Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Anon abuse ftw.
- TTH
- Posts: 10471
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 1:14 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Wanted Jamail and Kolius, settled for Binder and Binder
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
This filth of a profession is overrun with turds.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Wanted to be She-Ra, will end up being a lawyer.
Sigh.
Sigh.
- TTH
- Posts: 10471
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 1:14 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Wanted to be a lawyer, will end up doing doc review at a warehouse in Dayton.IAFG wrote:Wanted to be She-Ra, will end up being a lawyer.
Sigh.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Maybe if you'd been AMBITIOUS enough to want to be He-Man, you would have landed among the comma jockeys.TTH wrote:Wanted to be a lawyer, will end up doing doc review at a warehouse in Dayton.IAFG wrote:Wanted to be She-Ra, will end up being a lawyer.
Sigh.
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Already summered. I'm a 3L.Anonymous User wrote:No, you're still a douche for telling people that you turned down Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo for your NLJ250. How often are you going to tell your coworkers about your sacrifice?Anonymous User wrote:Got my top choice: the best NLJ250 in my small market. Chose it over Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo. Does this make me the anti-douche?
I never mentioned it.
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Why the hell not?DOOM wrote:this can't be serious.Anonymous User wrote:Got my top choice: the best NLJ250 in my small market. Chose it over Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo. Does this make me the anti-douche?
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Poster was being facetious in that you'd actually tell your coworkers about your sacrifice. I don't see what this has to do with whether you've already summered there or not...and you just mentioned it now.Anonymous User wrote:Already summered. I'm a 3L.Anonymous User wrote:No, you're still a douche for telling people that you turned down Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo for your NLJ250. How often are you going to tell your coworkers about your sacrifice?Anonymous User wrote:Got my top choice: the best NLJ250 in my small market. Chose it over Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo. Does this make me the anti-douche?
I never mentioned it.
He doesn't mean the decision, I think, but rather you actually believing how telling everyone you scored multiple V10s somehow makes you an anti-douche.Anonymous User wrote:Why the hell not?DOOM wrote:this can't be serious.Anonymous User wrote:Got my top choice: the best NLJ250 in my small market. Chose it over Skadden/DPW/STB/Cleary/MoFo. Does this make me the anti-douche?
ITT some douches are shocked that their behavior is douchey behavior. This helps confirm that:
meshtdagn wrote:Douches don't try. They just are.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:57 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Love the douchenalysis ITT.
- smokyroom26
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:56 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
I wanted a square-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring, but that bastard showed up with a princess-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring. I threw the box at him.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Oh man, joke's on you. They're like the same thing lol.smokyroom26 wrote:I wanted a square-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring, but that bastard showed up with a princess-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring. I threw the box at him.
- smokyroom26
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:56 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
No way, Jose. The bevel around the edges of a princess-cut is WAY smaller than the bevel around the edges of a square-cut. See, e.g., this. Hence my steaming bitch-rage.DoubleChecks wrote:Oh man, joke's on you. They're like the same thing lol.smokyroom26 wrote:I wanted a square-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring, but that bastard showed up with a princess-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring. I threw the box at him.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
I assure you that you're wrong. There are several types of squared and rectangular cuts, but a square without truncated corners and with a brilliant cut pavilion is a princess cut, and is otherwise known as a square cut. The crown proportions don't change the shape classification.smokyroom26 wrote:No way, Jose. The bevel around the edges of a princess-cut is WAY smaller than the bevel around the edges of a square-cut. See, e.g., this. Hence my steaming bitch-rage.DoubleChecks wrote:Oh man, joke's on you. They're like the same thing lol.smokyroom26 wrote:I wanted a square-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring, but that bastard showed up with a princess-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring. I threw the box at him.
ETA: the style tiffany calls a "square cut" is shorthand for a "square emerald cut," otherwise known as an asscher. It's not a square at all, due to the truncated corners.
Last edited by IAFG on Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- smokyroom26
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:56 am
Re: Firm you're going to vs. firm that you wanted
Diamond owned. Still, screw that bastard for not giving me exactly what I wanted even though I had little to no idea what I was talking about.IAFG wrote:I assure you that you're wrong. There are several types of squared and rectangular cuts, but a square without truncated corners and with a brilliant cut pavilion is a princess cut, and is otherwise known as a square cut. The crown proportions don't change the shape classification.smokyroom26 wrote:No way, Jose. The bevel around the edges of a princess-cut is WAY smaller than the bevel around the edges of a square-cut. See, e.g., this. Hence my steaming bitch-rage.DoubleChecks wrote:Oh man, joke's on you. They're like the same thing lol.smokyroom26 wrote:I wanted a square-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring, but that bastard showed up with a princess-cut Tiffany diamond engagement ring. I threw the box at him.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login