer-class/
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Was told this by multiple summers. Don't know if they found out through word-of-mouth/process-of-elimination or told directly from on high.bjsesq wrote:bjsesq wrote:Source or GTFO.Anonymous User wrote:They gave 22 offers.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
No one is disputing the dick move they pulled back in 2009, but I'd like to see a source on them no-offering 1/3 of their Philly SAs. Pretty sure an offer rate that bad would merit some coverage, a la Winston & Strawn.joeshmo39 wrote:Nothing you said contradicted anything I said. I said they no-offered an appreciable amount this year. You said they offered everyone last year. We can both be right.Younger Abstention wrote:Completely untrue. 100% offer rate last year (at least in Philly).joeshmo39 wrote:I heard Dechert no-offered around a third of their Philly summer class. Bear in mind they are
headquartered in Philly. They also pulled a "don't call us, we'll call you" move with their summers from a couple years ago.
I said the "don't call us, we'll call you" move was from a few years ago, not last year. [Edit] I cannot emphasize enough how dirty this move was.
Also, cite:
http://abovethelaw.com/2009/08/nationwi ... mer-class/
- joeshmo39
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:15 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Fair enough. Source is I heard it from a guy who I trust. *shrugs* I guess we'll see when the numbers come out. I understand that's pretty underwhelming.Anonymous User wrote: No one is disputing the dick move they pulled back in 2009, but I'd like to see a source on them no-offering 1/3 of their Philly SAs. Pretty sure an offer rate that bad would merit some coverage, a la Winston & Strawn.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Anyone know anything about Denver firms and their offer rates to summers this year?
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I have a CB with them and I'd like to know about this too.Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hearing anything about Pillsbury? There was some mumbling last year about them.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I was one of the summers and the exact number hasn't necessarily been disclosed. 20-22 is the common range of offers I have heard of.Anonymous User wrote:Was told this by multiple summers. Don't know if they found out through word-of-mouth/process-of-elimination or told directly from on high.bjsesq wrote:bjsesq wrote:Source or GTFO.Anonymous User wrote:They gave 22 offers.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Kirkland -- Not surprising, but they continue to thrive. Biggest 2012 summer class in Chicago by far and everyone seems very busy (they recently bolstered their RE practice with a few strong lateral hires and their IP lit is swamped apparently)Anonymous User wrote:Any news concerning Chicago firms/offices specifically?
Sidley -- Not as hot as Kirkland, but still busy and had a good-sized summer class.
Skadden -- Rumor has it that this satellite office has been very slow lately. Did not make 100% offers to their small summer class this summer (Don't know if it was because of fit or something else).
Latham -- Probably the busiest of the satellite offices. Apparently did not make 100% offers but was told that was because of a fit issue.
Foley -- Don't know much about how busy they are, but they shortened their summer program to 6-8 weeks this past summer.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Much appreciated. Any word on Baker McKenzie or Katten?Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland -- Not surprising, but they continue to thrive. Biggest 2012 summer class in Chicago by far and everyone seems very busy (they recently bolstered their RE practice with a few strong lateral hires and their IP lit is swamped apparently)Anonymous User wrote:Any news concerning Chicago firms/offices specifically?
Sidley -- Not as hot as Kirkland, but still busy and had a good-sized summer class.
Skadden -- Rumor has it that this satellite office has been very slow lately. Did not make 100% offers to their small summer class this summer (Don't know if it was because of fit or something else).
Latham -- Probably the busiest of the satellite offices. Apparently did not make 100% offers but was told that was because of a fit issue.
Foley -- Don't know much about how busy they are, but they shortened their summer program to 6-8 weeks this past summer.
-
- Posts: 432536
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I'm interested in hearing about the Kansas City firms (Shook, Husch, Lathrop and Gage, Polsinelli, etc.).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login